FanGraphs Baseball


RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. “The pitch results in the heart are almost always strikes (94% of the time called strike) vice the edges where a pitch is called a strike 2/3 of the time. Pitches in the heart though are more like to go for hits.”

    Is this another concrete and measurable thing to refine BABIP with? I hope so — because it would reconcile a lot of what those who hate BABIP complain about.

    Comment by Brian — January 14, 2013 @ 1:07 pm

  2. This is awesome.

    Comment by Ivan Grushenko — January 14, 2013 @ 1:14 pm

  3. Maybe, Maybe so. A little more work needs to be done, mainly nailing down the exact Edge Zone. Bill Petti will also be looking at this subject in the next couple days.

    Comment by Jeff Zimmerman — January 14, 2013 @ 1:16 pm

  4. Good work, quantifying what became evident in the few starts of Lincecum’s that I saw last season. Makes me curious about his success in relief in the post season. Part of it was velocity increase, but now I want to look at Pitch fx game charts to see whether his location was finer too.

    Comment by Cookierojas16 — January 14, 2013 @ 1:18 pm

  5. I can’t overstate enough how significant having a stat that helps explain babip suppression could/would be. Look at the 2012 Edge % leaders among SP and you’ll see some guys who suppressed babip quite effectively in 2012: Lohse (18.9%), Price (18.9%), Buehrle (18.8%), Colon (19.2%), McCarthy (18.2%), Vargas (18.0%), Verlander (18.0%)

    I am really looking forward to seeing more work on this subject, correlations to babip, and repeatability of this skill year to year.

    Comment by Scott — January 14, 2013 @ 1:44 pm

  6. Also of note: Mike Fiers appears below Lincecum on the edge% leaderboard….not even sure what a “small sample” is with this metric or how long it takes to stabilize but a dude w/ an 89mph fastball that tends to find the edges at a below average rate doesn’t scream sustainable in 2013 to me……

    Comment by Scott — January 14, 2013 @ 1:52 pm

  7. I would also love to see high/low pitches discussed through the lens of “Edge %”….i.e. would pitches in the upper and lower ~3” of the zone show similar results to pitches on the horizontal edges?

    Comment by Scott — January 14, 2013 @ 1:57 pm

  8. Sounds like Dave Duncan’s next project.

    Thye “formula” for Lincecum would be the same, focus on the 2-seamer. He needs a pitch that he can pound the strike zone with that moves AWAY from the barrel of a RHB (which would be the 2-seamer running in) and then do the same with a cutter facing LHBs.

    It goes without saying that you need to be able to throw the ball where you want it.

    Saying TL55 needs to learn how to pitch is like saying Mark Reynolds needs to make more contact. Easier said than done.

    Comment by CircleChange11 — January 14, 2013 @ 2:00 pm

  9. Uh, I think Dave covered this already. It’s not that lincecum needs to learn how to pitch – he had it, and has lost it. I’d say that’s not learning as rediscovering who he already was:

    Comment by AK7007 — January 14, 2013 @ 2:06 pm

  10. Why the “if” when talking about BABIP as a percentage? It is a percentage.

    Comment by El Vigilante — January 14, 2013 @ 2:09 pm

  11. Will part II address his indifference toward baserunners?

    Comment by Danny Knobgobbler — January 14, 2013 @ 2:11 pm

  12. This is fantastic, Jeff (and Bill). I remember seeing a tweet from Bill seeking feedback on a definition of “the black”, and so I figured something like this was in the works.

    I was actually thinking about looking into something somewhat similar, but you guys are miles ahead of me.

    I’m really looking forward to seeing more on this topic!

    Comment by Jon Roegele — January 14, 2013 @ 2:12 pm

  13. This is why I love baseball. Really interesting stuff. Has no one run a simple correlation between BABIP and Edge %?

    Comment by Jaker — January 14, 2013 @ 2:17 pm

  14. Check back tomorrow

    Comment by Bill Petti — January 14, 2013 @ 2:21 pm

  15. Will do!

    Comment by Jaker — January 14, 2013 @ 2:22 pm

  16. I feel like this is the beginning of vindicating the people who felt that saying pitchers cannot affect BABIP was oversimplifying reality. There are things other than home runs, strikeouts, and walks, and pitchers affect those outcomes in part by locating their pitches. Amazing work! Not great proofreading, but amazing work!

