Will the players union allow this? According to what I’ve been reading, the Phillies deal is for way less than the NYY or the Rangers deal. I dunno exactly how they work, but don’t they get upset when players sign for less than they could?
Holy cow. “Breaks the Richter scale,” indeed. I’m absolutely stunned – I had no idea that the Phillies were anywhere close to having the payroll necessary for a move like this (and for that matter, maybe they don’t really have the money, and this is going to come back to bite them). But yeah, the idea of Roy Oswalt as a fourth starter just makes me giggle; this is a truly outrageous rotation now. Certainly, if all four stay healthy and the Phillies happen to win the World Series (which is still just as unlikely as it is for any other good team), this rotation will be remembered pretty much forever.
Comment by AustinRHL — December 14, 2010 @ 12:37 am
The Yankees have got to pissed. Unless they go and trade for someone significant, I can realistically see them finishing 4th in the AL East. Tampa, Boston, and Toronto all have better rotations and comparable lineups. The Yanks are in trouble.
Spoiler about the Phillies having the necessary funding:
They just saw an opportunity and took it. Championships last forever.
Comment by Matt Defalco — December 14, 2010 @ 12:42 am
Ruban Amaro is very confusing as to how he goes about his business, but he sure can get the job done when he has something in mind.
First he trades Lee to restock his system after the Halladay deal, only to be lambasted…he instead retains and resigns Joe Blanton…then he trades prospects for Oswalt…then he goes out and signs Lee anyway. This is all during a time where the Phillies’ payroll seems stretched to its limits, and Ryan Howard gets a $25 million annual salary.
I will never understand it, but having 4 All-Star pitchers, 3 with year in and year out Cy Young aspirations (Oswalt used to be in this category, but no longer is), an infield full of MVP trophies, and a very good back-end of the bullpen is a hell of a noteworthy roster.
But now I’m reading that they don’t, in fact, have the payroll, and would probably send Oswalt or some other highly paid player elsewhere, so perhaps all of this talk is premature. And considering that the rumors are putting the contract in the neighborhood of 5/100, the idea of the player’s union nixing the deal actually seems plausible. There’s a lot to follow over the next few days.
Comment by AustinRHL — December 14, 2010 @ 12:44 am
How do they late 80s As and early 70s Os compare here?*
Or did the Sox ever have schilling, Pedro, Lowe and wake *slotted* as their starters?
What a stunner of a move. You gotta think Cliff woke up after the last two postseasons and went with the best pitching staff that would be pay him 100+. Credit to Ruben for making an entertaining gamble for us all to watch.
Comment by Oddibe McBlauser — December 14, 2010 @ 12:44 am
“Until then, though, there’s one question staring us in the face – Why did they trade him in the first place?”
Really? Cuz, you see, the giants still beat all four of those pitchers soundly.
Comment by Oddibe McBlauser — December 14, 2010 @ 12:49 am
On trying to understand Amaro’s (and Lee’s) approaches; what makes this deal so fascinating is that it shows an about-face change in both their perspectives from a year ago (exactly!) until now. I think the Giants really affected the opinions of both Amaro and Lee a great deal on what it takes to get a ring in the next few years.
Comment by Oddibe McBlauser — December 14, 2010 @ 12:50 am
Player’s union won’t; why do you think Lee waited for Werth and Crawford to sign?
Comment by Oddibe McBlauser — December 14, 2010 @ 12:53 am
What would the players union say if the Comissioner’s Office voided the Jayson Werth deal because it was too far out of line with other offers?
They may not like Cliff Lee’s decision, but they have nothing to say about it — it’s the players’ right to choose the situation that they feel is best for themselves.
Comment by Nathaniel Dawson — December 14, 2010 @ 12:55 am
So what’s the worry on the part of bloggers everywhere? It seems like people are mentioning it quite a bit, but I don’t understand what the issue is if the player’s union can’t do anything to the deal.
Comment by AustinRHL — December 14, 2010 @ 12:56 am
ZOMG U SO STOOOPI—-
takes .4 seconds to scroll over your name
Doesn’t miss joke
The Yankees are returning pretty much everyone from a 95-win team (albeit a year older). The Rays just lost Carlos Lee and Carl Crawford. Toronto’s lineup is short a few all-stars. Tell me again how they Yankees are finishing 4th?
Comment by BermudaDelta — December 14, 2010 @ 12:57 am
4th? yea theyre going to cruise into second place the whole season as the red sox cruise in first! its almost a lock barring catastrophic injuries on both sides.
Comment by phoenix2042 — December 14, 2010 @ 12:57 am
Do you think they’re going to keep all four? The last time there was an ML rotation that looked like this, one of the components was traded for prospects…
Here’s what’s scary: They have enough elite arms to get Kansas City to take Blanton and Ibanez along with at least three legitimate #3 or better young arms, all right handed, which the Royals need since they are very lefty heavy, plus a couple toolsy outfielders, not Brown. Royals have tons of payroll space. I see this as a legitimate option since Ruben now made anything possible and nobody else is going whatever it takes, for example Texas taking Martin Perez off the table in the Grienke talks, Drabek off the table for Toronto. Ruben Amaro is my new favorite GM.
Now dump blanton on the royals, giving them a few solid spects, and get Greinke. HaHa
Comment by nolanryan — December 14, 2010 @ 12:59 am
what is the union’s actual jurisdiction in deals?
Comment by phoenix2042 — December 14, 2010 @ 1:00 am
SI_JonHeyman: “lee received about $115 mil for 5 years plus 6th yr vesting option w/ makeable incentives. thats slightly higher AAV than yankees offer”
Oh, Saint Cliff!
Comment by Oddibe McBlauser — December 14, 2010 @ 1:04 am
I’m going to assert my right to be slightly offended as a Braves’ fan still religiously attached to those 90s era teams. The 1993-1995 you used as comparison isn’t a three year timespan. There was a strike in there which helps depress the WAR from those Braves starters by approximately 13.5% (since that’s how much playing time was cut from that three year span.) Greg Maddux could have been over 26 WAR with another 13-14 starts, and as good as Halladay has been, it’s not right to compare him to THAT Maddux. I’m also not sure if Fangraphs’ WAR is fair to Tom Glavine who was notably able to outperform his peripherals year to year.
Still, I’m a little shocked at this. Phillies’ management looks kind of brilliant, since they were able to trade Cliff Lee, get something for him, then get him back at below the going rate.
I look forward to see the eventual assessment of the net value from the Phils on the various Lee transactions
1 year of Lee last year at 9 (or 11?)mil + losing #1 pick vs the 3 prospects they got. (not to mention they may not have had to go to a 5yr 100mil, with a reported 6th vesting year if Lee was extended instead of signed as a FA)
Also worth fixing Cole Hammels is very good but legit #1? Is ryan Dempster a legit #1 (he has a higher 3 year WAR then Cole)? Mark Buerhle? Danks? (both about the same WAR totals) One has to be careful about simply using WAR to determine #1 pitcher.
How’s this for a number? 6.6 That was Halladay’s WAR last year which was almost one full win less than his WAR against the overrated AL East. If he was really the “best pitcher in baseball”, why didn’t his WAR go up in the supposedly inferior NL?
