FanGraphs Baseball


RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Pitch f/x stats put Vogelsong at 45% zone%. He was at 47% last year. It’s still low, but he’s sitting near a number of other good pitchers: Lincecum, Gallardo, Lester, Hanson, Shields, Santana, (and more, it’s a fun list)…

    I wonder how much strike% is related to other things, such as in-zone whiff %, out-of-zone whiff%, and ability to get ahead in the count. (Once you’re ahead — perhaps by throwing early strikes — pitches out of the zone are better choices. If you get behind, pitches in the zone are less valuable, as they are hit harder.)

    Comment by Sky Kalkman — May 9, 2012 @ 11:17 am

  2. The velocity drop is the biggest red flag for me. If the stuff was the same as last year, I would be a lot more confident in Vogelsong.

    Comment by Mark Reynolds — May 9, 2012 @ 11:19 am

  3. Ummm, dude was injured and missed almost all of Spring Training. Now you take a SSS in 2012 and conclude, blah. How about we could also say that the first few games of 2012 for Voglesong were in essence his Spring Training but in MLB games. You could also say beating Kershaw is his first real game back (more than 6 innings pitched) and that his compete level is very high – he won the damn game. Or did you miss that stat?

    \stat fail

    Comment by Monterey Shark — May 9, 2012 @ 11:26 am

  4. Watching the game last he was able to get the ground ball when he needed it and kept the ball down the entire game. It often seems that if he gets a low strike umpire he is more successful. has anyone ever looked statistically at the impact the umpire has on pitch calling? We shouldn’t just assume it’s equal across the board.

    Comment by Hurtlockertwo — May 9, 2012 @ 11:32 am

  5. It’s worth noting he has 3 IBB already (only Matt Moore has more, at 4) accounting for 12/525 pitches (or 2.3%).

    I think these are counted in Zone% ?

    Comment by LAGiantsfan — May 9, 2012 @ 11:42 am

  6. Via Brooks, Vogelsong throws somewhat more sinkers and curves on 0-0 counts, and those are the two pitches he throws most often for strikes. The sinker has a very low whiff rate, and hitters rarely swing at the curve. Seems like a good way to either get ahead in the count or get an early ground out.

    (Sample size from 2012, for sure, but the concept of this approach is intriguing.)

    Comment by Sky Kalkman — May 9, 2012 @ 11:54 am

  7. I’ve watched most Giants games over the past two years and less favorable strike-calling from umpires in 2012 was the first thing that popped into my mind when I read the bit about his “command” problems. My impression is that Vogelsong is essentially pitching the same now as he did last year, he’s just hasn’t gotten as generous a strikezone in several of his five starts. Over the course of the season, that should even out.

    He’s a ~55 gamescore pitcher: a little above-average, but nothing special. But the Giants don’t need him to be special, but rather just give them 6-7 solid innings every five days. And that’s exactly what he’s done.

    Comment by walt526 — May 9, 2012 @ 12:03 pm

  8. I’ve asked the same question, nothing but silence. I’d also like to see someone look at accuracy to target (glove), as opposed to SZ.

    Comment by channelclemente — May 9, 2012 @ 1:18 pm

  9. This was a very interesting and informative post.
    My only quibble is that Vogelsong’s being the #5 starter should have been mentioned.

    Comment by Baltar — May 9, 2012 @ 1:50 pm

  10. (Yawn). Another post about another Giants pitcher who is going to regress any day now. Hey, I have an idea! Maybe you could write one about Matt Cain tomorrow. I don’t think we’ve had one on him for awhile.

    Comment by DrBGiantsfan — May 9, 2012 @ 2:41 pm

  11. I have a number of points I would like to make.

    First off, if I remember right, xFIP assumes that pitchers have no control over HR/FB ratio. However, Fangraphs has authored a series of articles discussing the fact that under Righetti, the Giants have been able to sustain a much lower rate of homeruns hit, both at home and on the road (started with Cain articles, then Giants/Righetti). Given that, discussing xFIP for any Giants pitcher does not seem apt.