    Comment by Jon L. — January 14, 2013 @ 2:55 pm

  17. This is awesome. This could really lead to a better understand of what exactly can drive BABIP outside of luck or variations. When guys lose effectiveness and their BABIP rises, if it correlates in any way to how they pitch in the zone.

    Really great article.

    Comment by Wil — January 14, 2013 @ 4:09 pm

  18. Didn’t Mike Fast write something on BABIP and hitting the edges of the zone a while ago, or am I just suffering from the illusion that any interesting Pitch F/X analysis must have a Mike Fast article somewhere? Googling didn’t turn up what I was looking for, though I did find this by Dave Allen.

    Comment by Paul Clarke — January 14, 2013 @ 4:09 pm

  19. A correction is needed there. “Besides helping his balled ball data”
    Also may I suggest slowing down the heat map a bit so we can get a bit better look at it before it switches?

    Comment by Me — January 14, 2013 @ 4:38 pm

  20. However, Fiers did not excel due to a low BABIP, .320, but rather 9.5 K/9.

    Comment by McAnderson — January 14, 2013 @ 4:49 pm

  21. True enough but I would question his ability to keep the K-rate up w/ just a fairly average 8.3% swSTR rate….and if he’s hitting the edges at a below average rate then I don’t like his chances at maintaining a high called strike rate without serving up more meatballs. This of course all comes w/ the caveat that we do not yet know the predictive values of edge %….just pointing out another potential reason to be bearish on Fiers for ’13

    Comment by Scott — January 14, 2013 @ 5:00 pm

  22. So what led to Linceum”s success out of the bullpen? Increased velocity? Luck? Or was it easier for him to focus in shorter stints?

    Comment by Table — January 14, 2013 @ 5:03 pm

  23. Watching Tim always makes me think he just lost his control, period. When he throws strikes he seesm to be effective because he still has a lot of movement on his pitchs. When he starts to walk hitters, he was done.

    Comment by Hurtlockertwo — January 14, 2013 @ 5:03 pm

  24. This is great analysis. You guys have probable discussed this already, but it seems to me that location AND velocity, together, play a role. A high (have you done anything with upper and lower regions of the zone?) fastball is a much better pitch than a high change up.

    Also, is there any indication that a pitcher’s edge% in Year1 is predictive of edge% in Year 2 and so on? I would imagine it is predictive, but I would love to see the actual data to back that up.

    Comment by Noah — January 14, 2013 @ 5:15 pm

  25. Agreed with above. This is awesome. Looking forward to tomorrow.

    Comment by J. Cross — January 14, 2013 @ 6:07 pm

  26. Awesome!!!!

    Comment by BurleighGrimes — January 14, 2013 @ 6:35 pm

  27. For the pitch result data, is it possible to give us an average Lwts scale overall value for Edge, Heart, and Outside?

    Comment by dcs — January 14, 2013 @ 7:11 pm

  28. Right click on the image and select save as. Then you can look at each separately while still having the quick comparison to see the differences.

    Comment by Bip — January 14, 2013 @ 7:15 pm

  29. Plus, why should a pitch down the middle lateral-wise be called a “heart” pitch if it’s on the upper or lower end of the zone? Seems like you only go halfway here. Probably a problem in the lack of a fixed location for upper and lower. But an average of some sort would be much better than ignoring the vertical dimension of the strike zone.

    Comment by dcs — January 14, 2013 @ 7:16 pm

  30. I ran the numbers from 2011 to 2012
    Number of pitches in each season: R-squared
    All: 0.06
    100: 0.20
    500: 0.31
    1000: 0.35
    2000: 0.53

    Comment by Jeff Zimmerman — January 14, 2013 @ 7:46 pm

  31. How arrogant! Telling a two time Cy Young winner to learn how to pitch.

    Timmy just needs to be more fit. He will be better prepared in 2013.