In addition, his strand rate was unsustainably high, his GB% is trending downwards and his BABIP was too low for his LD & GB rates. I’ll take the pitcher who’s 7 years younger and on the way up instead of a pitcher on the downside of his career.
Comment by Anti-Ryan — December 14, 2010 @ 1:17 am
He was one of the greatest but that Maddux also had that old strike zone that gave him six inches off the plate. And the bastard hit it whenever he wanted! I wish someone had told him that he was throwing a baseball and not darts.
They can just have the players defer their salaries like Colangelo did after the D’backs won the ’02 world series with Johnson, Schilling & Company. That worked out well.
Comment by BlackSwan — December 14, 2010 @ 1:38 am
I’m just as guilty as the next guy for knocking Amaro in the past, but wow. Way to go, man. He’s made some strange decisions in the past, but he has a damn fine team to run out there. And in the end, I suppose that’s what matters most.
A year ago, Lee was interviewed and said a player would be stupid to leave money on the table. And now he goes and does just that to return to a team he loved. Good on him. And good for Phillies fans everywhere.
Comment by Bodhizefa — December 14, 2010 @ 1:39 am
Glavine really benefitted from this, too. Maybe moreso, because he really started to fall off when technology was introduced and umpires started being graded, while Mad Dog still had some dominant years before his decline.
But things still certainly aren’t perfect. I remember watching a good bit of that perfect game Halladay threw against the Marlins and being shocked by how wide of a strike he was getting, especially with full counts to Hanley Ramirez.
Lincecum being a power pitcher, it’s also necessary to point out that while he has 200 fewer starts and 1500 fewer innings than Halladay, Lincecum has thrown only 15,000 fewer pitches. What that breaks down to is 39% of the starts; 36.7% of the innings; and 47.7% of the pitches. While it’s dangerous to talk about bullets in the gun, calendar years are only part of the age discussion. Halladay’s 6’6″ and 230 pound build is better equipped to handle aging than is the Iversonian body of Tim Lincecum. And Tim Lincecum has already in his MLB career thrown almost half as many pitches in just 3.67 years as Doc has thrown in a bit over 10 years of service time spread over 12+ seasons.
The word of the day: economy.
And that’s what makes Philadelphia that much more dangerous in 2011: by pushing Hamels back to #4 in the rotation, Charlie Manuel will be required to make fewer calls to his bullpen, both for middle relief and for his late-inning specialists. Economized usage. The only remaining question is what to do about the 5-spot, as Blanton is probably too expensive to keep and Kendrick too unreliable to throw out there 26+ times.
This front four is clearly the best in MLB, but if all reverts back to normal and with slight improvement from one pitcher the Red Sox could have a staff pretty close to this one—
Lester-could easily be in discussion for top 5 pitcher in MLB
Beckett- if he pitches the way he did from 07-09, and is healthy (he has a lower xFIP than Lee did from 08-10)
Buccholz-this is whom I talk about for improvement, as I want to see him improve his k/9 to 7.5+/9, which he easily could given his stuff and repetiore
Lackey- if he reverts back to LAA form (remember Beckett had the same type of year when he first came to Boston), and yes, Lackey needs to improve against lefties
But, is all goes right, a rotation of Lester/Beckett/Buchholz/Lackey is not that far behind Halladay/Lee/Hamels/Oswalt
Actully, they probably won’t pitch any games together while they’re on the same team…
Comment by Disco Burritos — December 14, 2010 @ 1:49 am
I get that the total’s less, but crasnick just tweeted the deal’s actually 5/120 with a vesting option 6th yr. Good on him? Sure, he’s the highest paid pitcher in baseball now, not a saint though.
Comment by Oddibe McBlauser — December 14, 2010 @ 1:51 am
Amaro is a top 5 Worst Gm in MLB….great move here, but all else points to him being an imbecile. The Lee trade last yr was an awful panicky move, the Ibanez deal was bad, the Blanton deal was bad, and just his overall knowledge of how to evaluate ML players is pretty bad. He has absolutely ZERO knowledge of statistical analysis, as he still looks at RBI totals to make evaluations, still looks at Wins and ERA for pitchers for evaluations, and actually stated this offseason with a level of sincerity that Ibanez was just as productive as Werth, based on RBI totals. This is NOT a smart GM by any means of the imagination. If you have the resources the Phils do, with the great scouting department they have, its not hard to make a trade for Halladay, or sign someone like Lee, and give away a sub-par package for Oswalt (as Happ is a #4 starter in the long-run and thats bieng generous, Villar has upside but a long way to go with the bat, and Gose could turn out to be a valuable player, but he still also has a ways to go). Amaro is NOT a good GM AT ALL.
So do Ricky Nolasco’s (in fact he has better ratios and xFIP)
How many playoff teams/contenders would have had Cole Hammels as a # 1 starter last year? The Reds?
Cole Hammels has exceeded 4 WAR exactly once in his career – excellent pitcher, but let’s not be a slave to predictive #’s. There are a lot of pitchers in the 10-12 WAR range over the last three years, and i have a hard time believing that stat (or FIP) is fine enough to really distinguish that small a difference over a cumulative 3 year period)
except every pitcher except for Lester there is a question mark to perform at an elite level…none of the Philly pitchers, save for Oswalt maybe, has any question marks at all. Except for health, but every staff has to have that question, and the top-4 on the Phils are actually quite durable.
The Red Sox absolute best-case scenario is about even with the expected Phillies scenario.
Philly is going to be scary.
Comment by theonemephisto — December 14, 2010 @ 2:07 am
I agree with you to an extent. Assuming the Phils keep this rotation intact, they will have the best rotation in baseball regardless of who their fifth starter is. The only other rotation that I think is at all comparable to this one is that of the Red Sox for the reasons you stated above, but they are still inferior to the Phillies’ by a good margin. The only advantage the Red Sox have is:
1) Age, the oldest is Lackey and he is younger than Halladay and Oswalt and the same age as Lee, and
2) Daisuke is probably better than whoever their fifth starter will be.
I’ll never understand this ridiculous criticism of Maddux. If he was somehow good enough or smart enough to get a huge strikezone (which I think is largely a myth at this point) that is just part of what made him so good.
I never said they will be….I said if all goes well, they easily could be close to their level.
No one thought Lackey would pitch as poorly as he did (and Beckett had the same struggles), and I fully expect him to be better than he was last year.
If Beckett is healthy, and all indications point to him being fully healthy, there is no reason to believe he cant pitch the way he did in 07-09 and a be a 5+ win pitcher
If you have ever watched Buchholz pitch, you can clearly see that he has the ability to strike 7.5+/9 out. He was a monster at the end of the season and pitched brilliantly. He could easily improve next year.
If all goes well, and Lackey and Beckett pitch like they did the previous 3 years, plus a slight improvement from Clay, they could easily go toe-to-toe with the Phils.
Lackey is still in his early 30’s, Beckett is only 20, and Lester and Clay are in there mid 20’s. There is no reason to think they cant perform to the level we all expect.
I fully expect Beckett to pitch like he did from 07-09 since he is healthy, and I expect a increased performance from Buchholz.
