FanGraphs Baseball


RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Sounds about right. The pitching and defense formula figures to be a lot more competitive in the NL West than the AL East. With that said, Sandoval and Renteria on the left side of the infield looks to be below average, to say the least.

    Comment by Scott — March 16, 2009 @ 4:32 pm

  2. Thanks for the great analysis, depressing though it may be. Is it vain folly to hope for a Lincecum-Cain-Bumgarner trio pitching to Buster Posey in the 2012 playoffs? With Angel Villalona a hulking presence at first?

    Comment by Mark O'Connor — March 16, 2009 @ 7:43 pm

  3. Nice analysis. Although, the Sabean grade has to reflect his moves over the past 5-7 years. In fact, if it wasnt for last year’s turnaround in terms of organizational investment in youth, Sabean would likely have gotten worse than a D. But, the pre 2003 Sabean was a lot better. Kent and Schmidt were absolute steals…and he knew how to trade for the right veteran players to fill in the rest of the lineup around kent and bonds (burks, lofton, santiago, carter).

    Comment by Noli — March 16, 2009 @ 7:53 pm

  4. I think you’re a little too down on the minor league talent after the top four and aren’t taking into consideration the young talent on the major league roster that will stick around going forward. They have a high pick this year and a lot of payroll flexibility (despite the Zito contract) going forward.
    Sabean has done a good job of handling the minor league talent in the organization so not everything he’s done is bad. Especially considering that all of his moves this offseason were good values.

    I’m not a Giants fan, but I think you’re underestimating them going forward. I wouldn’t be surprised if they take the NL West 3 of the next 5 years.

    Comment by bikozu — March 16, 2009 @ 7:53 pm

  5. That pitching, with some hitting prospects and Buster Posey is can contend if given some peripheral help.

    Comment by Matt H. — March 17, 2009 @ 2:01 am

  6. Aren’t the Giants playing Gillaspie at third and Sandoval at first? Or am getting a year ahead of myself?

    Comment by Kevin S. — March 17, 2009 @ 2:25 am

  7. You have to wonder why owners don’t read write ups similar to this and say “Brian Sabean is THIS BAD? Jesus, fire him already”. I mean, it’s not like it isn’t common knowledge to the avid baseball fan (let alone the ones that get paid to know it) that some front offices just need to be turned over.

    Comment by Greg — March 17, 2009 @ 7:07 am

  8. Randy Winn is no longer a Giant. Sabean released him.

    Also, Gillaspie is a pretty darn good prospect. He will not be ready till 2010-11, and Villalona will not be ready till at least 2011, as he just turned 19.
    It will be Villalona at 1B in 2011-12 and Gillaspie at 3B, and sandoval will probably be dealt, IF everything goes right with Villalona and Gillaspie.

    Comment by Justin Haddad — March 17, 2009 @ 7:29 am

  9. What do you mean Randy Winn is no longer a Giant? That just isn’t true. As for the Giants prospects, they do have a number of players in the minor league system that look like they may be MLB contributors at some point – but most of them are still in the lower levels of the minor leagues. Since they aren’t the kinds of talents that the top 4 are, they aren’t top-100 caliber prospects at this point, but the ones that can keep producing the next couple years as they move up in the system will become more highly regarded. Just have some patience with them.

    With Sabean, the grade you give him really depends on the time period you’re looking at. The last few years he’s been one of the worst GM’s in baseball (with his former assistant Agent Ned even worse). However, it seems the Giants having finally shifted their organizational philosophy to focus on building a team through the draft. Sabean has been successful at this in the past (his Yankees experience got him the GM opportunity), and looking at the future of the Giants, we can see he is moving us in the right direction. So it’s hard to assign a grade I guess…an F for the recent past but maybe more like a B+ going forward as our farm system gets better every year.

    As for Gillapsie – we did bring him up to MLB at the end of last year, but it seemed more some sort of stunt – like it was an agreement they made to get him to sign or something. He doesn’t really figure into the MLB plans until a year or two down the road.

    Comment by B — March 17, 2009 @ 8:41 am

  10. Probably mean Dave Roberts?

    Comment by Andrew — March 17, 2009 @ 9:15 am

  11. That must be what he meant.

    Last year, Randy Winn was far and away the best position player on a team that has money and needs wins, and he’s under contract for another year.