    His work coming from the bullpen was awesome because he did not get fatigued. His struggles in 2012 had more to do with lack of physical shape. It was clear he did not have the stamina, the guy was terribly skinny.

    Also, his mental state and motivation was very poor. Righetti doesn’t have a clue of what to do with Timmy. To me the Giants broke Lincecum, mental and physically. They mishandled him. Nobody takes a dive like that, without other factors coming in to play.

    Lincecum did not forget how to pitch from one season to another. Maybe some day we will find out what really happened in 2012, maybe when Timmy leaves SF we will find out.

    Anyway, I dont have faith that Lincecum can recover in SF, I believe he needs a change of scenary, a different catcher, better defense, he has two years receiving the worst run support in comparison to the other pitchers of the SF staff.

    Or you can listen to Keith Law: he believes Timmy cannot continue to be a starter because of his age and the mileage of his arm,plus the fact that he cannot repeat his delivery for a whole game. But he can still be a wonderful reliever, as we saw in the playoffs.

    So please, show more respect for a Cy Young.

    Comment by Sonia H — January 14, 2013 @ 9:02 pm

  32. among SP (ones with enough pitches that I didn’t filter them out), best and worst Heart:Edge ratio (maybe Heart – Edge would be a better stat?):

    1. Fiers
    2. McDonald
    3. Dickey
    4. Johan
    5. Karstens
    6. Beachy
    7. Matusz
    8. McAllister
    9. Timmy
    10. Volquez

    1. Buehrle
    2. Josh Johnson
    3. Kuroda
    4. Haren
    5. Leake
    6. Big Z
    7. Lyles
    8. Lohse
    9. Hellickson
    10. Milone
    11. Price
    12. Garza

    pretty clear distinction there. the top list is a lot of guys with electric stuff whose results don’t match the stuff. Dickey is an exception to all rules, but it’s interesting to see Beachy. not sure what to make of him since (A) he was effective at preventing runs, (B) he might have been pitching hurt for a period of time.

    the bottom list is mostly pitchers without great stuff who survive on hitting spots. Josh Johnson is an interesting exception. surprising to see Big Z on that list.

    good stuff. looking forward to tomorrow.

    Comment by jsp2014 — January 14, 2013 @ 10:17 pm

  33. how rude! telling a 2 time Cy Young winner he needs to prepare more!

    Comment by jsp2014 — January 14, 2013 @ 10:19 pm

  34. Very nicely done. It validates a lot of speculation.

    Comment by chanelclemente — January 14, 2013 @ 10:20 pm

  35. Randy Johnson didn’t seem to have many issues with stamina and skinniness. Wonder why you think that his being skinny has anything to do with his recent failure.

    Comment by dafuq — January 14, 2013 @ 10:41 pm

  36. Is it just me or are there others who can’t tell if she’s being totally facetious here?

    Comment by chuckb — January 14, 2013 @ 11:33 pm

  37. So does that mean among pitchers who threw at least 2000 pitches last year, there is a 53% correlation between edge% in 2011 and 2012?

    Comment by Bip — January 15, 2013 @ 12:13 am

  38. Nice work guys. Gonna throw this out there without analyzing it but can you see any reason why his K% is still so close to career average?? This seems odd to me. Timmy often had one bad inning last year…Also, I love measuring things but we can’t forget how mental baseball is…no matter what a player is doing or what results are being achieved, most likely it’s because of something going on between the ears. Sonia probably has a point.

    Comment by StatsNut83 — January 15, 2013 @ 12:14 am

  39. I’m more inclined to call it fecetious.

    Comment by Antonio Bananas — January 15, 2013 @ 12:40 am

  40. I don’t think Big Z is surprising. He doesn’t “hit the corners” he “accidently misses and it just so happens to end up in a good spot”. I mean, 5.1 BB/9. It’s either that or Big Z tries to get too perfect which his pitches, which doesn’t really match his psyche.

