FanGraphs Baseball

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Neds an idiot

    Comment by Damon — July 31, 2010 @ 2:24 pm

  2. Faulty analysis Pat. Anybody can look at his YTD numbers without accounting for his coming off of a shoulder surgery earlier this year. Take a look at his stats over the last 5 or 6 starts. He’s turning the corner, and starting to resemble the pitcher he was last year.

    Comment by Scott — July 31, 2010 @ 2:35 pm

  3. Yeah, I’m sure it didn’t matter that in his last seven starts he faced the Astros twice, struggling Phillies, Mariners, and Pirates. As I said, ZiPS likes him for a FIP slightly above 4 the rest of the way, which is very reasonable. It still doesn’t mean it’s a good deal.

    Comment by Pat Andriola — July 31, 2010 @ 2:38 pm

  4. Joy.

    Comment by ChadMOKM — July 31, 2010 @ 2:51 pm

  5. Last time I looked, those were MLB teams. It’s not like he’s beating Bob’s Tavern at the local park in a 16″ softball game.

    Plus, the Cubs are picking up half of his salary for the remainder of the year, so the Dodgers are on the hook for 2.06 mil. That means he has to be worth .5 wins the remainder of the season to justify what they’re actually paying him. Seems very possible. Monasterios is currently sporting a -.4 WAR. Clear upgrade.

    Maybe you could share with me what the worth of the two prospects coming back to the Cubs is in dollars?

    Comment by Scott — July 31, 2010 @ 3:05 pm

  6. Don’t dismiss the trade just yet. Lilly will pitch well in Dodger Stadium and The Riot is way better than Joyce DeWitt. The Cubs will pay the majority of Lilly’s salary and Theriot makes nothing in baseball terms. It’s not a bad trade. Give it some time before you bash it.

    Comment by knebworth — July 31, 2010 @ 3:05 pm

  7. Brett Wallach is a 21 year old starting pitcher in A ball with a 92:43 K:BB ratio in 84.2 innings. Kyle Smit (22) is a relief pitcher just called up to Double-A who had a 46:10 K:BB in 50.2 IP in High-A.

    I never said Lilly wasn’t an upgrade. In fact, I wrote in the artivle, “While that’s an upgrade of about ~1 run per game…” so I don’t know why you are arguing whether or not it is an upgrade.

    The question is: does the marginal upgrade in the starting pitcher swap justify the prospects, cash, and the trade in second basemen?

    No. Lilly’s WAR added this season is pretty irrelevant if the Dodgers don’t make the playoffs considering he’s a free agent. Considering their position, I don’t like their chances. They may win 85 games instead of 84, or something of the like, but if he isn’t the tipping point in their race I don’t see how it makes sense at all.

    Comment by Pat Andriola — July 31, 2010 @ 3:15 pm

  8. See my response to Scott above. I don’t know why you think Theriot is better than DeWitt.

    Comment by Pat Andriola — July 31, 2010 @ 3:16 pm

  9. And he isn’t even worth the little he is making. Theriot could very well be done as a regular player and he’ll cost like $4-5m next season.

    Comment by Rob — July 31, 2010 @ 3:30 pm

  10. Joyce DeWitt

    Classic.

    “Come and knock on your door ….”

    Comment by CircleChange11 — July 31, 2010 @ 3:45 pm

  11. After a couple of starts in April, Lily’s K-rate has improved steadily from May to June to July as he rebuilt his shoulder strength. Reportedly he’s finally hitting 90 mph with his fastball again. He’s had and will continue to have a nice season. From a fantasy perspective, I like his prospects for getting wins in LA. The Cubs just couldn’t score runs for him.

    Comment by Shamus — July 31, 2010 @ 4:11 pm

  12. If you’re the Dodgers, why not take a chance… They are taking a risk, wasting a few extra bucks… it’s sort of a desperation attempt. They are definitely candidates for going through some rebuilding headaches very soon anyway. The Western division has lots of holes, so trying to jump 2 teams and a 7 game disadvantage is a major risk, but it isn’t out of the question. I think it’s a reasonable deal, even if it isn’t the smartest thing to do.

    The deal is for a clear upgrade in the SP rotation with Dewitt and Theriot both being very borderline players. You have the options for cheap replacement MIs in Dee Gordon and Ivan De Jesus still sitting around as well.

    Also… Why even try to estimate the worth of these two prospects… You’re talking about a 21 year old pitcher in A ball, and a 22 year old who just left A+ ball (not a very promising platform for estimation). Any analysis outside of their raw tools would be a stretch.

    Comment by baty — July 31, 2010 @ 4:20 pm

  13. The Cubs are a disease this year resulting in lots of wacky instability and undefined roles. I wouldn’t live or die by any numbers coming out of that place.

    Comment by baty — July 31, 2010 @ 4:30 pm

  14. Hell, maybe someone in the Dodgers organization can teach Theriot how to run the bases.

    Comment by MM — July 31, 2010 @ 4:45 pm

  15. I think you’re forgetting we have a player named Matt Kemp. If his baserunning is the result of being tutored by those within the Dodger organization, then I’m not holding out too much hope for Theriot.

    Comment by JY — July 31, 2010 @ 6:14 pm

  16. The Dodgers offense isn’t exactly dynamic at present. Inserting a second baseman who is inferior both offensively and defensively to DeWitt and lucky to be a wash with Jamey Carroll isn’t likely to help them score or prevent runs and, in turn, help Lilly win games.