    Comment by Teej — March 17, 2009 @ 11:23 am

  12. ahhhh yes, my fault. Dave Roberts got released. My bad.

    Comment by Justin H — March 17, 2009 @ 11:28 am

  13. Dave, I’m a big fan of the series, but this wasn’t one of your better efforts (IMO). And I’m not a Giants fan. And I think Sabean is generally one of the worst GMs in MLB.

    My problems:

    (1) I think you are short-changing the Giants’ farm system here. Sure, they have 4 great prospects and are a little top-heavy. But they have some other decent prospects like Henry Sosa, Rafael Rodriguez, and Gillespie, plus a few others. So while the middle tier of their system isn’t great, the top tier is awesome and the lower tier is fine. And this ignores a recent graduate like Pablo Sandoval, who apparently didn’t merit a mention either in the minor league or major league sections, despite his youth and successes last season (and this winter).

    (2) As I said, I think Sabean is a terrible GM. He should have no control over a team’s purse strings because many of his big free agent signings are just bad. But he really shouldn’t be knocked too much for the Pierzynski for Nathan/Liriano/Bonser trade. At the time of the trade, it wasn’t a horrible deal.

    Liriano had major injury issues and wasn’t any sort of great prospect, just a guy with a good arm and some upside. Him developing where many other traded pitching prospects didn’t develop was just blind luck. His last year in the Giants’ organization (2003) he threw 9 innings all year.

    Nathan was just a solid set-up man who dealt with a myriad of health issues and only had 1 good, healthy season. He had completely failed as a starting pitcher and while his 2.96 ERA was good, his 3.45 FIP was hardly irriplaceable for the Giants.

    Bonser was the headliner and he’s largely flopped.

    Pierzynski was a league average catcher for the Giants (2.0 value wins, .314 wOBA) and he was held down partly by bad luck (.270 BABIP in 2003, career .306).

    Even looking retrospectively, until Liriano puts together another healthy season or two, this wasn’t as bad of a deal as everyone makes it out to be.

    (3) I disagree with your assertion that Zito is the recipient of the worst free agent contract ever. Definitely one of the worst. But I’d take Zito over Darren Dreifort and probably Mike Hampton and Denny Neagle.

    Dreifort got paid $55 million to throw 205.2 innings with a 4.53 ERA and a FIP around 4 (with 25% of the innings out of the pen and 75% as a starter). That is $267,431.68 per inning (courtesy of wikipedia). Zito only needs another 94.2 IP to make his $/IP salary lower than Dreifort’s!

    Hampton was paid $121 million to throw 891.1 innings, earning $135,752.19 per IP. Zito only needs to throw another 551.2 innings to make his $/IP salary lower than Hampton’s!

    Neagle was paid $51 million to throw 370.1 terrible innings, earning $137,800.59 per IP. Zito only needs another 538 IP to pass Neagle.

    Comment by mymrbig — March 17, 2009 @ 11:35 am

  14. Yeah, maybe even two years. Sandoval is the starting 3B and Gillaspie is starting out at A+.

    Comment by marcello — March 17, 2009 @ 11:35 am

  15. I somewhat agree with your take on the AJ trade – the Giants knew Liriano had injury issues when they traded him, and unless he stays health for a substantial period of time in the future it’s really not a big loss. Bonser is closer to a replacement level starter than anything. Nathan, however, has been the best reliever in baseball since the Twins acquired him, and the Giants have been in desperate need of his services over that time. What makes the trade so bad for Giants fans is the fact that AJ was such a….we flat out released him after one season, and because we didn’t have a closer, it led to the Herges debacle, and then the Benetiz disaster.

    With regards to Zito, honestly, I wouldn’t be surprised to see him more or less out of the league within a year or two. His stuff is as bad as ever, his control/command has shown 0 improvement…at some point his 5ish ERA just isn’t going to cut it anymore. I really don’t think he’ll get to Neagle or Hampton, though he should pass Dreifort.