    Second, I would like to point out a sabermetric I like to use that Ron Shandler’s org created and pioneered: Pure Quality Starts or PQS. Here is a link to their discussion of it:

    It is basically a sabermetric oriented way of determining whether a start was a quality start (DOM in their lingo) or a poor start (DIS in their lingo; there is also a middle area that they did not label). I think this will illuminate how well Vogelsong has done this season and how it compares (yes, SSS, but still) with 2011.

    In 2011, his DOM% was 61%, that is, 61% of his starts were DOM starts. Shandler’s group never discussed levels, but I went through all the data and basically pitchers with DOM% in the 40′s are good, those above 50% are great, and those above 70% are elite. His DOM% in 2012 so far is 60%.

    Also not really discussed explicitly but noted in a table, is that low DIS% is a key to keeping a pitcher’s ERA low. Looking through their data set, I saw that pitchers who were not that good in DOM% were still able to maintain a decent ERA if they could avoid the DIS starts. The best are under 20%, the elite are under 10%: Vogelsong had a DIS% of 7% in 2011, 0% so far in 2012.

    Now, I’m not saying that Vogelsong is among the elite of the game: what I’m saying is that his performance is up there with the elite.

    I have no idea how he does it either, but am thankful he hated the Dodgers enough to ignore their offer and ask the Giants one more time to sign him.

    I don’t know how others here feel, but to me, Vogelsong today is clearly not the pitcher he was early in his career. So while comparing his numbers today to how it was before might be interesting, I don’t know that you can make any strong statements regarding any differences between now and then. He clearly learned something in the hinterlands between his MLB stint before and where he is now. How he does it, I don’t really care, other than I hope he teaches it to the other Giants pitchers.

    Comment by obsessivegiantscompulsive — May 9, 2012 @ 3:55 pm

  12. Ironically, per my PQS comment below, he had DOM starts in his first three starts, he just started having problems in his last two starts. That suggests that he arrived ready to pitch.

    Still, this is an apt comment because it is something the author should have noted, that he was out injured and thus that could have affected his pitching thus far this season. Just because he pitched well does not mean that he could not have pitched better had he not been recovering from an injury and was behind in his preparation for this season.

    Comment by obsessivegiantscompulsive — May 9, 2012 @ 5:16 pm

  13. Where in the article does it discuss velocity?

    In any case, if you look at his line of pitches and velocities, while his fastball is down this season, so are all his other pitches, by about the same number, roughly 1.5 MPH, per Fangraph’s Pitch Type data. And as most of us know, separation in velocity between a pitcher’s pitches is a major key to getting batters out, not overall velocity, though that helps if it is high enough.

    But at 35 YO this season, velocity drop is to be expected at some point. As long as he maintains enough speed, plus the separation, he should be able to duplicate his success so far in Vogelsong.v2.

    Still, per the point below about it being spring training for Vogelsong, that could help explain why his velocity is down so far this season. Looking at his velocity graph on Fangraphs, there is clearly an upward curve on his velocity, suggesting that Monterrey Shark’s contention that Vogelsong has been in extended spring training for his early starts is correct, as Vogie builds up strength in his arm during the regular season, instead of spring training when he should have.

    FYI, it would be nice if Fangraphs would provide lines at every 5 MPH interval instead of 10. Hard for me to tell how much MPH he added from first start to last. You need to account for us readers who need bi-focal help now. :^)

    It looks like his FT went from 88 to 92, which is basically the range he was in last season. Same with SL, 86 to 88, which is in range for last season as well. CH too, and his CU was in his range for last year in his last two starts. All in all, his velocity was below what it was last season, but he pitched within his abilities, it seems, and he was back to his regular range for 2011 in his last start, per Fangraphs charts (middle one is Velocity):

    And the following two graphs under the velocity appears to support this explanation, as his horizontal and vertical movement was right in range with last year’s performance.

    This chart shows a nice overall view of his FA velocity:

    His last start was the best of this season, but still low-ish relative to last season for FA, though it looks like you could put it in with last season and it would not have looked out of place. For FT, it was like last season and the prior start was on the low end for last season, CU last two starts were like last season, SL all starts, CH all but middle start.

