FanGraphs Baseball


RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. I think this undervalue Dickey’s value as a fan favorite. This season the Mets had little to cheer in the second half, except for Dickey’s pursuit of the Cy Young and Mets fan really do love the guy.
    There is also value in the Mets not totally tanking and fielding an at least semi respectable team. It shows the fans there is some reason to come out to the ballpark. If the Mets trade Dickey and continue to not extend David Wright there is not going to be much reason for the fans to go out and see the team.

    Comment by Jamie — November 8, 2012 @ 3:42 pm

  2. I do not think Bourjos + would be enough for Dickey. Someone along the lines of an Alex Gordon makes more sense.

    Comment by Todd — November 8, 2012 @ 3:43 pm

  3. mmm, dubious assumptions I think. What team is going to make a qualifying offer of $13M+ for a 39 yo pitcher a year from now?

    the other thing is that normally 1 yr rentals don’t return much in the winter. During the year with the pressure of the playoffs looming for some teams, they often make irrational decisions and overpay. Right now, there are many FA starters available that won’t require trading prospects so teams have lots of options to work thru before dealing real assets for a 1 yr rental.

    Comment by Spike — November 8, 2012 @ 3:46 pm

  4. what!? kidding??

    Comment by Spike — November 8, 2012 @ 3:47 pm

  5. I guess it makes sense for the Mets maybe… ;-)

    Comment by Spike — November 8, 2012 @ 3:47 pm

  6. ” It’s all just a matter of price, as it pretty much always is.”

    and YEARS. especially for a 38 year old hard throwing knuckleballer.

    from what I read, they seemed to be amicable on $’s/year (15mil), but mets were offering 2 years, and dickey wanted 4.

    Comment by attgig — November 8, 2012 @ 4:04 pm

  7. unless a signing window was granted, like the Johan Sanata trade with the mets and twins. mets were granted a 3 day signing window so that it wouldn’t just be a 1 year rental.

    Comment by attgig — November 8, 2012 @ 4:06 pm

  8. and they’ll probably settle on 3. I assume the 3rd yr g’tee is what will hold up the works. I’m sure the Mets would like to make it some sort of option.

    Comment by Spike — November 8, 2012 @ 4:19 pm

  9. He’s not paid enough for the Royals to be interested.

    Comment by Chris — November 8, 2012 @ 5:14 pm

  10. Spike, are you kidding? Is there any team that wouldn’t make a qualifying offer of $13M+ to him right now? Why would that change a year from now?

    The Royals just spent nearly that much for Ervin Santana, a very mediocre pitcher. Of course teams would make that offer for 1 year of a CY Young caliber pitcher. Even if he pitches more like 2010/2011, he’d get that offer.

    As for 1 yr rentals, most rentals are in the last year of their deal where the salary is highest. They’re very rarely paid 25 cents on the dollar, like Dickey is with his $5MM salary. There’s not a single FA starter available that will produce anywhere near what Dickey will produce for anywhere near 1-year/$5MM.

    Comment by vivalajeter — November 8, 2012 @ 6:10 pm

  11. he might have another good/great year next year and then get overpaid by the team the mets trade him to, but that team would be okay with that to an extent because he only makes $5m this year (thus building surplus value), right?

    Comment by tyke — November 8, 2012 @ 6:31 pm

  12. The Yankees just made one to a soon to be 38yo who doesn’t have a Knuckleball to fall back on

    Comment by Tomcat — November 8, 2012 @ 7:49 pm

  13. Peter Bourjos!?! are you kindding me? Why do people think he is so great? This is the same Peter Bourjos people were saying the Mets should trade David Wright for last year. Am I missing something? Is Bourjos Mike Trout’s slightly less talented cousin?

    Comment by boom shakalaka — November 8, 2012 @ 7:51 pm

  14. I’m with you. Yea he’s just 25 and cost controlled, but he’s probably at his ceiling. Maybe a higher walk rate, but his skill is literally just speed.