    Comment by Antonio Bananas — January 15, 2013 @ 12:43 am

  41. It’s not likely fatigue, he had an ERA of 7.64 in the first inning, which is his second worst to the 6th. Obviously, you face the best hitters in the first inning and logically, the 2nd and probably 3rd innings would be easier. Then you have the survivor bias of innings 7-9 (has to be on his game to have been in that long).

    Comment by Antonio Bananas — January 15, 2013 @ 12:46 am

  42. Beachy was interesting in that space. Without delving through the entire list (I did take a peek at most), I think a lot of it comes from the fact that he throws five pitches, four of which PITCHf/x rate above average (the fifth, his cutter, is just slightly below average).

    Basically three different velocity groups as well (fastball/cutter: 91mph, slider/changeup: 80mph, curve: 72mph), which I think explains, at least to some extent, how he’s able to stay over the plate but still keep hitters guessing.

    Most of the pitchers on the top list have four pitches, and throw them at various levels of success – but none with as much success as Beachy’s shown all-around. Beachy’s velocity groupings are also a little wider than most everyone else on the list.


    Comment by cthabeerman — January 15, 2013 @ 1:06 am

  43. I don’t think you lose that kind of velocity at age 28 unless you have arm problems. His first inning woes are typical of pitchers with shoulder problems.

    Not everyone with a shoulder issue needs surgery, but obviously he will need to learn to pitch with lower velocity. Unfortunately, shoulder problems also affect command. But maybe with better conditioning and strengthening he can get some of that back .

    Comment by pft — January 15, 2013 @ 2:16 am

  44. Did you read the analysis, or just the title?

    Comment by Near — January 15, 2013 @ 2:51 am

  45. Balled ball data is my favorite.

    Comment by jimbo — January 15, 2013 @ 6:20 am

  46. In 2011 and 2012.

    Comment by Jeff Zimmerman — January 15, 2013 @ 7:55 am

  47. Where can I find edge % statistics?

    Comment by jdm — January 15, 2013 @ 8:39 am

  48. According to the theory here, he suddenly forgot how to pitch.

    Yeah right, he had an ERA of 2.74 in 2011, and suddenly he forgot how to pitch in 2012.

    His dive had to do with physical problems, at the the end it affected his mental state, he could not handle the pressure of losing so many games. He was better in the second half, but the damage was already done.

    Then came the bullpen, and suddenly he was good again. It was physical.

    It was reported one month ago that the Giants told him to gain weight in the offseason, and also, they mentioned some exercises for his shoulder that he should do.

    So yes, you may be correct.

    Comment by Sonia H — January 15, 2013 @ 8:51 am

  49. I also am glad to see that there will be more. This article, while interesting in that way Jeff has of making things interesting, really amounts to little more than SSS.

    Comment by Baltar — January 15, 2013 @ 12:41 pm

  50. Yeah, that was supposed to be “balled bat data”.

    Comment by Sam Samson — January 15, 2013 @ 12:42 pm

  51. Could be SSS. He only pitched a few innings in relief.

    Comment by Baltar — January 15, 2013 @ 12:42 pm

  52. Yes, those walks in relation to the other 4 pitchers are the one thing that stood out the most–more than the BABIP difference.

    Comment by Baltar — January 15, 2013 @ 12:46 pm

  53. The argument is he never pitched, he threw — but he could throw hard, and got away with it. Then physical decline took away that velocity, leading to bad results.

    This is where you come in. Your argument that “his dive had to do with physical problems” doesn’t refute the article. If anything it tends to support it. This article shows that although Lincecum got worse over time, he was always below average at painting the corners, or “Edge%”. If you wish to make the case that Timmy was a good pitcher not just a hard thrower before the physical decline, great — but you now have to make that argument, not merely resort to “he won awards, have some respect!”.

    Over to you.

    Comment by Sam Samson — January 15, 2013 @ 12:54 pm

  54. me want edge% too! I think this could go a long way towards explaining some of the unexplained (BABIP and HR/FB%) in FIP.