The only pitcher I am skeptical about is Lackey, but last year could prove to be an outlier, just as Beckett 06 season was. Lackey is a competitor and I know he was very disappointed in how he pitched last year, so I am expecting a better year next year, but Im just not sure it will be that of the #1 pitcher we saw in LA, but he very well could be.
i think it’s dumb to think the players association will be mad about this – i mean, they DO know that he was OFFERED more money, so its not like agents wouldnt point to the higher offers and the fact that lee chose the best situation for himself…otherwise your agent sucks. he COULD have earned more than 120M easily, had he wanted to.
Will the Phillies be good? Yep. Darn good. But this isn’t the powerhouse it would have been two years ago, nor the powerhouse some people are automatically making it out to be. That lineup is getting old and regressing a ton, and that’s when they aren’t injured.
Comment by www.Paapfly.com — December 14, 2010 @ 2:22 am
I dont need to convince myself or anyone, its a fact that they are awesome. They scored the second most runs last yr, with Peddy out for half the season, Youk out a 1/3 of the season, Cameron out 2/3 of the season, Ellsbury out the whole season, and on the pitching side, Beckett was not healthy all year, and Lackey pitched the worst season of his career. Ohhh, and they still won 89 in the AL East. No other team in MLB could have sustained those injuries and won 89 in the AL East.
Now they have added AGon and Crawford, will get a healthy Beckett, and hopefully a substantial improvement from Lackey, and a slight improvement from Buchholz. They could easily win 100 games this year.
So no, I dont need to convince myself or anyone that the Sox are still the team to beat in MLB.
And Ill take the Red Sox offense over the aging and deterioating Phils O any day of the week.
Comment by Barry Jive — December 14, 2010 @ 2:27 am
One that I want to point out that no one has mentioned. Will Lee be as dominant pitching in a park that is as hitter-friendly as is in Philly.
Why do I say this?
This is why:
Lee is a Flyball pitcher, as he hovers around 40-45% GB rate, and has had around a 6-7% FB/Hr rate over the past few seasons. He also pitches around 88-91 Fastball, and doesnt have an “out” pitch. Will he be able to sustain such a low HR/FB rate in an environment like Philly with such a low GB rate? He is a plus-plus command guy, but that is still a silly low HR rate with such a low GB rate. He very well could, but I wouldnt bet on it, and more HR means a higher ERA and more runs given up. He will still be a great pitcher for most of this contract, but dont be surprised to see that Hr rate increase in an environment in Philly.
Um, maybe it’s because I’m celebrating this by drinking lots of beers but I accidentally clicked the downvote instead of replying.
Anyway, the revisionist theory is that Ruben Amaro knew Lee would be an attainable FA in just a year, and that Halladay was an attainable commodity last December. When Lee’s agent rubbed him the wrong way, he took the sure thing for four years instead of Lee for just one followed by a risky negotiating process.
I have no idea if that’s true. But no one can prove it false, so as a Phils homer I’m going with that.
Comment by Barry Jive — December 14, 2010 @ 2:31 am
Philly’s next move is to add a second pitcher’s mound. HOW WILL BATTERS HANDLE HAVING TO HIT TWO BALLS AT ONCE??!
Lee will also be facing inferior hitters compared to what he faced in 2010, and pitched great in Phillie for a few months in 2009. He still seems like a slam dunk to be an elite pitcher for at least the next couple seasons. I also disagree that he doesn’t have an “out” pitch, which is completely false.
Comment by www.Paapfly.com — December 14, 2010 @ 2:35 am
It’s definitely bias, but I’d take Timmy, Cainer, Sanchee, and MadBum over anybody the Phils can march out there.
I’d also prefer the twenty or thirty million dollar savings in those four next year. Disregarding the dollar:WAR comparison, I’ll wager that the G’s top four will produce comparably to the Phillies’ top four during any number of the next five years.
If only we could unload and replace Z….
….because, Dave Cameron, a rotation is five pitchers, not four.
Comment by merizobeach — December 14, 2010 @ 2:37 am
Agreed, locking down Jayson Werth for $10 million for the 2009 and 2010 seasons was clearly the work of an incompetent jackass
Comment by Barry Jive — December 14, 2010 @ 2:38 am
I think the Phillies rotation will be very good but they only have a short window of time as most of their starting pitchers are on the wrong side of thirty
Hamels 26 (the only young one)
On the other hand The oldest Giant starter is only 27 and they all pretty much destroyed the Phillies and Cliff Lee and they aren’t even in their prime yet! I would think that would be more scary.
JGH, whenever you have to start every sentence with “if all goes well,” you’re in dangerous territory. Beckett has had injury difficulties many times in his career. Lackey is getting older and had a very poor season in 2010. Both if these guys have serious question marks for 2011. They may pitch well, but the smart money would bet neither if them would be all star caliber. Daisuke is a below average pitcher. Until Bucholz demonstrates strike out ability at the ML level he doesn’t have it.
The Sox have Lester and a bunch of talented pitchers with big question marks right now. They don’t hold a candle to the phillies rotation.
This sounds really fun on paper, but I’ll take the homegrown, young Giants rotation over this group of old guys. Maybe not just for 2011, but to produce for the next few years, the Phillies can’t hope to match San Francisco.
We never could’ve acquired Randy Johnson et al without them.
Jeff Moorad threw $95M at Eric Byrnes, Russ Ortiz and Shawn Green. In my view, that relative failure to augment a pretty good farm* bequeathed by Colangelo/Rizzo is responsible for much of the recent failure.
Even Upton landed in their lap as a consensus #1 following Colangelo’s 2004 flame out.
Comment by Diamondhacks — December 14, 2010 @ 3:00 am
Who cares… does he get better with only 1 “m”? Look the guy is a damn good pitcher,but this #1 pitcher on most playoff contenders is hyperbole. His advanced stats look a lot like Nolasco…. his three year WAR #’s (the premise of this article) put him in Buerhle/Danks range. Is he better than those guys? Sure. #1 pitcher on a contender?
Beckett was healthy from 07-09, as his lowest start total was 27 games during that time period. He was not healthy all last year, but all signs point to him being healthy this year. If he is healthy, he is a sure fire #1 starter. As previously stated, he has a lower xFIP than Lee does from 07-09 than Lee does from 08-10. Just a little fact. Not saying he is better, when both healthy and effective, Beckett is just as good a pitcher as Lee. Beckett has above average command, usually giving up 1.75-2 bb/9 while k’ing 8.5-9/9.
In regards to Buchholz, it seems to me that you have never seen him pitch. Sure, his k/9 for the year wasnt great, but the last few months of the season, he was dominating hitters. He absolutely has the ability to k 7.5-8+/9. He has great stuff, and a plus cutter that is a out pitch against LHH. He absolutely has the ability to k hitters, and he had a pretty danm good first full year in the bigs last year. Not many people will be as successful as he was in their first ML season buddy. All throughout the minors he k’d 9-10/9, and will only improve as he pitches in more big league games. Even if he only ks 7/9, with his GB rate at 50+%, he still is a good #3 guy, so that is a far-fetched statement, and simply ignorant to say, unless his starts k’ing people, he simply doesnt have it. That is simply wrong. This was his first year in the bigs, and was pretty damn successful, and as I previously stated, it appears you have not watched him that much bc he does have the arsenal to have a good k%.
All the speculation is simply Yankees lovers crying over spilt milk.