    Yeah, I think Monterrey Shark’s contention that he’s been in Spring Training mode for his first few starts is accurate, based on the results of each start and the trending from start to start.

    Comment by obsessivegiantscompulsive — May 9, 2012 @ 5:45 pm

  14. That’s a good point, once pitchers get ahead of the count, some do try to get the batters to chase pitches out of the zone in subsequent pitches.

    Comment by obsessivegiantscompulsive — May 9, 2012 @ 5:47 pm

  15. I commented above with velocity analysis, game by game, that suggests that you are spot on with this observation, as his velocity has been rising with each start and in his last start or two, been throwing in the range where he was last season.

    Comment by obsessivegiantscompulsive — May 9, 2012 @ 5:49 pm

  16. Good point.

    Also, if Bochy had taken him out last night and had the reliever throw the four wide ones (right move to have Vogelsong do it, but asking what if), Vogelsong’s BB/9 would be 3.48 BB/9. And if it were the roughly 10% IBB of last season, his BB/9 would be 3.37 BB/9, which is not bad (but not good either). Still, reducing by 1 BB would put his K/BB ratio at a good 2.0, which is the minimum that you want your pitchers at.

    Showing how one extreme outing by any starter could warp his overall numbers early in the season, making prognostications about a pitcher so early in the season a much more difficult thing to do, especially one on the borderline as Vogie was in this case, and also considering that he was still getting himself into shape for the season.

    Comment by obsessivegiantscompulsive — May 9, 2012 @ 5:57 pm

  17. That is a good point.

    Though I would note that most Giants fans acknowledged Vogelsong as the #4 starter pre-season, it was only because he was injured and missed much of spring training that he ended up the 5th starter.

    Still, the performance level of most team’s #4 starter is usually much worse than what Vogelsong has been producing so far in Vogelsong.v2 era. Even if he were to perform at a much worse performance level, as long as he is similar enough to his current self, he would still be better than most team’s #4 starter, as well as #5 starter. Heck, he could be better than some team’s #3 starter.

    People like to point out that Vogelsong won’t repeat 2011, but they are missing the point there. What they don’t realize is that the Giants #5 starter outside of Lincecum, Bumgarner, Cain, Vogelsong, was pretty bad among Dirty, Zito, Surkamp, and thus as long as we get an OK performance out of Zito, we don’t need Vogie to match 2011 in order to have a good season in 2012 overall for the starters, we just need him to have an OK season. Two OK seasons out of Vogie and Zito (like Zito 2009-10) would be about equal to Vogie 2011 and 2011 #5 starters, and that is all we can really ask out of the two of them, anything more is whip cream on top with fudge.

    Mix that with good performances out of Lincecum, Bumgarner, Cain (admittedly hard to conceive considering Timmy’s struggles, but I still think he’ll have a normal season the rest of the way), and the rotation will be very similar to what we got last season.

    I think the bigger worry is surviving the loss of Wilson. Casilla with Lopez working as a paired closer when there are tough lefties to get out, has been doing a good job so far, but Casilla is coming off a 2011 season where he too was DLed with arm issues. I think our bullpen’s overall performance will hinge on both when Hembree comes up and how well he does in coming up, as his K/9 rate is pretty sad so far this season, considering his prior performances. But the season is still very early, especially for relievers.

    Comment by obsessivegiantscompulsive — May 9, 2012 @ 6:09 pm

  18. Lots of good info about Vogelsong.
    Can anyone tell me why the MLB site and the Giants site just leave out Vogie’s stats altogether from 2007 to 2010 when he was in Japan?
    Is no one one interested in these stats and how well he pitched there which obviously helped strengthen and improve his pitching to get him back in the majors?
    His stats are available on the Hanshin Tigers and the Orix Buffaloes but its a pain to look for.

    Comment by Matt — August 26, 2012 @ 9:02 pm

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Current day month ye@r *

Close this window.

0.150 Powered by WordPress