FanGraphs Baseball


RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. They need to get rid of the posting system. Let the player sign with anyone, but when the player signs, the team gets the contract amount as the posting fee. essentially doubling the player’s salary. And guaranteed free agency after the contract is over.

    Either that, or us team has to simply trade for the player for cash, and the rest of the player’s contract with the old team plays out, and again, free agency after that contract is over.

    Of course, that means big market teams are going to get most of these players, but it’s not like that’s any different now.

    Comment by Matt K — January 11, 2011 @ 2:08 pm

  2. Here’s an easy fix.

    The Japanese team has the right of first refusal in terms of accepting bids and can move on to the next team in line if they don’t like how the negotiations are progressing.

    The onus needs to be on the MLB club because they have no leverage, not the Japanese player.

    Perhaps start banning teams from the bidding process if they have a history of not signing the player.

    Easy fix.

    I can tell you one thing.

    Billy Beane wouldn’t keep bidding on players and then trying to lowball them if there’s a penalty.

    Comment by DIVISION — January 11, 2011 @ 2:13 pm

  3. I don’t know what Ramon Ramirez you speak of. Therefore, I am confused.

    Comment by Mike — January 11, 2011 @ 2:28 pm

  4. But who decides whether the team is low-balling or the player/agent is crazy?

    If Iwakuma and MLB team believe that the player is worth the same kind of contract that middling 30yo starters get in the majors [like a 3/$30M deal], there will still be the posting fee that the player feels isn’t his problem and the MLB team doesn’t want to tack on to that contract amount.

    If the player/agent is firm on that $30M deal and maybe the team is looking at more like 3/$21M because of the posting [and putting them at the equivalent of a 3/$40M deal], is that low-balling?

    I think the whole process requires that the player is willing to accept significantly below market value while the MLB team has to be willing to pay significantly above market value between salary and posting. In general I wouldn’t figure the two would come together all that often absent fairly small posting fees [granted until now they always have]…

    Comment by Eric R — January 11, 2011 @ 2:38 pm

  5. did you mean to use the word “ineffency” in the title? Or did you mean “inefficiency”. If you meant ineffency, can you direct us to a definition, or a usage note; I’m not familiar with this form.

    Comment by Phillies Red — January 11, 2011 @ 2:48 pm

  6. The New Oxford American Dictionary has no entry for “ineffency.” Does this word exist? What does it mean?

    Comment by Gary — January 11, 2011 @ 2:49 pm

  7. It didn’t go well the first time Akinori Otsuka was posted.

    “Oakland won’t have Iwakuma’s services, but recouped their $19.1 million posting fee, which was a large amount to wager on a 30 year-old pitcher with no MLB experience.”

    If he plays in the majors in 2012, he will be a a year older and, barring injury during the ’11 season, the team that gets him will have to pay $19 million+ in a multi-year contract. Yes, the total commitment on a team’s part should be less than a combined posting fee/contract, but it’s still will be a big gamble, especially after he comes off another NPB season in which the Rakuten club will use him as much as possible.

    Playing on a one-year deal in NPB doesn’t do any good for Iwakuma’s long-term financial success. And it can’t be a good situation for Iwakuma to return to a team that essentially said “good-bye” to him. Yes, he should help the on-field performance to a certain extent, but I also remember Akinori Otsuka’s difficulties with his last year in Japan when he had expected to be in the U.S.

    Comment by patthatt — January 11, 2011 @ 2:56 pm

  8. “inefficiency”. Duly corrected.

    Comment by Patrick Newman — January 11, 2011 @ 3:01 pm

  9. The current system also allows a smaller-budget team like Oakland to block the player from ending up with a rival by posting a huge bid, then lowballing the player until he refuses to sign. Then none of the bidding team’s rivals get the player, and the bidding team pays nothing.

    Comment by short — January 11, 2011 @ 3:02 pm

  10. @Mike: He is talking about the pitcher Ramon Ramirez who started his career with Hiroshima and was acquired by the Yankees through the posting system.

    Comment by patthatt — January 11, 2011 @ 3:02 pm

  11. He’s making about $3.6m (300m JPY) in Japan this year. I’d call that a financial success by most measures.

    Otsuka had a 2.09 ERA, 0.83 WHIP and 11.72 K/9IP in his last year in Japan.