The Yankees don’t get guys by offering market value, they get guys by blowing everyone else out of the water. If the Yankees wanted Lee they should have offered 7/175 million. I knew that is what it would take to get him in pinstripes I don’t know why they didn’t.
Thankyou Amaro and Lee for netting the Mariners Justin Smoak. In 2015 when Smoak is the best first baseman in baseball in the midst of his prime it will be us Seattle fans that are laughing all the way to the bank.
I never said he wasnt going to be great in the next few seasons. I agree that he most likely will. I was only drawing attention to the fact that someone with his arsenal, with his flyball tendencies, in that hitters environment, that his most unsustainable 6-7% HR/FB rate, will most likely increase over the next few years, if not next year, which will result in more runs given up. That is all I was trying to bring to everyone’s attention. He will be a stud, and a top 15 pitcher in MLB over the next few seasons, but that HR/FB rate should increase bc of the factors I named above.
He doesnt have an “out” pitch. You say it is false, but fail to mention this so-called “out” pitch. He has plus-plus command of all of his pitches, which is why he is so good. His FB was his best pitch last yr, but you can hardly call that an “out” pitch when he throws it 88-91 dude. He has great control of his CH and Curve, but those are hardly out pitches. His command is why he is so dominate. He doesnt have a true “out” pitch. That is just the truth buddy. Sorry to dissapoint. Please, show me data that shows he has an out pitch. Even looking at his pitch type values proves my point.
Lincy is better than Lester, but not by a huge amount, and both are #1’s
Id rather have a healthy Beckett than Cain- repeat a HEALTHY Beckett
Id rather have a healthy,effective, and pre-2010 Lackey than Sanchez
And Id rather have Buchholz plus 97 MPH FB, plus-cutter and plus-CH than MadBums’ ineffective 90 MPH FB, and his plus CU, SL, and CH.
If Lackey pitches like he did last yr, than Id rather have Sanchez, but Id still rather have a healthy Sox rotation any day of the week.
The AAV the Phillies paid is higher than the Yankees or Rangers, plus the vesting offer is easier to get to than the Ranger one was. The Yankees offered the most guaranteed money and the Rangers the most overall potential value. Basically, they were all essentially equal offers but differ in how they get there.
Like Jered Weaver and Clayton Kershaw, Lee puts up a >10% average IFFB rate. Most recent research shows that inducing pop ups is actually a skill for a fair number of guys, especially pitchers who throw moving fastballs up in the zone. That doesn’t make a guy a “flyball pitcher”.
Add to that the fact that Lee’s sublime control combined and climbing K numbers mean no one is on base anyway and you really don’t have to worry if his HR rate climbs anyway. Pedro Martinez gave up plenty of solo shots.
(I’ll give the Carlos Pena/Carlos Lee mistake a pass, I think we can all figure that out)
When I look at the Yankees I keep thinking about player age but I don’t believe we are at a point where they start paying the price…which is most likely a price they will be able to afford. I see that Yankees (current roster) as a mid 90 win team which is also where I put the Red Sox. The Rays are a few wins back from that. This is also on Dec 14th so a lot of roster movement can/will happen.
All that said: I would really like to see the Yankees finish is fourth but I’d wager the national debt against it.
It’s funny how different I feel about this signing than I would have if it were a Yankee signing.
With the Phils signing the “Wow” “OMG” “think of the rotation” exclamations all pop to mind but if it were the Yankees I would definitely respect the rotation and team as a whole but would not be as stunned. I’m not sure if that is because I expect the bottomless wallet that is the Yankees to bring in every targeted free agent or if it is because even the Lee led Yankees would have potential equals in the Sox and Rays.
I cannot think of another team where the news of this singing would have shocked/impressed me more. Maybe the Giants. OK…with more thought it would have to be the Giants as they are the only team I can imagine where this news would make me say “World Series Team” like this did for the Phils. The AL East teams all have to compete with each other and there’s not another team out there where Lee puts them “over the top”.
oh c’mon man, it can be rationalized that ALL of his pitches are legit out pitches, because of the confidence he has with each one in any count. It’s like saying Roy Halladay doesn’t have an out pitch…how does he get all of his outs then? wizardry?? No, he gets them with his cutter, curveball, 2-seam/sinker and now his changeup…judging by the effectiveness, I’d say they are all out pitches
if you’re thinking of a “Strikeout” pitch to put batters away with…look at his k/9 and tell me he doesn’t have one of those either
How excited is Philly right now? I got 3 phonecalls at 12:15 AM last night from other fans…all of whom know I wake up at 5 AM for work. It didnt matter, it was that crazy. The entire city is nuts right now.
Comment by neuter_your_dogma — December 14, 2010 @ 8:55 am
Marlins are not pissed, they don’t care.
Comment by neuter_your_dogma — December 14, 2010 @ 8:57 am
This deal does not suprise me in the least bit! Cliff Lee practically begged Amaro to let him stay. I think Amaro had regrets about letting Lee go. When rumors leaked out at the winter meetings that there was a MYSTERY TEAM talking to Lee, in my heart I knew it was the Phillies. I was not worried at all that Lee might sign with NY. No one has mentioned the fact that Mrs. Cliff Lee was VERY unhappy and displeased with the lack of a warm welcome she received in NY. Mrs. Lee was the deciding factor in this deal because behind every great man is an outstanding woman. When the Mrs. is happy, the Hubby is happy. They don’t call Philadelphia the “City of Brotherly Love” for nothing.
Nothing wrong with a one night stand, especially if the rotation is really really hot.
Was on the Phillies’ D-Plan last year and sat through a couple of Kendrick/Blanton/Moyer starts (although I enjoyed Jamie). Nice to know that I have an 80% chance of seeing one of these 4 pitch, barring injury or another move.
Also, I believe Phillies have one of the best farm systems A ball and below. Hopefully these cost controlled players will be ready once the older players are phased out.
Comment by neuter_your_dogma — December 14, 2010 @ 9:05 am
I’m not sure destroyed is a fair word to use in your description. If memory serves me, the Phils outscored the Giants in the series 20 to 19. So both teams player pretty evenly. I think the Giants Braves series was also very even.
Will anyone be as excited as me when the Giants fail to make the playoffs this year and all the homers on this board vanish again? Every single big news story on this site has been overrun by fair weather Giants fans this winter. It’s gross.
Every World Series winner has it’s bandwagon fans, but most of the Giants fans who post here have been around a long time and have endured a lot of losing to get to this point. Yeah, they might have a let-down year and not make the playoffs but the Phillies have to play 162 games too. A NLCS rematch would be one for the ages, don’t you think?
While I will excuse your baseball stupidity and cast a few throwbacks that would be superior. Dodgers staff of Koufax, Drysdale, Podres Osteen, Sutton. Indians staff of Lemon, Wynn, Garcia, Score, Feller. We could outline more but it is pointless. The Phillies have a extremely talented staff. But greatest! Far from it. Beyond that, how about seeing what they achieve as a unit before you rate them among Baseball’s greatest.
You’re not alone. He’s got some serious mileage under the hood and you’d think he will lose stuff and spend some time on the DL.
And if Hamels looks more like the Hamels of 2009, then you are really just looking at a superb 1-2 punch.
