FanGraphs Baseball


RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. There’s a certain poetic justice in a guy whose bad luck inspired talk of being moved back to the bullpen now looking like an ace thanks to random chance.

    I’m proud to say I was one of the few who believed.

    Comment by Lewie Pollis — April 29, 2011 @ 11:39 am

  2. “the right-hander’s average on balls in play was roughly 25% more than the league average. This came despite a fantastic groundball rate.”

    Despite? Groundballers *should* have a higher BABIP. Maybe not Masterson’s .324 last year, but it’s not unusual for extreme groundballers to put up a BABIP 10 or 20 points above the .295 norm.

    Comment by Yirmiyahu — April 29, 2011 @ 11:43 am

  3. Having watched the majority if Masterson’s starts over the past 2 years, I’d say his success this year has little to do with random chance. As far as what he can control, he is commanding the ball much better this year, reducing his walks and forcing guys to swing at his pitches. His zone % is 52.7% so far this year, 46.7 last year, I’d also say he’s missing less in the zone, the contact has been weaker this year. Basically he’s been pitching like Masterson pitched in the second half of last year.

    The Indians defense is much improved as well, Hannahan at 3b is a huge difference, it seemed last year Masterson would be counted on to give up at least one weakly hit ball down the 3b line that would result in a single due to the slow footed Peralta, Marte or various second basemen they had playing the position. Whenhe gave up these dinky little hits it would seemingly cause him to become frustrated and overthrow, and he’d walk guys and/or start elevating his pitches. Laporta looks pretty good at 1b as well, and he or Santana is a huge upgrade in range over Branyan, who basically need a ball to be hit right at him and above the knees to make a play .. in Masterson’s first start for example, it was looking like doom until Santana made a diving catch on a bunt that turned into a triple play. Subjectively I’d say Asdrubal Cabrera is playing much better defense than last year, and either way is a huge upgrade over Jason Donald, who played SS when Cabrera was injured and who has neither the range or the arm to play the position adequately.

    Comment by isavage30 — April 29, 2011 @ 11:59 am

  4. the indians lineup can actually hit too – so many promising stories up and down that lineup. Forecast for Masteron: 15-8, 3.68 era, 210 innings, 175K

    Comment by Andy Man Dyke — April 29, 2011 @ 12:07 pm

  5. Thanks for this^. Isn’t his release point different, also?

    I’m sick and tired of all this “Well, we can’t figure out how he’s different just based on this flawed data, so his improvement or worsening must be due to luck!” It seems that half the articles on fangraphs say the same thing. And then commenters who actually watch the game inevitably provide evidence to the contrary.

    Comment by delv — April 29, 2011 @ 12:08 pm

  6. Thanks for the scouting. How’s he looked vs left-handed batters?

    Coming up through the Red Sox system, the biggest concern was always that he had no out pitch vs lefties, and that that might keep him out of the rotation.

    He has extreme and consistent L/R splits for his career (.607 OPS / .814 OPS), and this year looks no different stats-wise. Not only are all his FIP numbers worse, lefties hit the ball a LOT harder vs Masterson: significantly higher LD%, BABIP, IsoP, and a lower GB%.

    I still think that’s an easily-exploitable weakness unless he improves his changeup, or finds some way to get lefties out.

    Comment by Yirmiyahu — April 29, 2011 @ 12:26 pm

  7. It wasn’t so much bad luck as an inability to get lefties out that led to discussion of being moved to the pen. If he can continue holding lefties to a FIP near 4.0 then he’ll be a good starter, but if he reverts to his career average he’ll probably be moved to the bullpen eventually.

    Comment by DavidCEisen — April 29, 2011 @ 12:28 pm

  8. Right-handed hitters had a .335 BABIP against him last year. It wasn’t just his handedness splits that fueled the ERA/DIPS disparity.

    Comment by Lewie Pollis — April 29, 2011 @ 12:53 pm

  9. Great post Isavage30, lets not forget about a “HEALTHY” Grady Sizemore for defensive stability in Centerfield, did you see that diving catch he had the other night? Oh ya, I am a Masterson believer and it’s finally paying off.

    Comment by Dscott — April 29, 2011 @ 1:05 pm

  10. Not evidence.

    The commenters inevitably provided biased, non-expert, results influenced personal opinion.