    As for Sabean, like you said, he’s been a terrible GM. It does appear he’s somewhat improving though, and it helps that the organization is changing their strategy to focus on what he’s good at, the scouting/development side of things. As bad as most of his free agent moves and trades have been, he also drafted Cain, Lincecum and Sanchez and restocked our farm system quickly with very good drafts and international signings – if he continues to focus on this side of things the Giants should start producing home grown players on par with well run franchises like the Red Sox or Twins. I never understood why a GM with a scouting background completely ignored that side of things for as long as Sabean did…

    Comment by B — March 17, 2009 @ 12:14 pm

  16. “has consistently overpaid for declining veterans (Matt Morris, Dave Roberts, and Aaron Rowand)”

    dont forget to add Edgar Renteria to that list…

    Comment by Andy — March 17, 2009 @ 12:44 pm

  17. The Renteria signing is a little hard to judge. The free agents who signed early this year all did so before the market imploded. It didn’t look like a terrible deal at the time, particularly considering what the Giants got out of SS last year.

    But you are certainly right that if the Giants had waited a month or two they probably could have had Renteria for 1/3 to 1/2 of the money. Pretty much every team that made early signings this year ended up overpaying because of the way the market developed. They paid 2007/08 prices, which were much higher.

    Comment by mymrbig — March 17, 2009 @ 1:48 pm

  18. Good point about Zito, but I was kind of being facetious with my 3rd point. Zito vs. Dreifort vs. Hampton vs. Neagle is kind of a worthless discussion because all 4 pitchers were almost worthless relative to what they were paid.

    I think Hampton will turn out to be the best of the bunch. I think his first 2 years in Coors were pre-Humidor, so they weren’t quite as bad as they look. Then he turned in 2.5 averagish seasons with Atlanta before the injuries really took hold. He was still overpaid, but the quality of his IP will probably end up being a good bit better than Zito.

    With so much young pitching in the organization, does Zito get to stick around as an overpaid #5 if he can get (and keep) his ERA around 5?

    Comment by mymrbig — March 17, 2009 @ 1:56 pm

  19. At least let Renteria play a real game in a Giants uniform before we throw it in with the other bad veteran signings. It may end up that Sabean paid more for Renteria than the other shortstops on the market, but he outproduces them. Someone else also might have signed Renteria early if the Giants didn’t, so they may not have had the chance to get him specifically for less (though of course they could have gotten someone like Cabrera for less). Basically my point is at this moment in time all we can do is speculate since Renteria hasn’t even played a game yet, let’s have some patience before we judge the signing.

    Comment by B — March 17, 2009 @ 2:42 pm

  20. I remember the giants insistence in starting over the hill mark gardner over joe nathan. now, nathan was likely never going to be a starter (if so, he would be marginal at best), but the mind set of the organization during the bonds-kent era was to build their team around veteran pickups by trading their prospects and not financially supporting player development. If they happen to let a prospect get through to the majors…likely a pitcher…they had a relatively short leash on him.

    Comment by Noli — March 17, 2009 @ 10:55 pm

  21. and i agree that the dreifort deal was probably worse, although one would reply by saying that the financial burden of zito’s contract on the giants is a lot more than the burden of dreifort’s contract on the dodgers (given the total contract, the amount of years and the different payrolls).

    but, i think the hampton deal was “better” largely because the giants basically gave zito what was at the time the largest contract ever for a pitcher. that means you think that he is the best pitcher, or one of the top 5 best pitchers, in baseball. at the time, he wasnt even in the top 10…or 15…perhaps in the top 20! Sabean outbid himself (i still dont believe the mariners offered him more) and gave ace/cy young money to a pitcher whose stats were OK, but not ace/cy young like. Zito was four years removed from his cy young season…and in those 4 years between, we saw his numbers decline to a 7-8 million dollar type pitcher. The giants threw 15 million dollar money at him because they wanted to save face after losing out on carlos lee and soriano and to try to prepare themselves for post Bonds with another Barry on the roster.

    Comment by Noli — March 17, 2009 @ 11:07 pm

  22. It looked like a terrible deal at the time. The market went south and now it looks like an atrocious deal.

    That deal was widely mocked at the time it was signed. Word was nobody else was in on Renteria for anything near that price.

    Comment by alskor — March 18, 2009 @ 5:04 pm

  23. By these standards, you know who was a great GM? Chuck LaMar. Drafted some amazing #1 picks.

    Sabean should have lost his job when he intentionally gave up his late first-round picks because he claimed the ROI was higher on second-rounders.

    Comment by Hawerchuk — March 20, 2009 @ 3:35 pm

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Close this window.

0.269 Powered by WordPress