    For Dickey, I’d say one B+ rated AA or AAA prospect plus one raw high upside C+ rated R/A/A+ pick plus an organizational filler AAAA guy.

    Comment by antonio bananas — November 8, 2012 @ 9:05 pm

  15. $13/year for even 2011 Dickey would be a bargain. I would put money on Dickey getting a qualifying offer after this year if he isn’t extended.

    Comment by BurleighGrimes — November 8, 2012 @ 9:50 pm

  16. I don’t get the Bourjos love either. If he’s on your team, it’s nice to get the cheap labor. But he’s not the type of guy you go out of your way to trade for. I feel like he’s the type of player you can get on a fairly cheap deal. His skills are undervalued, and is he really any better than someone like Carlos Gomez? You don’t give up an Ace with a great 1-year contract for Carlos Gomez.

    As for bananas, I’d pick the over on that deal. All it takes is one team to give up too much. They got Wheeler for 2 months of Beltran @ $16MM/year, and not many teams were in on Beltran. Every team will want Dickey on that contract, so I’d think one team would go above and beyond to secure him.

    Comment by vivalajeter — November 8, 2012 @ 10:06 pm

  17. Dickey will be 39 a year from now. It’s far from a lock that he’d get a QO a yr from now.

    The days of teams giving up prized prospects for 1 yr rentals is about over except when the heat of a pennant race is on… in mid-season teams often throw caution to the wind and will deal prospects for 3 month rentals.

    Comment by Stinky — November 8, 2012 @ 10:55 pm

  18. All I can say is, as a Mets fan, a Dickey trade would be a betrayal. There would be a similar fan reaction to the Knicks letting Jeremy Lin go, which was met with vitriol and a large exodus to Brooklyn Nets fandom.

    From the on-the-field perspective: the Mets could have a legitimately great rotation next season. Dickey is obviously great, Niese is good and could be very good, Johan obviously has the potential to very good, Matt Harvey was phenomenal as a rookie, Gee is a quite good back-end starter, and we have some minor league prospects in Wheeler and Familia who could be ready soon. Even if a couple of these guys don’t pan out, this is still, at worst, an above-average rotation. With that rotation, David Wright and three good young players around the infield, there is definitely a legitimate shot at the playoffs. Are the Mets the cream of the crop in the NL? No. But it really shouldn’t shock anyone if they are in the playoff hunt late in the year. This isn’t the Cubs or the Astros.

    Why would a team give up it’s most beloved player in years, when losing him would mean moving from a decent enough opportunity at the playoffs to basically having no shot, whilst gaining at best a pretty good prospect who will almost certainly never add the sort of value Dickey can add this season.

    Comment by nitro2831 — November 8, 2012 @ 11:48 pm

  19. I’m a Mets fan, a Dickey fan (and one of those aforementioned betrayed Jeremy Lin fans), and I want to see him get paid.

    This might not be a major thing but there’s also value for Dickey to stay in New York. He just published a book, been in a movie, and has another three (I think) book deal coming. Not that you can’t publish books from Anaheim or Arlington or wherever, but the added exposure of being in NYC is probably putting very real dollars into his pocket.

    At least that’s what I tell myself as I cry myself to sleep every night at the thought of him leaving…

    Comment by Rags — November 9, 2012 @ 1:04 am

  20. I agree with you. The Mets has a legitimate rotation. If they can stay healthy, they may get a shot; and if they make it into the playoff, their rotation may sail them to a title(see 2010 Giants).

    Comment by Kampfer — November 9, 2012 @ 2:54 am

  21. Not to pick on you but you sound like my fellow Mets fans friends. This fantasy that the Mets are a year or two away or a player or two away from becoming a factor needs to stop. This team has 75 win talent. They need to upgrade C, 2B, all three outfield positions, get a better year from Ike and continued improvement from Tejada. That’s asking a lot. And that’s assuming they pitch well. The owner has shown no indication that the payroll is returning to previous levels. This team couldn’t win 80 games getting almost 8 fWAR from Wright and a Cy Young caliber year from Dickey. Who are we competing with? Saying they “aren’t Houston” isn’t exactly setting a high bar. It kills me to say it but it’s time to deal Wright and Dickey and rebuild. Hopefully, in the next couple of years, Wilpon can either get his shit together and return the payroll back to the $140M range where it belongs or he is forced to sell the team to someone who will. Hopefully by then we’ll have a good cheap core to supplement with free agents.