    Comment by Patrick Newman — January 11, 2011 @ 3:04 pm

  12. Thanks. I corrected the link as well.

    Comment by Patrick Newman — January 11, 2011 @ 3:04 pm

  13. easy solution is to use the system they use in european soccer. the team holding the player’s contract is free to accept as many bids from other teams as it wants, though it obviously would only receive a transfer fee from the team that agrees to terms with the player. teams are free to price discriminate – you might demand a higher transfer fee from the yankees knowing that they are flush with cash. if terms are not agreed, then no transfer fee is paid.

    Comment by kamikaze80 — January 11, 2011 @ 3:22 pm

  14. “Perhaps start banning teams from the bidding process if they have a history of not signing the player.”

    The posting process has existed since 1998 (according to the Wikipedia article linked by Patrick), and Iwakuma is the first player to be posted and fail to sign with the team that won the post. Your rule may never have the chance to be enforced.

    Comment by Bryz — January 11, 2011 @ 3:22 pm

  15. Yes, but he was expecting to be making much more on a guaranteed multi-year contract in the majors from next season so, no, his forced return to Rakuten for another season does not help him long-term financial prospects, especially with the injury risks involved.

    When Daisuke Matsuzaka’s contract situation seemingly reached an impasse near the signing deadline, I remember very clearly how much people in Japan said it would be very “strange” for him to return to the Lions for another year after they said “good-bye” to him. (I was there in Japan about 15 minutes away from the Seibu Dome.) Therefore, I have the opinion that Iwakuma’s return to the Eagles may not go particularly well for this reason and others. To be fair, his impact on the Eagles and NPB overall has not been anywhere near the same that Matsuzaka’s was, but when he said he was moving on, he needed to go.

    I don’t have a link right now, but I remember the first time Akinori Otsuka was supposed to be posted, it was bungled by his team. Maybe it was while he was still with the Buffaloes and they still had bad feelings about their players moving to the U.S. after the Nomo situation. (You might want to look into this since you are writing about the posting system in this article.)

    Comment by patthatt — January 11, 2011 @ 3:38 pm

  16. I am familiar with the Otsuka posting — he was with Kintetsu, and it was reported that the made a mistake with the filing. There were no takers for him, and he and Kintetsu couldn’t agree to a contract after that. So Chunichi picked him up in a cash trade, and he had a very good year and was posted for a small amount.

    As for Iwakuma returning to the Eagles, we’ll just have to see how it goes.

    Comment by Patrick Newman — January 11, 2011 @ 3:50 pm

  17. How about the posted player can negotiate with any MLB team they’d like and their former team takes a percentage of that?

    Comment by Eric R — January 11, 2011 @ 3:54 pm

  18. ineffency / verb/ The inability of a team to sign a player after winning the right to negotiate with them through an exorbitant posting fee, because said player doesn’t care what they had to pay to negotiate with him, only what he will actually earn; conversely, said team doesn’t care what said player makes, but only what said player costs them overall.

    Comment by Pig.Pen — January 11, 2011 @ 4:23 pm

  19. That makes so much sense it’s impossible to imagine it ever being implemented.

    Comment by short — January 11, 2011 @ 4:43 pm

  20. Two of the best Japanese free agent signings have been Kaz Sasaki and Takashi Saito. Were either of them posted?

    Comment by Alex Remington — January 11, 2011 @ 4:45 pm

  21. Some reports said Otsuka made mistakes, but the Otsuka side blamed the team, from my recollection. It’s hard to know who was telling the truth, but it was pretty clear to me at the time that the Buffaloes didn’t want to lose a key pitcher to an MLB team. (If you recall the Jeremy Powell contract situation a few years back between the Buffs and the Hawks, it’s easy to see how the “he said, they said” thing can get going, even when the paperwork should make it clear who was right, and who was wrong.)

    To Otsuka’s credit, he pitched well to finish out his time in Japan, but my initial point about him was to say that his first posting failed.