    Comment by Joe P. — August 1, 2010 @ 12:10 am

  17. I know you are here to give your opinion on deals, but the Dodgers gave up a second baseman who wasn’t going to amount to much, and neither are the prospects they gave up.
    Lilly is much better than any 5th starter alternative they had in the minors or majors, and Theriot is better in the field than Dewitt.
    Ned did a fine job in both of his deals today, giving up next to nothing while improving the rotation and bullpen with Dotel.

    Comment by ray — August 1, 2010 @ 12:58 am

  18. Does this mean the Cubs will have to stick Zambrano back in the rotation?

    Comment by ck — August 1, 2010 @ 12:18 pm

  19. It’s a little funny to hear all the barking in Chicago about giving up Theriot. Hendry has had a few good moments as a GM and this is one of them.

    Comment by Ed Nelson — August 1, 2010 @ 1:45 pm

  20. They’re bringing up Thomas Diamond from AAA instead. As a Cub fan I’m glad they’re going to take a look at him. Zambrano’s not going anywhere

    Comment by jumbo — August 1, 2010 @ 3:03 pm

  21. I don’t think any informed Cubs fans are upset about losing Theriot. If the team tendered him another contract he would earn at least $3MM (roughly), and Mike Fontenot and Jeff Baker would cost another $1.5MM if they were to stay on the team.

    DeWitt lets them move on from all three, with Darwin Barney ready to step in as the backup middle infielder.

    And we got a couple arms, too. Kudos to Hendry for getting something for these guys.

    Hendry had discussed trading Lilly and then resigning him in the offseason, and he appears to have picked the perfect team to trade him to for that plan to work out. The Dodgers will likely not offer Lilly arbitration and risk paying him $10-12MM for next season, so the Cubs shouldn’t lose any picks if they do sign him again.

    I wonder if Lilly would end up with 10-5 right if he resigned? Probably not, I guess

    Comment by jumbo — August 1, 2010 @ 3:08 pm

  22. I came to this article expecting to see the most important aspect of Ted Lilly’s season discussed: his home/road splits. Everyone knows that Ted is an extreme fly-ball pitcher (only 29% GB in 2010/34% career). He has a 3.69 ERA and 1.14 WHIP. Base stats look good this year until you get to the 1.46 HR/9. But home/road splits tell a story.

    In 10 home (Wrigley Field) starts in 2010, Ted Lilly has allowed 14 home runs in 67.1 IP, for 1.87 HR/9. His slash line at home is .230/.278/.426 (.704 OPS), with a 4.28 ERA and 1.099 WHIP.

    In 8 road starts, Lilly has only allowed 5 homers in 49.2 IP, equivalent to 0.91 HR/9. His slash line of .245/.296/.391 (.688 OPS) and 1.188 WHIP are similar to his home line, but his ERA is only 2.90.

    The same thing happened to Lilly in 2007, while there was no such split in 2008. Last year, more were hit on the road, but 4 happened in one game @HOU and his rate (1.1 HR/9) was a career-best mark.

    Also worth noting is that Lilly has a -0.6 WAR as a batter according to FanGraphs. It’s not that big of a deal, on the surface, but his -0.68 WPA as a hitter when his WPA as a pitcher is only +0.46 (in 2 more games, starts in AL parks). He is only 2/4 on sacrifice attempts and, going from one anemic offense to another, he has proven himself largely incapable of helping himself (look at the play-by-play from his start against FLA in May).

    Comment by Dann M — August 1, 2010 @ 5:59 pm

  23. Seeing that teams will walk a batter to face the pitcher with men on, I wonder how many pitchers have a negative WPA (pitching and hitting combined)?

    For SPs, WPA seems like it is difficult to accumulate since anything that happens in the 1st 5 innings doesn’t rack up a lot of WPA (unless it is extreme).

    The WPA with the bat could also be due to the manager not PH for the SP with runners on in something like the bottom of the 5th, trying to get another IP out of him, when bringing in a PH would be a better move. MGL at Tango’s blog has been doing a lot of writing about this situation.

    I know a few have mentioned a pitcher’s contributions at the plate when looking at a pitcher’s value and even possibly as a “tie-breaker” in CYA voting, but it has minimal influence (such as Wainwright’s “prowess” at the plate).

    Comment by CircleChange11 — August 1, 2010 @ 10:48 pm

  24. Couldn’t the Cubs have gotten more for Lilly in the form of draft picks had they kept him and offered him arbitration? Wouldn’t they receive 2 1st round picks if he was classified as a Type A FA?

    Comment by CDK — August 2, 2010 @ 1:26 pm

  25. If the Dodgers get those picks now, it seems like this deal heavily favors LA by giving them a better chance to win this year and also a very good chance to pick 2 prospects better than Wallach and Smit.

    Comment by CDK — August 2, 2010 @ 1:29 pm

  26. Lilly would likely accept arby though, and a declining Ted Lilly at 11-12 million is not worth it.

    Comment by Matt Murton — August 2, 2010 @ 1:49 pm

  27. i miss you, matt.

    Comment by someguy — August 5, 2010 @ 2:05 am

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


Current day month ye@r *

Close this window.

0.134 Powered by WordPress