FanGraphs Baseball


RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Nice

    Comment by ECN is gay — December 6, 2010 @ 10:46 pm

  2. I like putz

    Comment by Keith-in-Law — December 6, 2010 @ 10:59 pm

  3. As a Sox fan I’m sad to see Putz leave (especially when KW has previously pissed away money for less than stellar relievers like Scott Linebrink). At least we get a supplemental draft pick, I guess.

    Comment by Chris K — December 7, 2010 @ 12:15 am

  4. Huh?
    I expected to read about how the Blanks had reacquired Brandon Medders. Guess I got my putzes crossed.

    Comment by Victor Frankenstein — December 7, 2010 @ 8:14 am

  5. test

    Comment by puffy — December 7, 2010 @ 8:54 am

  6. Can you guys add monthly totals to your game log page? It would make it easier read. thanks.

    Comment by puffy — December 7, 2010 @ 8:54 am

  7. If you can keep Putz healthy he is a quality person for the bullpen. He has extreme focus.

    Comment by Jeff Wise - Baseball Hitting — December 7, 2010 @ 11:44 am

  8. im really curious about soriano’s next contract.

    Comment by phoenix2042 — December 7, 2010 @ 11:52 am

  9. That sounds unbelievably painful.

    Comment by Steve — December 7, 2010 @ 12:26 pm

  10. Extreme focus? Like superhuman feats of ocular strength?

    Comment by Choo — December 7, 2010 @ 2:04 pm

  11. This seems like a steal to me. RP WAR is worth more than other WAR, so he really just needs one season like 2010 and he’ll already have earned his whole contract.

    Comment by BillWallace — December 7, 2010 @ 5:37 pm

  12. RP WAR is worth more than other WAR? How do you figure? A win is a win, that is one of the fundamental precepts here at Fangraphs.

    I remember some people trying to make the case here last year that relievers are under valued due to leverage, but it wasn’t very convincing. Fangraphs does give relievers in high leverage situations a boost, but it’s not as big as you might think due to the concept of chaining. This means that you are not comparing the reliever to a replacement level player, but to the next best reliever in the bullpen.

    Comment by Cheese Whiz — December 7, 2010 @ 9:19 pm

  13. Not convincing to you maybe, but I’m convinced. RPs are really the only players that can be leveraged much, but closers are leveraged quite a lot. If you look at the numbers and don’t consider chaining it’s quite a lot, I forget the figures, but maybe 2-2.5x. Chaining reduces it quite a bit, but it’s still an important effect.

    If I have a bullpen who’s best guy is 1.2 WAR over 65 IP and you give me a guy who can give 2.0 WAR over 65 IP, it’s trivial to leverage him to add more than 2.0 wpa to the overall bullpen’s contribution to the team.

    Comment by BillWallace — December 7, 2010 @ 10:34 pm

  14. Peter Schmuck of the Baltimore Sun said that it never occurred to him to tell people that his name was pronounced “Shmook,” a la Putz’s pronunciation as “Puts”.

    Comment by JJ Schlong — December 8, 2010 @ 10:58 am

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Close this window.

0.262 Powered by WordPress