    Comment by jpg — November 9, 2012 @ 3:19 am

  22. Dickey doesn’t have the wear on his arm that most 38-year-old pitchers do, and knuckleballers seem to be able to pitch forever anyway. Granted, he’s a knuckleballer like perhaps none before him — he throws the angry knuckleball — so he may not be quite as immortal as a Phil Niekro (who pitched until he was forty-eight) but he very likely has more than one effective year left in him.

    Comment by joser — November 9, 2012 @ 3:22 am

  23. I have been a Met fan since 68 (thats alot of disappointment). If you look at this team honestly, aside from Wright and maybe Davis (cross fingers), there is nobody in the batting order worth talking about. At this rate, by the time we have enough bats to contend, Dickey will be collecting social security.
    The time is right to trade him. We just have to hope Alderson makes up for the Pagan trade last year.

    Comment by Scott — November 9, 2012 @ 8:36 am

  24. The Mets are not the Pirates or the Royals. They do not need to value players as “fan favorites” to try and eke out a few more tickets sold. They are a major market team with tremendous resources. Yes, I know the Wilpon’s have financial woes at the moment. But the Mets shouldn’t be run like a small market team. They should make whatever moves they feel are needed to build a contender as quickly and completely as they can. If that means extending Dickey and/or Wright then that’s great. But if not, then hey have to be able to weather the PR storm and move on while they are assets with real value.

    Comment by David — November 9, 2012 @ 9:17 am

  25. I guess you haven’t been checking the direction of the Mets attendance the past 4 years.

    Comment by Spike — November 9, 2012 @ 10:11 am

  26. remains to be seen what kind of season Dickey has at 38 before one can conclude that his team (whichever one) would make him a QC. The point is that it’s much less a sure thing than it would be for a player 10 yrs younger.

    Comment by Spike — November 9, 2012 @ 10:14 am

  27. Spike: The Mets attendance has dropped because they aren’t winning. Attendance correlates better with winning than with anything else.

    You can make a financial argument … sometimes … for a smaller market team that it might be worth it on the bottom line to retain fan favorite players who’s contracts make it difficult to fill out a decent 25-man roster.

    The Mets, however, are bigger than that. If they can win then the fans will come. It’s that simple. If keeping Dickey and/or Wright makes it harder for them to win, then they shouldn’t do it.

    Comment by David — November 9, 2012 @ 10:35 am

  28. no doubt, but the team is going to crater more if they deal Dickey and possibly Wright. The runway is going to extend by a several years if they deal away their best players. As you said, it’s about winning and that means the Wilpons will have to invest more in this team. The Madoff excuses can only go so far. This team has an enormous fan base, a new stadium, a cash cow cable network, and more MLB revenue streams than ever before. But they have continued to hang onto the excuses of needing the wait out bad contracts. What will it be next?

    Comment by Spike — November 9, 2012 @ 11:19 am

  29. how often to GMs go out and gauge the trade value of a guy like Dickey, not just to obviously see what they might get, but to get a better read on what teams might offer him for a contract?

    if you try to trade him and see that everyone is offering a poor package, you might reasonably expect that he may not get a big contract offer when he’s a free agent.

    if you see someone offering Trout and three other prospects, you know that he’s likely gonna get a huge contract when he’s a free agent.

    ultimately, whether you trade him or not, it gives the team a little bit more information to use as leverage when making dickey a contract offer.

    maybe they’d normally offer him $10, thinking that’s fair, but because of trade gauging they’ve determined that the best offer he’ll likely get from other teams is $7, so now they can offer him $9, and even if he shops around, he can come back to the mets knowing they made him a good, fair offer, and weren’t trying to “screw him over.” in that sense, they can more or less remove some of the infamous “mystery team” leverage that crops up.