Same scenario for all the elite staffs though…
Comment by Scout Finch — December 14, 2010 @ 9:49 am
I think the downside in all this for the Phils is the offense; I imagine Ruben is just going stand pat, aside from bringing up Dominic Brown? Offense has definitely shown signs of aging last couple of years. Lots of injuries, fall off in production even when healthy. Maybe if they can stay healthy and get a good bench, they will be set up for a last hurrah or two.
I love how Giants fans are talking about how they beat them all in th playoffs. THe Giants basically hit the lottery with their journeymen lineup last year all playing well over their heads. The chances of them beating these four pitchers again is worse than the chance of Cody Ross waking up tomorrow and not looking like an elf anymore.
Some seriously good dynamic duos. If they all make the playoffs, we’re in for some really good pitching matchups (moreso than usual).
I looked up Baltimore’s rotation WAR from 1971 … basically Halladay and Lee can equal that on their own (even with using rWAR, based on runs allowed where Lee’s WAR drops 3 points).
The Phils bullpen has to be elated. Lee and Halladay are efficient workhorses (along with being excellent pitchers). The bullpen is going to be well rested, and likely effective and healthy all year. Obviously you cannot predict injuries, etc but pitching less often (both in terms of volume and frequency) is desirable for most relievers.
Comment by CircleChange11 — December 14, 2010 @ 10:22 am
“its a fact that they are awesome.”
Well at least we got that cleared up. Any other questions? Anybody?
The Giants are basically a team that is set up ideally for the playoffs IMHO. The pitching is outstanding and the offense is generally good enough to score more runs than their opponents.
Yes, in the playoffs the offense went crazy and they had some big blowouts. But, seriously Lincecum, Cain, Sanchez, with Baumy as a 4th? You have to beat either Lincecum or Cain twice. Good luck.
We have to stop looking at playoffs as if it were the same as the regular season. We do not do this in any other sport. In the playoffs, rotations are trimmed to 3 starters (generally), the best relievers can and sometimes are used in the most important spots. Whoever wins 4 games first, moves on.
We need to look at matchups as well. So much of the playoff analysis examined WAR over the season, which 2/3’s of the games are against non-playoff teams, and 1.5 of those games against 4A teams. Yes, we do this for SSS reasons, but that doesn’t make the data all that relevant.
The Giants are well-suited for the playoffs, because they are pitching heavy with an average offense. IMO, that’ll be successful more times than one would think.
Comment by CircleChange11 — December 14, 2010 @ 10:30 am
The 63 Dodgers had a starting rotation WAR of 20.6, 10.8 of which is Lefty’s.
Comment by CircleChange11 — December 14, 2010 @ 10:35 am
Not to be a wet blanket, but I would hardly point to the Jays as a team that stands to improve in 2011 due “bad luck” in 2010.
The season from Bautista was legendary, Vernon Wells had his second best season by WAR, John Buck had a career year, plus they had the better half of Alex Gonzalez’s career year. Adam Lind was awful, but he’s not really a player with an established baseline, so who knows what will happen with him going forward.
This offseason they’ve subtracted some of the best from their rotation (Marcum) and their bullpen (Downs, likely Gregg). I don’t see how much better should be expected in 2011.
H2O got torn up in inter league play this year. They played the ALDS teams, but still. They played lots of games and did poorly in all of them.
The post season is just a difficult time to predict… now I’d be an idiot not to say they are VERY likely to make it to the post season.
I also always wondered if Lee’s pitching style is a little like Mets pitcher Frank Viola. Top notch fineness pitcher with a low 90s fastball and great movement on other pitches… when his stuff is working. Otherwise, looks like a number 4 or 5 pitcher.
Comment by Barkey Walker — December 14, 2010 @ 10:39 am
I remember when the Commissioner cancelled the trade with Oakland and Cincinnati for Vida Blue. He said it would not be good for the balance of power in baseball.
I’d rather have the Giants under 30 staff, than the Phillies over 30 staff. The Giants have 4 potential number 1’s and a former Cy Young winner (hey, you stop laughing at Barry Zito and his unicorn). Seriously though, that staff would have helped the Phillies finish in exactly the same spot they did last year, except they lost Jayson Werth. I guess when you look at counting stats over the last three years it skews the comparison a bunch because the Giants pitchers are young, while the Phillies aren’t, but Madison Bumgarner actually outpitched Lee in the WS, even though they didn’t go head to head, and I would bet a lot of money that he’s more likely to get better, while Lee is likely begin to regress….right….about….now.
Comment by Giant Torture — December 14, 2010 @ 11:02 am
cole hamels by bWAR:
1 is pretty much the same as 4, right?
Comment by fredsbank — December 14, 2010 @ 11:03 am
So Amaro has no ability to evaluate major league players, but accurately looked past ERA to determine that Happ may be overvalued and got Oswalt (along with a good deal of money) for Happ and prospects? And at a time when Amaro was in negotiations, which would have led him to want to portray Werth’s value as lower and Ibanez’s as higher, he’s stupid because you take at face value his attempts to negotiate through the media by citing Ibanez and Werth’s RBI totals? And Joe Blanton has been worth 9, 9, and 7.5 mm the past three years. But Amaro’s stupid for signing him to a three year 24 million dollar deal last offseason? I agree Amaro’s made some poor decisions (the middle of the three Cliff Lee decisions, Howard’s contract extension), but to kill him on some of these is just silly.
Comment by fredsbank — December 14, 2010 @ 11:06 am
no, pitchers have ZERO control over their batted ball types, dont you pay attention?
Comment by fredsbank — December 14, 2010 @ 11:08 am
Depends a lot on how MadBum trends this season. His velocity kept trending up throughout 2010. He was clearly throwing harder in Sep/Oct than earlier.
Actually there are several late season trends that we need to see how they play out. If Lincecum’s improved training regimen and new slider continue, his CY odds take a massive jump.
And with Sanchez it’s still the exact same story, on days when he keeps his arm in the right slot, he’s the most unhittable pitcher in baseball. From 2009 to 2010 those days came more often. If that continues, he’ll be better in 2011.
You’ve got much much better odds on those trends continuing as opposed to hoping for improved pitcher health for the Sox.
That spike in 2009 would explain the off year according to bWAR. I don’t really see anything in his batted ball profile to suggest that that variation was his fault (LD rate was higher in 2008, best IFFB% of career in 2009).
Comment by suicide squeeze — December 14, 2010 @ 11:11 am
Except, they would’ve had an even tougher time scoring runs without Jayson Werth, but hey they’ve still got the two most overrated position players in baseball (no one can challenge Jeter), so they’ve got that going for them. Also, Domonic Brown is not the real deal, he’s the super toolsy outfielder who everyone projects to be great, but never is. The Phillies rotation is good, but get ready for lots of 2-1 and 1-0 games next year against league average staffs.
Comment by Giant Torture — December 14, 2010 @ 11:11 am
Ryan Madson is also very lonely in the bullpen, he’s the only big-leaguer down there other than LOLidge.
Comment by Giant Torture — December 14, 2010 @ 11:13 am
“If there’s a four-man rotation that has ever looked this dominant heading into a new year, I can’t find it. It is almost certainly in the discussion for the greatest four-man rotation of all time. ”
Oh, really?? Well, as long as you’re not looking before 1980, when Fangraphs… OOPS! …doesn’t have WAR, the great savior of baseball analysis. What the heck, we don’t need to even consider that ancient history. I mean, 1993 is waaaaay back in the past!