    Comment by slash12 — January 15, 2013 @ 1:57 pm

  55. This is where you come in. Your argument that “his dive had to do with physical problems” doesn’t refute the article. If anything it tends to support it.

    No, it doesnt. You are making that up.

    The article doesnt say a word about his physical struggles.

    Comment by Sonia H — January 15, 2013 @ 1:59 pm

  56. I think the only “project” Duncan will be working on this, or next season is trying to flirt with a cart girl at bushwood country club.

    Comment by Luke — January 15, 2013 @ 7:27 pm

  57. IMO there were a plethora of factors that affected what is may be the greatest decline of any live-ball pitcher entering a season with a sub-3.00 career ERA.

    . Never a pitcher who relied on command, suddenly he had even less of it, both outside the strike zone and outside it. He put more pitches in the hitting zone, and he no longer had as much speed on the fastball or the speed differential on his secondary pitches.

    . He had more release point problems than before, which perhaps made it easier to determine which pitch he was throwing.

    . His lack of command gave batters more of an opportunity to be patient with his pitches.

    . He had considerable difficulty placing his change up, often bouncing it in the dirt so early that batters who had swung it when it was in the dirt behind the plate had an easy time laying off. That is the pitch that had been Tim’s top strikeout pitch, but when not bounding it, he sometimes left the pitch up in a more hittable area.

    . Tim has a lot of moving parts, which has provided a delivery that is not only exciting, but had been immensely effective. It is also a delivery that is more difficult to repeat and perhaps to get back together, as well.

    . Tim was baffled by what was going wrong. He would have decent innings, followed by dominating innings, followed by innings in which he would get shelled. Try as hard as he could (and he was both honest about his bafflement and a hard worker to correct whatever he could come up with that might be wrong), he still couldn’t get out of his abyss until after the All-Star game.

    . After occasionally going to the stretch earlier in his career to correct command problems, he suddenly was highly ineffective with runners on base, allowing extra runs to score.

    . In the first half of the season he didn’t pitch in very good luck, particularly with some ineffective fielding keeping him from getting out of what turned out to be long innings. It left him out of the stretch more often and increased the length of innings, both of which were big negatives for him.

    . The long innings caused him to throw more pitches. He had a lot of 20+ pitch innings, putting extra stress on his arm.

    . Tim reportedly would have bullpens where the catcher scarcely had to move his glove — only to suffer a huge lack of command in the game itself.

    Tim has battled his entire pitching career, since he was very small growing up (something like 4 foot 11, 85 pounds in the 8th grade). The Giants have put together a winter program for him, and I expect him to come back strongly. His command did improve in the second half and especially in the postseason.

    He is endeavoring to return with more muscle, and he was already wiry strong. He felt he needed to increase his weight after he struggled in August of 2010. Then after 2011, he tried cutting his weight down. Hopefully this season he will have found the balance (both in his weight and in his delivery as well).

    It appeared to me that his command improved in the postseason in his relief appearances more than his velocity increased. He got his secondary pitches down more consistently, and his fastball was often high enough for hitters to have difficulty getting the bat up to match. He seemed to work the edges better. He allowed very few hits or walks, allowing him to reduce his number of pitches per inning.

    Tim’s arm is resiliant, and while it almost certainly won’t happen, he could have a lot of value as what I will term a “super reliever.” Mike Marshall won a Cy Young Award in such a role, and finished 3rd, 5th, 7th and 11th in MVP voting as well as 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th and 7th in the Cy Young.

    El Roy Face once went 18-1 in a lesser version of the “super reliever.” The closer has significant value in today’s game, but the earlier firemen put out more and bigger fires.

    In a “super reliever” role, Tim could achieve wins, holds and saves — as well as keeping the Giants in games that otherwise were appearing to get out of control.

    Won’t happen anytime soon, but it is a role I believe he would thrive in. He showed in the postseason that he was willing to put his ego aside in order to help the team.

    I doubt he would relish the role, but it is one in which I think he could add a variety of condiments to games.