    Yeah, we’ll have to see how Iwakuma’s 2011 season plays out. To his credit, Otsuka pitched well his last two years in Japan, even though he had a tremendous amount of animosity towards the Buffaloes. (I was off a year.) He pitched well for the Dragons, but it was widely reported about how unhappy he was to still be in Japan. One would think Iwakuma to have plenty of motivation to pitch well heading into his FA year. (He’d better keep his fingers crossed to avoid the injury bug, though.)

    Comment by patthatt — January 11, 2011 @ 4:51 pm

  22. Sasaki went to the Mariners as an FA. IIRC, the Yokohama BayStars really misused him his final season when he had an injury. This is something Iwakuma needs to be careful about considering that Rakuten can expect no compensation after their top pitcher leaves for MLB in ’12.

    Saito was an FA too-from my memory. I remember seeing him work as both a starter and a reliever his last year with the BayStars. He really found his niche in the majors as a full-time reliever.

    Comment by patthatt — January 11, 2011 @ 5:00 pm

  23. The top-tier starting pitching market is thin next year, as a result the extensions that Verlander/Felix/Josh Johnson/etc. signed.

    If Yu Darvish is posted, I think he’ll have a $75M posting fee. And the two teams with the greatest incentive to pay that are the Yankees and the Red Sox, because it wouldn’t count against their lux tax payments.

    Since the Yanks lost out on Lee and the Red Sox entire rotation is signed long-term, I’m going to guess that Darvish is posted next winter, Yanks win the bid for $75M, and he signs a 6 year, ~$70M deal.

    Comment by notsellingjeans — January 11, 2011 @ 6:18 pm

  24. I’ll go on the record as saying I’d be pretty surprised if Darvish attracts a posting bid that high.

    Comment by Patrick Newman — January 11, 2011 @ 6:40 pm

  25. ^^^^ i have to agree, as its rather high.

    now i do believe Yu Darvish will most likely be coming to the MLB next season( assuming no injuries, posting/contract issues, etc..), but does this devalue Iwakuma when contract time roles around next year?

    Comment by halebm — January 11, 2011 @ 7:26 pm

  26. Yes, that is the inefficiency in the method. The first price sealed bid auction is perfectly efficient. His example of seeing the other teams bids completely ignores tons of auction theory. Obviously, other teams could then see Oakland’s bid too then and would change their bid accordingly.

    Comment by Barkey Walker — January 11, 2011 @ 7:32 pm

  27. I don’t think there would be a posting fee paid for the rights to Darvish under any circumstances in excess of the $51 million paid for Matsuzaka.

    Depending on his pitching and health by the end of ’11, I can imagine a few teams putting in hefty bids in the $40-50 million range. But I doubt any team goes as far as the RedSox did several years ago-regardless of Darvish’s potential in the majors-because it’s easy to imagine Darvish wanting $60-70 million of whatever a team is going to invest in acquiring him for his own money.

    Yu Darvish is also getting divorced from his wife, Saeko, and we’ll have to see how that affects his thinking about an overseas move, taking into consideration his two children, and how different Japan generally is from the U.S. on child custody going to one family and the other side having little, if any, contact or visitation rights. Maybe it will be a problem for him, maybe not.

    Comment by patthatt — January 11, 2011 @ 8:03 pm

  28. Posting fees are in the tens of millions of dollars. What’s to prevent the player from signing a one-year deal – which would only bring a small posting fee to the original team – then cashing in the next off-season? Plenty of players would take the risk if it means they’d be receiving an extra $20MM instead of their old team making that money.

    Comment by vivalajeter — January 11, 2011 @ 9:30 pm

  29. Problem with scenario 1: Player can sign a one-year deal, then cash in a year from now. Let’s say he’s worth $20MM/year, but he’ll only get $10MM through this process (with the other $10MM going to his old team). He can sign a 5 year, $50MM contract as one option. Or he can sign a 1 year, $10MM contract – and next off-season, sign for 4 years and $80MM. He risks injury (or futility), but can make an additional $40MM by signing a one-year deal.

    Problem with scenario 2: If the player is underpaid, he shouldn’t be penalized in the US for that – he should be able to get what the market will pay.