So, let’s stick to arcane statistical analysis and anoint these guys the greatest ever BEFORE THEY’VE EVER THROWN A PITCH AS A GROUP!
Now, I agree sabermetrics brings some very interesting and even useful tools to the baseball discussion. But you guys have a very short memory. Besides the rotations mentioned in other comments, you forgot the 1969-71 Orioles group of Palmer, McNally, Cuellar and Phoebus/Dobson. Sure, win-loss record is an imperfect measure, but nine 20-win seasons in three years? I’d say that’s pretty damn good, at least until you guys get around to calculating xFIP and WAR for all those old guys.
Until then, let this old guy remind you that there were some pretty good ball players in the game before 1980.
Comparing Matt Cain in the same breath as Lee or Halladay is a slap in their face.
Comparing top pitchers to each other is fine. Nothing in the “slap in the face” category.
Comment by CircleChange11 — December 14, 2010 @ 11:14 am
Both of those teams had great rotations, but I don’t think the comparison you suggest is valid. You have to look at a particular year and see whether those names represent pitchers still pitching at a very high level for some 3 year period that includes that season.
In the Indians case, if you choose 1954, Feller was essentially through as a great pitcher and Score was not yet there. If you select 1956, Garcia was clearly in decline with Lemon not far behind and Feller of course irrelevant.
With the Dodgers, if you select 1966, it is Koufax’s last year and Sutton’s first so there is no history on which to draw for him, while Podres is a non-factor and has been for 3 years. If you prefer 1964, neither Sutton nor Osteen are there and Podres is already in serous decline.
I don’t know if the 2011 Phillies rotation will be the best ever, or even the best in 2011, but all 4 pitchers were outstanding in 2010, all four have a history of excellence and none seem to be on their last legs.
Halladay and Lee will likely earn that much themselves.
I don’t doubt that the great pitchers of previous eras are equal, if not superior, to modern pitchers. But, IMO, the replacement level now is so much lower due to 5-man rotations, increased relievers, and expansion teams … that the WAR is “inflated” compared to other eras.
I asked the same thing about the 60s and batter WAR.
I also looked up the 63 Dodgers. 20.6 WAR
The ’11 Phillies will likely match that and pass it a little.
I don’t think that inherently means that the rotations were “better”, but that compared to the replacement levels of their time, they were more valuable.
Take the Phillies starting 4 back 30 years and have them make 40 starts, throw almost 300 IP each, and then we’ll see. The same could be said of bringing them to the modern era where there are more than 3 decent hitters in each lineup.
I admit, I seem to be one of the few people that is really interested in figuring out if Griffey Jr’s decade was better than Willie Mays’s decades. They’re both awesome. I’m good with that.
Comment by CircleChange11 — December 14, 2010 @ 11:22 am
Your point is well taken, that this is pre mean reversion WAR (if you take the top WARS, they will likely get lower next year). It’s the kine of mistake FG should not make.
Comment by Barkey Walker — December 14, 2010 @ 11:49 am
Don’t get too cocky, some team will be thanking SEA for developing Smoak into a 5-6 WAR player that they’ll acquire in the last year of his contract to help them reach the WS … and you’ll be starting it all over again with a “prospect” from that trade.
You do realize that all the teams involved in the Lee trades made the playoffs last year and will be strong candidates again this year, right? …. except the mariners that is.
Am I really to believe that the M’s are the big winners in all of this?
Comment by CircleChange11 — December 14, 2010 @ 11:54 am
Beckett hasn’t K’d 9/9 since 2003, and he’s only walked less than 2.3/9 twice in his career. Neither Bill James nor fan projections are nearly as optimistic about his performance and health as you.
Bucholz was incredibly lucky last year. His BABIP was .265, LOB% was 79%, and HR/FB was 5.6%. All those numbers are in for big regression. As for dominating at the end of the season, April was his best month (2.92 FIP), and September was his second worst (4.38 FIP). He also walked 4/9 in September.
Amaro good moves: Trading for and extending Halladay, Trading for Lee in 2009, Trading for Oswalt, Signing Werth for 2009-2010, Signing Victorino to 3 year deal before 2010, signing Ruiz to 3 year deal before 2010 and signing Cliff Lee in 2010 (though that may play out to be a bad deal 5 years form now, everyone agrees it was below market rate and he’s the best free agent available). Minor league pickup of Wilson Valdez before the 2010 was a small move, but a huge win for the team in 2010.
Amaro push moves: Polanco signing (good pick up too many years), Blanton signing (market rate for middle of the road pitcher).
Amaro bad moves: Trading Lee (epic fail), Howard extension (why???), signing Ibanez, Signing Danys Baez (why!), not utilizing minor league arms in bullpen.
I would argue that signing Ibanez wasn’t even a bad move. The insane value he put up in 2009 and a slightly below average 2010 have almost made him worth his 3 year deal in only two years. People criticize the signing because it was a bad idea, too many years and too much money for an old outfielder without much defensive value, and then fail to look at the actual value that Ibanez put up for the team. Its like the sabermetrics version of racism. Contractism.
Anyway, Amaro’s two biggest mistakes were very big, but he’s done a lot of good. I’m not sure he’s a good GM because I can’t tell if he’s lucky or smart, but he has improved the Phillies a great deal.
Signs, maybe…but we’re still talking about a team that has either finished 1st or 2nd in their league for Runs Scored in each of the past four seasons.
It’s not like we’re talking about the Pirates offense here.
Comment by Jessamynn — December 14, 2010 @ 12:05 pm
That cross-slice of Maddux is probably the best three years of his prime, and he was one of the five or so best pitchers ever. The strike is the only reason he was below 24 WAR over that three year span. You can’t find three years of Roy Halladay that add up to 24, much less three straight. And since WAR is based on specific run environments, you can’t claim it’s because of the different era.
Don’t get me wrong, Roy Halladay is a great pitcher, but he comes up very short in a comparison with the best of Maddux’s prime years.
Fair Weather fans? The Giants have consistently been one of the top teams in the MLB in attendance since they opened Mays Field. Not to mention, all of the so-called “fans” on the East Coast, especially the northeast, seem to forget that most of the American born professional baseball players come from the West and the South. Your average Giants fan is much more knowledgeable than your average New York, Boston or Philly fan because they’ve most likely played a lot more baseball and because sane people would never support the Axis of Evil that is the Red Sox, Yankees and now Phillies.
Comment by Giant Torture — December 14, 2010 @ 12:34 pm
There you go, look at one stat and use it as your entire argument, brilliant. So I guess that if we just look at opponents’ BAA, then Jonathan Sanchez was the best pitcher in baseball last year, because his was the best. That’s retarded, but hey coming from a Red Sox fan, it’s par for the course. Matt Cain is one of the pitcher’s most often used as an argument against xFIP as a meaningful statistic and while Lincecum posted an xFIP below 4 in the past, so did the rookie Bumgarner. Expert analysis from the lil Evil Empire.
Comment by Giant Torture — December 14, 2010 @ 12:40 pm
Palmer, McNally, Cuellar, and Dobson?