    Comment by SharksRog — January 15, 2013 @ 11:52 pm

  58. My problem with this article is it’s opening assertion that Lincecum has gotten by in the past by simply throwing the ball fast. Not only do we know that velocity, even extreme velocity without command is not enough to fool MLB hitters, we also know that Lincecum has an amazing change up that has been probably his best pitch. I feel like the article just comes to a false conclusion from the get go, then takes a bunch of facts and creates a meaning that fits the conclusion. Included in a grouping of players who supposedly have better results with similar Zone% is a pitcher who had a FIP half a run worse than Lincecum, but an ERA a full 2 points better. So, clearly, the key here is that Tim needs to be more lucky.

    I’m not sure that a conclusive statement about his or anyone elses problems of this nature can be gleaned solely from the numbers. We have no idea what his medical state is. It’s also basically insulting to suggest that Lincecum ‘doesn’t know how to pitch’, when he in fact did so astonishingly well four years in a row.

    Comment by Dave — January 16, 2013 @ 12:38 pm

  59. I like to divide the strike zone into 9 zones. High strike, inside, middle and outside, (all strike zone) strike zone middle height, inside, middle, and outside of the plate. And, low strike inside, middle and outside. Clearly the zone in the middle both in height and width, for the most part has the highest BAPIP, and it goes down as the zones get further away from the middle. Individually some players are better on inside zones than others and vice verse. Timmy missed the edge zones by too much, throwing balls, and having batters just lay off those pitches. Control more than speed has been Timmy’s problem.

    Comment by bradley emden — January 17, 2013 @ 12:02 am

  60. I think with a lower velocity, batters were not as easily fooled. They were able to lay off of pitches out of the strike zone and not worry as much when looking for the change-up that he would blaze a fastball right by them. Clearly an improvement of both velocity and control would be the best scenario.

    Comment by bradley emden — January 17, 2013 @ 12:06 am

  61. Some comments here:

    . Tim’s problems are complex. One had only to watch one or two of his post-game press conferences to glimpse the honesty and wonderment with which he viewed his seemingly unfathomable problems.

    . Virtually all the issues mentioned in the original analysis and the resulting comments played a part in the perhaps unprecedented collapse by Tim last season.

    . Tim certainly knows how to pitch and has become better at it over the years, even last year. It’s that he continues to lose the ability to put the ball where he wants it, as well as to throw it as hard. He KNOWS how to pitch; he simply is having increasing trouble excecuting his pitching.

    . Tim’s decrease in velocity doesn’t hurt just his fastball; it also hurts his secondary pitches, since the speed differential is less. With less of a fastball, hitters have a tiny bit more time to decide which pitch is being thrown. And with less of a differential in pitch speed, the deception is also slightly less. Put them together, and the effect can make a difference — especially on balls in the hitting zone.

    . Tim’s great pitching was based in significant part on getting two strikes on a batter and then, as you mentioned, putting him away with his change up or other secondary offering.

    . Tim DIDN’T have four straight great seasons. 2008 and 2009 were great seasons; 2010 and 2011 were very good ones.

    . He did have bad luck in the first half (and actually pretty decent luck in the second, in part accounting for his much better pitching despite a lower strikeout rate). But he was also hurt by an inability to pitch from the stretch.

    Even though he improved it in the second half, Tim had an .887 OPS against with RISP last season, compared to .666 over his career. I realize last season is a fairly small sample, but most of that difference wasn’t based on luck.

    . When Tim was drafted, many considered his curve ball to be the best pitch in the draft. And in his first minor league season, Tim pitched spectacularly with just his fastball and the curve. Before his rookie season, he added the change up, and by his two Cy Young seasons, he had also added a biting slider.

    . Tim relied on getting ahead of hitters enough to get them to swing at the change up out of the strike zone. Particularly in 2008, that pitch was devastating. Now he has a harder time getting strike one and strike two.

    The analysis here was excellent. When I read it, I said to myself that analytical Giants fans already knew the conclusion of the article. But what the analysis did was quantify the problem.