    Comment by vivalajeter — January 11, 2011 @ 9:41 pm

  30. I would also suggest Aki Iwamura as a successful posting and resulting performance.

    Comment by Joe — January 11, 2011 @ 10:18 pm

  31. Japanese agents should not be allowed to compare their players’ talent and track record with MLB players. That Barry Zito comp was a giant red flag that Iwakuma would never be in an Oakland uniform.

    Comment by PL — January 12, 2011 @ 12:58 am

  32. IMO there’s an easier way to fix this: the Japanese team is guaranteed one half or a third of the posting fee.

    Comment by jimmy1138 — January 12, 2011 @ 6:57 am

  33. A’s overpaid hugely on the posting fee, so possibly just tried to block Seattle and Texas. That’s a big hole in the posting process: teams are not penalized for doing that.
    A possible solution (apart from the one I posted below): the MLB team is forced to accept the player with him retaining his contract from Japan but gets the possibility to negotiate a contract extension.

    Comment by jimmy1138 — January 12, 2011 @ 7:11 am

  34. Where do you get your total team salary data? I’ve seen some websites say most teams only have $2 million in payroll and another say $20 million and up.

    Comment by My echo and bunnymen — January 12, 2011 @ 10:41 am

  35. If he’s an MLB player, the ball is most likely to drop on the “it won’t be a problem for him” side. Strange he’s getting a divorce (if he truly is), in Nihon/Nippon that’s looked down upon, much more so than in the U.S.A.

    Comment by My echo and bunnymen — January 12, 2011 @ 10:45 am

  36. I got it out of an edition of a print magazine called Weekly Baseball that was published last spring. NPB payrolls range from about $18m (Hiroshima) to $45-50m (Yomiuri). Most payrolls are in the $20m’s.

    Comment by Patrick Newman — January 12, 2011 @ 10:52 am

  37. jimmy, my understanding is that he didn’t have a long-term deal in Japan. He re-signed with his old team after things fell through with Oakland. So your solution wouldn’t have any impact here.

    Comment by vivalajeter — January 12, 2011 @ 11:57 am

  38. Actually Iwakuma was going in to the third year of a three-year contract. They would have released his rights if he agreed to a deal with Oakland.

    Comment by Patrick Newman — January 12, 2011 @ 12:39 pm

  39. Thanks for the info, Patrick. I saw that he re-signed with them and assumed that his contract had ended.

    In this case, I think it makes jimmy’s idea even worse. No team would pay a huge posting fee if it meant they can potentially be stuck with a one-year contract. When the Sox posted $51MM for Dice-K, they figured they can average that out over the course of a long contract. They wouldn’t have paid that much if Dice-K might only be around for one year.

    Comment by vivalajeter — January 12, 2011 @ 1:36 pm

  40. And his wife is super-hot.

    Didn’t Darvish go on record a few years ago as saying he didn’t want to come to America?

    Comment by Bobby Ayala — January 12, 2011 @ 2:24 pm

  41. Obviously the A’s just blocked their AL West rivals– their posting fee was almost 3 times as much as anyone else, then they immediately offered him an unacceptably low deal which they wouldn’t budge on. I don’t think they ever had any intention of signing him.

    Comment by Bobby Ayala — January 12, 2011 @ 2:27 pm

  42. I don’t understand why this A’s thing doesn’t happen every time. Why don’t the Rays just bid $300 million on every good player? And then offer them a contract for the remaining length of their prime at MLB minimum. It must be like…. ethics or something

    Regardless, this system is retarded.

    Comment by BillWallace — January 12, 2011 @ 9:53 pm

  43. really blocking a 30 year old 5th starter with No MLB experience. I really doubt the blocking texas and seattle theory.

    Comment by David — January 12, 2011 @ 10:13 pm

    http://www.charm999. com

    —–If you think our website is good , you can put this website to your bookmarks or other places ,easy to find

    Comment by sdgsdr — January 13, 2011 @ 7:16 am

  45. Dima logistics post how are you men ?

    Comment by dimass — January 21, 2011 @ 6:47 pm

  46. Excellent article it is definitely. My mother has been seeking for this content.

    Comment by pedrockhussain — February 9, 2011 @ 10:20 am

  47. Theme rullez :)

    Comment by Hoagmaesobogy — March 23, 2011 @ 10:26 pm

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Close this window.

0.252 Powered by WordPress