Definitely on a yearly basis it does not compare, but it was one of the best ever in 1971. Don’t know the WAR stats of those guys from that year, but I have a feeling the numbers were astronomical.
Wins are a deservingly berated stat, but since its the only fact about that rotation I can remember about the rotation that made it so good, they had 4 20-game winners in one season
I’m glad sfar505 mentioned the team because the 1955 Cleveland Indians probably need to be included in any comparison. This is what that club was working with for a starting 5 rotation (using FIP since we don’t have xFIP stats posted for the 50s)
(stats from 1952-1954, leading up to 1955)
2.91 FIP over 822 IP – Mike Garcia
3.47 FIP over 854 IP – Bob Lemon
3.58 FIP over 808 IP – Early Wynn
3.68 FIP over 586 IP – Art Houtman
3.88 FIP over 507 IP – Bob Feller
With rookie Herb Score ready for a spot as well
And what the 1955 Indians actually saw
3.12 FIP over 210 IP – Mike Garcia
3.29 FIP over 227 IP – Herb Score
3.46 FIP over 230 IP – Early Wynn
3.59 FIP over 211 IP – Bob Lemon
4.02 FIP over 83 IP – Bob Feller
4.19 FIP over 124 IP – Art Houtteman
Where this is the current Phillies (2008-2010 stats)
2.85 FIP over 667 IP – Cliff Lee
3.03 FIP over 735 IP – Roy Holladay
3.60 FIP over 601 IP – Roy Oswalt
3.70 FIP over 629 IP – Cole Hamels
4.44 FIP over 568 IP – Joe Blanton (until he is removed)
5.07 FIP over 362 IP – Kyle Kendrick
It will probably be difficult for Halladay, Lee, Oswalt and Hamels to surpass what Garcia, Score, Wynn and Lemon actually produced for the 1955 Tribe, and Kendrick (or outside chance, Blanton) should be hard pressed to top the Feller/Houtteman combo.
But overall, the two rotations match up pretty dang well and (with those 90s Braves clubs) have definitely jumped into the Top Rotation Ever Assembled argument.
I’m a Phillies fan but I’m surprised that nobody has mentioned the 1971 Orioles staff with their four 20-game winners: Mike Cuellar, 20-9; Pat Dobson, 20-8; Jim Palmer, 20-9 and Dave McNally, 21-5. Let’s just wait and see what happens before making boasts. Injuries happen and the Giants will be hard pressed to catch lightning in a bottle two years in a row.
If Buchholz had the ability to k 8 per 9, he would have done so. He has the velocity and thus the potential to get there some day. But he does not have the ability until he demonstrates it. He has the POTENTIAL.
Comment by dutchbrowncoat — December 14, 2010 @ 4:02 pm
oooh. dave cameron should probably make a passive agressive tweet about how there is no honor on the internet.
Comment by dutchbrowncoat — December 14, 2010 @ 4:10 pm
Are the Phillies even better than they were two months ago? I agree that Lee is an improvement, but this team is built for the playoffs. I have to think Lee’s value over Blanton is less than the value of Werth. After you account for aging, I don’t think the Phillies “improved.” I think they are just trying to keep pace with themselves.
So we’re clear Ryan Dempster, higher WAR than Ham(m)els over the last 3 years, is an even more legitimate #1 FOR PLAYOFF CONTENDERS, which is what Dave C characterized him as.
He had the 17th highest WAR total (not 16th), if folks are going to confuse that with him being the 17th best pitcher, than meet the 15 best pitcher and legitimate #1 starter on playoff contenders… Ryan Dempster!
And I refer to fangraph WAR totals because:
a) That is what this article was based on
b) We are on Fangraph’s site
(I know…. crazy me… if you want to look at BR’s WAR, you may need to re-work your earlier CC Sabathia comparison and how high Hamels is on the WAR list)
Yeah, he was so nervous a couple of years ago when he was catching infield pops underhand, blowing bubbles, and yawning as he dominated the NYY in Yankee Stadium.
Do broadcasters really think that pro pitchers in the world series look around and say “Well, at least it’s no in Yankee Stadium or I’d be pissing down my leg right now.”
There comes a point where a non-life threatening situation just doesn’t get more nerve-racking.
Comment by CircleChange11 — December 14, 2010 @ 5:15 pm
It’s a great rotation, but there’s only one way it can enter the discussion as the greatest rotation ever. They have to produce as a unit. They’re being compared to rotations that went out and produced numbers collectively. They have a shot, but they can just as easily disappear with slight regressions by Halladay and/or Lee/Oswalt. Avery was every bit the young dynamic pitcher of Hamels, if not more so, but injuries took him out of play after his second 18-win season at age 23.
The Phillies of 2011 have to produce to enter the discussion of best-ever rotations. Right now they’re they equivalent of the number-one, can’t miss AAA prospect. We know something good’s coming, we just don’t know how good.
Wow, Great, he signed Werth. That was a good move, but guess what? He was the NOT the GM that picked him up in the first place. Gillick was. It’s not hard to lock him up for a few seasons when Werth was playing great baseball on both sides of the ball. So that should barely be considered a plus for Amaro when any GM would have done the same thing.
The Ibanez signing was awful, as no one should give a 37yr old poor defensive OF a 3 yr deal.
Why anyone would give Polanco a 3 yr deal is beyond me, even tho he is a decent hitter, but avg. defensive 3B at best
He panicked and traded away Lee (only to resign him a year later), and got an awful package for one of the best starters in the game. This resigning just goes to show how he has NO plan.
So he gets credit for Ed Wade being one of the worst GMs in MLB for taking Happ in the trade for Oswalt? What AWFUL logic. Amaro does NOT at all deserve props for that. Wade deserves to be smacked for taking that package in the first place.
Then he signs Blanton for 3 years and 27M, instead of keeping Lee for 9.5M last year—-so lets get this straight, he trades Lee bc he doesnt think he can resign him, and wants to build back up the farm, then trades him away for a shit package, then resigns Blanton for the exact same salary as Lee, then resigns Lee a year later, so now having to give up his 1st Rd pick in the process? So he wanted to get “prospects and build the farm” after trading a bunch of guys, only to get a bad package of prospects for Lee, while also giving up your 1st rd pick? This shows absolutely no clear sign of a plan AT ALL and shows how panicky he really is.
OHHH and to top it off, he resigns a declining and deterioating Ryan Howard to a 5YR extension for 25M!!!!! a year 2 years before he becomes a FA!!!!??!!??!! This was possibly one of the worst contracts extensions in history and shows again how panicky Amaro can get.
Also, he has shown that he uses stats like RBI’s, and Wins, and ERA, and garbage stats that no one should use anymore to base his decisions. He actually said Ibanez was just as valuable as Werth bc of his RBI totals!!! This man is a JOKE.
You can say he made a good move by locking up Halladay and then resigning Lee (even tho the way he went about his resigning the past yr was awful), but he IS NOT a good GM AT ALL. Easily one of the worst 5 GMs in the game. Hands down.
Lee had one of his best k/9 of his career last yr, but his career k/9 is under 7, and had a 7/9 and a 6.8/9 the two previous years.
All I was saying that he doesnt have an actually “strikeout” pitch. Yes, his control is why his k-rate is good and why he is such a good pitcher, but you can’t tell me he has an actual “out” pitch. He doesnt. His FB was by FAR his best Value PItch, and that is not considered an out pitch as he throws it 88-91. That is all I was saying.