    That’s not the same thing as evidence. It can be evidence, but it’s often a very, very thin reed.

    Comment by Patrick — April 29, 2011 @ 1:06 pm

  11. I wasn’t really trying to contradict the article, I agree with the basic premise that Masterson pitched better than his results the last 2 years. To say “same” Masterson is a bit of an exaggeration. One clear difference that needs mentioning is the walk rate, in the 2nd half of last year and so far this year he’s been at 3 BB/9, prior to that he was walking above 4 per 9. In the second half last year he had a 3.84 ERA, so even by traditional metrics he was good in the 2nd half. His 3.29 FIP this so far this year is much better than previous years. His fastball speed’s back up too so far, averaging 92.4 where he averaged 91.3 last year … could be result of better endurance, or just not needing as many pitches because of the improved control, his velocity tends to tail off quite a bit still as he goes deeper into games, where he’s consistently hitting 93-95 at the start, and 89-91 later on.

    I think a lot of “luck” with pitchers is bad defense and harder contact. It was interesting to watch Carmona and Masterson last year, similar style pitchers with the same defense, and one has a low BABIP and one has one of the highest in the league. The thing is, I’d say that Carmona was certainly luckier, both with hit placement and for some reason not seeming to have as much bad defensive play on days he pitched. However, Carmona also was pretty clearly consistently inducing weaker contact than Masterson. With Masterson, even when he’s not throwing well and he’s getting up in the zone, guys still tend to hit ground balls and keep the ground ball rate up, but they are HARD ground balls.

    Comment by isavage30 — April 29, 2011 @ 1:34 pm

  12. I’ll go out on a limb and take the under on that one.

    Comment by chuckb — April 29, 2011 @ 2:19 pm

  13. It’s not just his ridiculously low BABIP (for a GB specialist) and ridiculously high strand rate that are indicators of luck. Masterson has also benefited from an unsustainable 4.0% HR/FB ratio. All 3 of those rates are probably unsustainable over the course of a season so regression will not be his friend over the course of the next 5 months.

    Comment by chuckb — April 29, 2011 @ 2:22 pm

  14. His BABIP is high because he doesn’t allow anyone to hit the ball in the air, .335 is probably high but not that unlucky. His FIP against righties was still low. Most of his struggles are due to not getting lefties out.

    Comment by DavidCEisen — April 29, 2011 @ 3:15 pm

  15. Also, groundballers usually see a slightly lower LOB rate, due to allowing more baserunners. Even for an extreme groundballer, 6% below league average sounds a bit unlucky, but a higher BABIP and a lower strand rate are par for the course for groundball pitchers.

    Comment by Nathaniel Dawson — April 29, 2011 @ 9:27 pm

  16. Almost all (perhaps all) of the SPs experiencing a turnaround this young season have low HR rates.

    For a GB pitcher, it’s not that uncommon, perhaps especially for the sinker heavy Masterson and Morton.

    Sure they’ll regress some, but guys like Garcia last year can go the whole season without giving up many homers .. that’s the trade off for giving up more GB hits.

    How are his GIDPs? The odds of giving up 3 GB hits in an inning seem like they would be less than getting a DP.

    Comment by CircleChange11 — April 29, 2011 @ 11:14 pm

  17. One thing that has yet to be mentioned is the fact that he is not falling behind in the count. I love all these stats and can easily see he is benefitting from a low BABIP, low LOB% and low HR/FB, but getting ahead in the count has benefits that these stats can’t show. He’ll obviously regress, but it looks like he got it together above the shoulders and should have a solid season.

    Comment by Jon — April 29, 2011 @ 11:25 pm

  18. Played with him in college, he only starting pitching in high school as a senior, he was a raw talent in Boston, he’s finally learning how to control that 90+ mph slider….dannggggerrrrrrouuuuussssss

    Comment by JayKwiski — April 30, 2011 @ 3:58 am

  19. “In 2009 and 2010, the right-hander’s average on balls in play was roughly 25% more than the league average,”

    Oh, I’ve just seen he was soooooooo unlucky pitcher, lol.

    Comment by gradygradychase — May 1, 2011 @ 10:08 pm

  20. Ground Balls have an average BABIP of .236.

    Its not GB% that drives up BABIP, its line drives.

    Comment by RC — May 2, 2011 @ 9:18 am

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Close this window.

0.269 Powered by WordPress