    Ask analytical Giants fans — and likely Tim himself — and they will tell you that indeed his loss of command has hurt him more than the loss of speed.

    Tim is enough of a pitcher to overcome much of the speed loss. But if can’t throw the ball where he wants it, misses so far out of the zone that the batter has an easy take, and leaves too many pitches in the hitting zone, he can’t take anything approaching full advantage of his pithcing knowledge.

    Turn Tim into a “strike one” pitcher, and he can then put his pitching knowledge — and his reportoire — to good advantage.

    Comment by SharksRog — January 18, 2013 @ 3:00 pm

  62. Truth, and I’m sure you’ll see guys w/ constantly high edge % will also constantly have low-BABIP and outperform their peripherals.

    Comment by Joe R — January 23, 2013 @ 12:17 pm

  63. Could this explain why Zack Grenike have consistently had BABIP higher than league average? Before he’s traded to Angels I thought that is because his teams simply bad in defense. But then he sill had a terrible BABIP last year. If his Edge% is lower than league average, it might help in explaining something.

    Comment by Shao — January 23, 2013 @ 4:01 pm

  64. Where do you get all the data for these analyses?

    Comment by Nivra — January 24, 2013 @ 10:21 pm

  65. Probably a bit of each. Most starters can get an extra 3-4 mph on their fastball when they know they only have to pitch an inning or two.

    Comment by Doncosmic — January 25, 2013 @ 1:21 am

  66. I am also curious about this!

    Comment by snoop LION — January 31, 2013 @ 4:19 am

  67. Zimmerman needs to learn how to write. I found his writing boring and contrived, with such gems as “He has gotten worse at putting the ball on the edges as he has aged, but he was never good at it”. Take a writing or English lesson before you start criticizing Cy Young winners.

    Comment by skeptic11 — February 4, 2013 @ 6:47 pm

  68. Right. A pitcher who throws the ball down the middle is going to get a high percentage of his outs via K and walk very few guys.

    When he does get hit, hes going to get crushed.

    You’ll see high BABIP, high K, low BB, and assume its bad luck, when its not.

    Comment by Synovia — February 5, 2013 @ 4:20 pm

  69. “The argument is he never pitched, he threw — but he could throw hard, and got away with it.”

    There are plenty of guys who throw as hard as Lincecum did. Most of them aren’t Cy Young winners.

    The idea that Lincecum never know how to pitch is a bit absurd.

    Comment by Synovia — February 5, 2013 @ 4:27 pm

  70. Then the article says that as his velocity has decreased, his K rate has, when we see a weak correlation between the two (.3).

    There’s some good stuff in this article, but I really wish the author would stick to what his data is showing.

    Comment by Synovia — February 5, 2013 @ 4:30 pm

  71. be an author at an excellent source for baseball analysis before you start making dick comments.

    Comment by RA Rowe — February 7, 2013 @ 6:37 pm

  72. Not sure the reasoning behind the snide reply. The article states that he often touched 100mph from day one and thus the draft pick used on him then goes on to say that ability had left him but he had found control. Unfortunately, the writer had jumped to conclusions and did this at a time his xFIP was 2.20 which led to Maddux comparisons.

    Nonetheless, he has shown the ability to use ability instead of stuff to be a stud arm. Therefore, I concur that this is more a rediscover journey for him.

    Comment by Justin Whitlock — February 11, 2013 @ 11:21 am

  73. Can we say the horrid season Tim put up last year is both?

    Look, his HR/FB was absurd…that is plain and simple to see, unlucky. That will come down significantly and make a nice rebound to his performance. I will reach and say that this unlucky chain of events led to him reaching a bit and walking more people trying to pain the corners too much. But that is reach, he just plain and simple did not have his command last year.

    Did he not have his command because he no longer had the velocity to keep hitters off-balance? His BABIP was right inline with his career (.283, .304, .282, .310, .281, .309)…so I am not sure how we got onto this whole he cannot paint corners and thus people are smashing him for leaving it fat over the plate. That hit him just as well as they always have, except this year they got the fly balls to go over the fence.