    Comment by MrKnowNothing — November 9, 2012 @ 12:53 pm

  30. - So you must be pretty upset after the Mets traded Dickey.

    – Sandy Alderson – I hate him. He made R.A. Dickeycry. The paper said that Dickey was crying.

    – R.A. Dickey? Is that what you’re upset about? R.A. Dickeymakes $5,000,000 a year. How much does your father make?

    – I don’t know.

    – You don’t know? We’ll see if your father can’t pay the rent. Go and ask Dickey and see what he tells you. R.A. Dickey don’t care about you, so why should you care about him?

    Comment by Calogero — November 9, 2012 @ 1:58 pm

  31. Stinky, unless his knuckle falls off, it’s a virtual guarantee that he gets a QO a year from now. It’s not like he’s a one-year wonder who came out of the blue to post a CY Young caliber season. This is his third straight season of solid production. Sure, injuries can happen to anyone – but I can’t envision his performance falling off a cliff to the point where he doesn’t deserve a QO.

    As for 1 yr rentals, that’s for the Mets’ GM to take care of. It just takes one team to give up an elite OF prospect for a pitcher who might have $20MM in surplus value next year (plus a draft pick as compensation). I can’t recall the last time a pitcher was available in the off-season with a 1-year contract that had this much excess value.

    Comment by vivalajeter — November 9, 2012 @ 2:02 pm

  32. I’m a Mets fan and I really like R.A. Dickey, but I would like to win more than I would like to see R.A. Dickey pitch. If the Mets could spend cash, then you keep Dickey and fill in the holes at C, and OF through FA, but that is just not the reality of the situation.

    The Mets are two years away assuming that Alderson can spend again once Johan’s and Bay’s contracts(not sure what the restucturing is with him) expire. Dickey brings a lot of uncertainty two to three years from now.

    I’m sick of the over sentimentality in the NY fan base when they in the same breath demand winning baseball. If you have deep pockets, you can afford both, but we can’t so pick one. Alderson better capitalize on Dickey’s surplus value.

    Comment by Dario — November 9, 2012 @ 2:50 pm

  33. “You don’t give an ace for Carlos Gomez.”


    Comment by dougiejays — November 9, 2012 @ 2:54 pm

  34. Isn’t that what Peter Boujos was, a B+ rated AA prospect? I mean, if you can find me a better deal that nets us a CFer, then I’m all for it. Bourjos plus prospects-Kole Calhoun- would make me happy.

    Comment by Dario — November 9, 2012 @ 2:59 pm

  35. Gomez’s approach rendered his bat useless. I think that I can at least hope with Bourjos, were I couldn’t with Gomez.

    Comment by Dario — November 9, 2012 @ 3:01 pm

  36. There isn’t a bigger R.A. Dickey fan out there than me. That being said, I believe it is a must for the Mets to trade him if the right prospects come on the table. We must look to the future as Met fans; and this is one of the few ways we have to make a successful future become a reality for this organization.

    Comment by BklynCowpoke — November 9, 2012 @ 3:09 pm

  37. well played, dougie. I hadn’t considered that the Mets traded him for Santana.

    Comment by vivalajeter — November 9, 2012 @ 3:51 pm

  38. Seems like Fangraphs always loves to push Bourjos on the Mets (see Cameron’s ridiculous article which stated Wright for Bourjos was a equal trade) when the guy is just not good. Don’t care how good the D is, he can’t hit and he’s a back-up.

    Comment by Dave G. — November 9, 2012 @ 7:01 pm

  39. as to your assertion that there isn’t any FA starter in RAD’s ballpark at that price, some teams would prefer to pay more than to deal away good prospects.