Yes, Lee did get a lot of “outs” last yr, but that doesnt mean he has a prototypical “out” pitch buddy
Show me data and proof that he has a single “strikeout” pitch….
And Halladay throws two pitches that would more widely be considered “out” pitches than what Lee throws. Neither have prototypical out pitches, but Halladay not only has plus-plus command like Lee, but he has better all around stuff than Lee. Lee is not in the same category as Halladay as a pitcher bc Halladays stuff is better
One thing that interests me is how the Giants will deal with the big innings jump that a couple of their starters experienced this year thanks to the WS run. Bumgarner especially pitched a good 70 (72.2 to be exact) more innings than he did in 2009. Considering its his Age 20 season, they’ll really have to watch his usage this upcoming year and avoid high-stress innings/outings. Sanchez also saw a big jump (over 50 more innings) and even Cain and Lincecum pitched a good 20-30 innings more in 2010 and both had career highs in IP.
Granted, IP is a rough estimate of usage (total pitches is more accurate and high stress innings/outings are huge too) but it’ll definitely be interesting to see how a young rotation bounces back.
“There you go, look at one stat and use it as your entire argument, brilliant. So I guess that if we just look at opponents’ BAA, then Jonathan Sanchez was the best pitcher in baseball last year, because his was the best. That’s retarded, but hey coming from a Red Sox fan, it’s par for the course. Matt Cain is one of the pitcher’s most often used as an argument against xFIP as a meaningful statistic and while Lincecum posted an xFIP below 4 in the past, so did the rookie Bumgarner. Expert analysis from the lil Evil Empire.”
1. Yes, that would be retarded because opponents’ BAA is a useless stat. Good analogy.
2. You’re referring to the 10 innings Bumgarner pitched in 2009. Talk about expert analysis.
3. When you have to appeal to the “ur a fan of (team x) ur a dummy face!!1” angel, you know you’ve already lost.
Nowhere did I say that xFIP is infallible, I was merely combating the hyperbolic idea that the Giants rotation is leagues better than Boston’s with some hyperbole of my own.
I don’t have any data on comparable FIPs, Matt, but when BB-Reference neutralizes each pitcher’s statistics to account for eras it has them with the following career ERAs, perhaps not the best stat, but in a neutralized form it may have some value.
The Giants starting rotation has been good for years, it wasn’t a “fluke” in the postseason. They just finally had enough offense to get them through to the playoffs this year. The Giants pitching is made for playoffs.
Here are some cold hard facts for you about the Giants pitching staff
lead the league in ERA with 3.36
allowed the fewest hits in the entire league (1279)
Fifth fewest homeruns given up
Stuck out the most hitters (1331)
Posted a 1.91 ERA in the month of Spetember and held opp. to a .189/.251/.292
ERA of 2.47 in the playoffs, allowed only 94 hits in 134 innings, struck out 133
Matt Cain and his 0.0 ERA in playoffs laughs at your “the Giants have one pitcher who has ever posted an xFIP below 4”. The Redsox have good pitchers but they haven’t lived up to their reps, the difference is the Giants have.
When the Redsox pitch this good get back at me, intill then it’s still
Comment by merizobeach — December 14, 2010 @ 11:52 pm
Like I said, I’ll wager on my team.
Comment by merizobeach — December 15, 2010 @ 12:11 am
Could you even conceive of Selig taking a strong-arm tactic like that against a team? The only strong-arming he’s willing to do is to force another round of playoffs on the fans without dialogue or consideration. He’s still the only commissioner in history to have allowed a WS to be canceled–a clear expression of kowtowing to insider interests and not having the courage to use the ‘absolute powers’ that come with his position.
Comment by merizobeach — December 15, 2010 @ 12:32 am
There are tremendously more people playing baseball around the world today than there were several decades ago; along with better strength and fitness, the overall level of competition has increased.
I’m trying to reconcile that with your observation of the replacement level being lower today than in the past.
Comment by merizobeach — December 15, 2010 @ 12:41 am
Can we please let New England secede from the union to become their own country?
(And definitely Texas with the South, too? And Utah unto itself? And from somewhere between Monterey and San Luis Obispo, extending about a hundred or so miles inland, and continuing up to Blaine, WA, make a Chilean-shaped country? Grant independence to Hawaii, Alaska, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the south tip of Florida? NM, south CO, AZ, NV, and east CA unto themselves? These factions don’t seem to like each other much; wouldn’t they be better off independently? Likewise, shouldn’t Quebec and BC be ceded from Canada?)
Apologies for taking an off-topic tangent.
Comment by merizobeach — December 15, 2010 @ 1:01 am
for what it’s worth, baseballreference.com asks more or less the same question, but tweaks the (teams with 4 sp with 30+ gs and era+ of >130). they credit the ‘braves (maddux, smoltz, glavine, neagle) as being the only other team comparable to the ’11 phillies (based on their ’10 stats). nine other teams came close with 3 sp’s.
Don’t know if the last three years are a fair comparison, because Maddux, Glavine, and Smoltz were 29, 29, and 28 in 1995, while Lee, Halladay, and Oswalt will be 34, 32, and 33. It’s hard to believe their next three will be as good as the Braves next three were.
The problem is that the Baltimore rotation wasn’t really all that good.
3.46 ERA – 1971 AL Average
3.87 FIP – McNally
3.75 FIP – Cuellar
3.19 FIP – Palmer
2.92 FIP – Dobson
You can see that Cuellar and McNaully were actually pitching worse then the league average pitcher. Basically putting them on par with like a modern day Jon Garland type. (An extremely average pitcher who won 18 twice by benefiting from the same things the Baltimore rotation did)
And while yes, the Four are historical because they each won 20 games, there are three real reasons why:
.261/.347/.398/.745, 112 OPS+, 4.70 R/G – Baltimore Offense
.254/.325/.405/.730, 102 OPS+, 4.33 R/G – Second best AL offense from 1971 (Detroit)
.247/.317/.364/.681, 93 OPS+, 3.87 R/G – Average AL club in 1971
Baltimore’s offense was so far and away superior to the other clubs that wins were inevitable for the rotation
142 – that’s the number of starts Palmer, Dobson, Cuellar and McNally made; winning 81 for a win percentage of 57%. Is that really any better then say the 2001 Mariners starting 4 of Freddy Garcia (3.48 FIP), Jamie Moyer (4.17 FIP), Aaron Sele (4.35 FIP) and Paul Abbott (5.01 FIP) – those 4 won 70 of their 127 starts, or 55%
When you make that many starts in front of a superior fielding team while your offense scores an average of just about a run higher then the average club (and even a half run more then the next best)… well, its hard not to win as long as you are posting anything close to average production yourself.
Hello.As a self announced Sports oaf your site is fascinating and expressly what I have been searching for my sporting infatuation. I’m certainly going to bookmark it and encourage all my sports crazy friends about it. However, I cant pinpoint your FB-Fanpage link .. sorry! Can you please post a link in your confirmation. Thanks.
Pretty nice post. I simply stumbled upon your weblog and wanted to say that I’ve truly loved browsing your blog posts. In any case I will be subscribing in your rss feed and I am hoping you write once more soon!