    Look at all the projections for him ranging from 3.47-3.75 ERA and 3.14-3.58 FIP. He was mostly just flat out unlucky last year and is heavily predicted to regress to the mean. Despite all his shortcomings, weak fastball, inability to work the edges, he kept his 9+ K/9 (190Ks) so they are not exactly loving facing him. Get that LOB% and HR/FB ratio back into the norm and we will have the same pitcher we all though would be the 1st to get 200M.

    Comment by Justin Whitlock — February 11, 2013 @ 11:50 am

  74. The reason, as any Giants fan who follows the team closely would know, is that Timmy ill-advisedly packed on 30 pounds extra, mainly by just eating more food, for the 2011 season, then didn’t like how that felt, so he just dropped 30 pounds for the 2012 season. He had no guidance on doing that right nor with how to keep his body in shape given all the changes he put his body through.

    Thus that is why his being skinny has anything to do with his recent failure.

    And this makes sense. He started off the season unready and that preyed on his mind and he struggled. The ASB gave him time to regroup and he was actually the leading starter by ERA until his poor conditioning as the result of the rapid loss of weight caused him to be ineffective in his last couple of starts.

    That’s why he was able to pitch so well out of the bullpen, because he was able to get enough rest plus he didn’t pitch as many innings in-between appearances.

    If it was strictly the issues noted in this article, then he should not have been able to pitch so well after the ASB, nor pitch so well during the playoffs.

    Read this article plus listen to the video:

    This article, by another long-time Giants beat writer is also informative:

    Comment by obsessivegiantscompulsive — February 13, 2013 @ 10:03 pm

  75. I was hoping that the Giants would put him through some sort of program, but never saw any word on that, thanks for that info. His up and down of 30 pounds without a physical therapist or trainer guiding him just screwed up his body, I’m glad he finally got some professional advice on how to get his body ready for the season.

    The super reliever role sounds like one made for him. Too bad the big money isn’t in doing that, else he might be interested.

    Comment by obsessivegiantscompulsive — February 13, 2013 @ 10:10 pm

  76. One of the most compelling articles I read this year. Top-drawer. Very logical, yet advanced. Puts a new perspective with which to look at swing and miss % and compare it to location. Helps paint a picture of a pitchers ability by the numbers. Love it! Thanks guys.

    Comment by TempleofSports — February 28, 2013 @ 4:01 am

  77. Now I’m curious to know how Barry Zito’s edge% looks vs Tim Lincecum’s since Barry has been having an improbably renaissance while Timmy has been replicating Zito’s fall to an eerie degree. It’s been a breathtaking cross-performance.

    Comment by Ian A. — March 25, 2013 @ 8:45 pm

  78. Edge% should additionally contain lower portion and potentially a upper portion (based on bb results) of the heart of the plate. I think this would show how some pitchers gain success through that portion of the strike zone.

    Comment by Matt — March 27, 2013 @ 5:13 pm

  79. This basically supports what I’ve been telling friends and people on a few message boards regarding Lincecum. In the past his velocity masked his average (at best) command. Now that his velocity has decreased he’s not able to get away with the same location mistakes. His best chance going forward is probably as he was used in the playoffs. Unless he can figure out how to consistently have better command, but that’s always been an issue for him, even when he was a dominant pitcher.

    Here’s an interesting link to a John Sickels post back in 2008.

    Comment by hobbes2d — April 4, 2013 @ 6:33 pm

  80. Guys dont forget that lincecum was a time bomb since he was drafted due his arm action and poor mechanics. Is going to be really hard for him to have a good command right know qith that delivery. With the fb getting lossing miles his changup losses quality too

    Comment by Jesus Mejia — April 5, 2013 @ 9:32 am

  81. your expert knowledge of lincecum and the english language has been duly noted… or maybee jus passes me som dos XX pleaes

    Comment by wut — April 21, 2013 @ 4:21 pm

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Close this window.

0.269 Powered by WordPress