    Comment by Stinky — November 10, 2012 @ 7:28 am

  40. Bourjos and Conger would makes sense. They want an OF and C for Dickey (at least, so say anonymous teams officials). I think it would be a reasonable deal for both teams – no stars for Mets but potential solid players. Angels can afford to lose those two and get a potential one-year of ace-level pitching.

    Comment by Dan the Mets Fan — November 10, 2012 @ 4:19 pm

  41. Keep Dickey. The people writing off the Mets in 2013 don’t know much about baseball. They won 74 somehow last year with a zombie bullpen and black holes all throughout the lineup (Bay, Ike-first half, Catcher). With some breaks they could make the playoffs next year.

    I’d rather seem them trade some of the excess prospects for a decent catcher or stud CF then trade Dickey. This team could win 90+ next year with just a few breaks.

    Comment by rick j — November 10, 2012 @ 10:43 pm

  42. Good pitching can change things in a hurry.
    With Dickey, a full season of Matt Harvey, Johan Santana another year removed from shoulder surgery, plus Niese & Gee with several high ceiling arms at AAA, the Mets rotation has the potential to be very good if they can avoid injuries.
    The Infield is alright as well with Davis – Murphy (who improved defensively as the season went along) – Tejada – Wright.
    The C suffered from Thole´s concussion and the lack of a reliable backup for most of the season.
    The OF was atrocious mostly.
    And the bullpen was unreliable and often terrible too.
    The latter problem can be attacked with the pitching depth that´s about to reach the majors. Usually, good bullpens are built from within and not by signing veteran free agents. Josh Edgin, Jeurys Familia and others may well be answers to the bullpen problems – and soon.
    The OF needs to be remodeld. Kirk Nieuwenhuis is alright as the CF vs. RHP. Lucas Duda´s bat – if it rebounds to 2011 levels – is good enough to stick him in LF with a strong defensive caddy around. If they bring back Scott Hairston, he´d be a nice platoon mate for Duda.
    Still, a new fulltime RF needs to be added. Maybe a new CF with Nieuwenhuis switching elsewhere.

    This is a generally young team and odds are that players collectively improve than regress.

    So, the Mets should be open minded regarding Dickey.
    If someone makes a very strong offer that figures to help the Mets structurally going forward, by 2014 the latest, then sure consider it.
    However, Peter Bourjos as the centerpiece of a package seems to shoot quite low for now.

    Comment by DrDooby — November 11, 2012 @ 2:39 am

  43. Scott Baker refused a 9/mil offer from the Twins. Yeah who? If a pitcher of a Who caliber wants more than 9mil a year then CY Young caliber has beyond $10 coming to him. Heck A.Sanchez wants 15mil/yr! Mets are screwed with this 5mil option. They want to ship him then take the risk of signing him with their pitching prospects. His market value should be approaching 16-21mil a yr.
    Pretty much what a boils down to is either Mets pay him or you take a trade that Will Not bring a return one would expect! Any good owner will know Dickey becomes a free agent next season and can just pay him without letting the Mets loot their top prospects. It’s just a no-win situation for the Mets/Mets fans. The only guarantee win is that at 5mil for this season the Mets have arguably the best ARM for value in all of MLB!

    Comment by Chris K — November 11, 2012 @ 5:08 pm

  44. Yup.

    It’s ridiculous to claim the Mets are anything other than a major overhaul away from contending. Any scenario that even gets them to 81 games depends on the rotation pitching optimally and staying very, very healthy. That rarely happens.

    Comment by Jack Strawb — November 18, 2012 @ 11:16 pm

  45. “81 wins”.

    Comment by Jack Strawb — November 18, 2012 @ 11:16 pm

  46. The Mets can’t ‘spend cash’, though, and won’t as long as the Wilpons are in charge, so we’re in it for the enjoyment of seeing players like Dickey play.

    Comment by Jack Strawb — November 18, 2012 @ 11:19 pm

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Close this window.

0.265 Powered by WordPress