“whom both received three-year guarantees”– it’s actually who. while received seems like a passive voice, it’s actually active, which means that “who” is the subject of the clause, not the object. i know i’m probably coming off as nit-picky, but it just stuck out to me. anyway, good analysis. seems like durbin could have gotten more if he signed earlier with the rest of the crazy reliever crop! even though he is 33, maybe he can get a spot start here or there to increase his value to other teams at the deadline if they think he can be a starter with the 4 pitch repertoire.