FanGraphs Baseball


RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. eric i think you hit the nail on the head.. those outside cincinnati don’t care about cincinnati.

    i had recalled cueto’s name toward the end of last season along with homer bailey’s but felt that they probalby wouldnt get a chance to “arrive” at the big league level with the leadership in place running that organization.

    i thought the hamilton/volquez trade went virtually unoticed (i was able to draft hamilton in the 6th round of my fantasy draft).

    it seems to me that cueto and volquez are, from an outsiders perspective, the same guy. they can be easily confused for one another.

    Comment by Eric In Boston — July 24, 2008 @ 11:45 am

  2. I think you forgot perhaps the most important 2 facts we need to consider regarding Cueto’s development:
    – He’s 22.
    – He started 2007 in A+ and had just 88 IP in the upper minors coming in to the season.

    His HR/FB is at 14.9%. His HR/9 was 0.85 in the upper minors and his BB/9 rate was under 2.0. It’s extremely likely that this is as bad as Cueto will ever be. He’s gotten a bit over-excited at times and has overthrown, leading to his stuff coming up in the zone and being a tad wild. As he matures emotionally, I think you’re going to see both of those numbers come down. (Consider that on 6/11 he walked 8 Cardinals. He’s not walked more than 3 outside of that appearance)

    He’s got really good stuff, but not quite what Volquez has. I’d say he’s easily going to be a solid #3 and that if he learns to control his emotions a bit better and not overthrow as much, could be a strong #2.

    Comment by Rick — July 24, 2008 @ 12:06 pm

  3. The last couple starts I’ve seen Cueto using his fastball more as a strikeout pitch, to pretty good effectiveness. I think he and Volquez both tend to rely on their (devastating) changeups, and forget that their fastballs regularly hit 94 and 95.
    Both pitchers have extremely bright futures, and Cueto is three years younger. Cut down on the walks and these guys are both superstars, even in GABP.

    Comment by Nate — July 24, 2008 @ 12:08 pm

  4. Cueto is on my fantasy team, I have seen every start he has made and he has define inconsistency. He will tantalize you with a great game, then walk the ballpark the next time (he had an 8 walk game iirc). And within games too, he will have a stretch of 8 retired with 6 strikeouts or something, then implode.
    It seems like the reds’ rotation has a quite bright immediate future, even sans the enigmatic Bailey.

    Comment by Simmy — July 24, 2008 @ 12:27 pm

  5. I drafted Cueto in a pair of deep leagues and have watched a few of his starts. The first thing that caught my attention during his first regular season start was the sound his fastball made when it hit the catcher’s glove. It didn’t *pop* or have the heavy *thud* you get with a hard-sinker. It literally made a loud *crack* sound on impact. I later confirmed it with a friend who was at the game. He and a few others in his section noticed it as well, and they were nowhere near the field of play. I wondered if it had to do with the catcher having a tight pocket, which isn’t unusual early in the season, but I still hear it when I watch him pitch, albeit not as often.

    I also distinctly recall Cueto being aided with a generous strike zone during his early-season dominance of the D-Backs. To his credit, Cueto effectively expanded the bottom of the zone, gradually working his way further and further outside/inside, similar to the way Maddux & Glavine used to do back when the NL strike zone was virtually laying on its side.

    Since those early season starts, however, Cueto’s pitches have been up in the zone more often and over the heart of the plate more often. That’s the bottom line. He’s just a kid. Once he learns it isn’t necessary to overthrow – that under-throwing can be a more effective and conservative alternative – Cueto could settle into a fine career as quality #2 with slight #1 undertones.

    His physical build, throwing motion and fastball remind me a lot of a young Tom Gordon. Replace Gordon’s gravity-bending curve with Cueto’s plus change and two are nearly identical. That may not be a good thing however, because Gordon’s frame wasn’t able to withstand a consistent workload as a starter.

    Comment by Choo — July 24, 2008 @ 1:21 pm

  6. Cueto is the genuine article. Obviously, injury is always a worry for a pitcher his age and Dusty Baker isn’t very careful with his arm: he average 99 pitches per game and there have been several occasions on which he’s cracked 110. That’s not horrible, but I always worry with a 22 year old. Baring injury, we’ll see him around in the next few years.

    Cueto obviously has the skills to strike batters out, and I see no reason to think he won’t improve his (already acceptable) control.

    The biggest problem in his game is a high fly ball rate: 37.8% isn’t going to make him a star pitcher, especially in Great American. (Okay, it’s possible to be a star with a ground ball rate like that, but you have to pitch like Johan Santana to do it.)

    If Cueto can pull a John Danks (Danks has improved his GB% by 10% this year), Cueto can be a legitimate star. But until then, he’s a No. 2/3 pitcher.

    Comment by philosofool — July 24, 2008 @ 3:20 pm

  7. Guys, thanks for all your takes on it, it’s definitely beneficial to note. Yeah, most will forget he’s only 22 and if he can harness his raw tools he should make for a great #3 starter, perhaps even better in a few years. Cutting down on walks isn’t necessarily a given for him, however, just like it isn’t a given for all pitchers who initially struggle with them. Look at Daniel Cabrera: he throws hard and his 4.16 BB/9 right now is the best of his career.

    Not to say he is Cabrera but just that it shouldn’t be set in stone that he, in fact, is an automatic lock to cut back on walks.

    Comment by Eric Seidman — July 24, 2008 @ 3:26 pm

  8. Cueto is also on my fantasy team, and I refuse to sit him. He’s better than this, I’m just waiting for it to turn around. His minor league career shows great control, so that will probably get better with time.

    Comment by dan — July 24, 2008 @ 3:58 pm

  9. At the start of the season until early June, Keith Law was adamant that Cueto had a brighter future than Volquez. His argument was that Cueto had better command of stuff that was almost as good, and I really think the numbers bear that out.

    Volquez’ sample size of performance at this level is growing, but he hadn’t shown any indication he could pitch so well prior to this year (outside of 51 AAA innings in 2007). His past is littered with command troubles and with his BB/9 at 4.33 even in this break-out season, I think a little caution is warranted.

    I’ve kept my eye and Cueto all along and still think he has a pretty good chance to make us all forget about Volquez in 5 years or so.

    Comment by Mark Runsvold — July 24, 2008 @ 4:15 pm

  10. Yeah, I agree Mark, we’re going to flip-flop between these guys for quite some time.

    Comment by Eric Seidman — July 24, 2008 @ 4:48 pm

  11. Agree with last comment–Cueto will be the REDS best pitcher the next 5 yrs. if he stays healthy.

    Comment by Doug S. — July 25, 2008 @ 2:51 pm

  12. . I think that female DJs can be just as good and even better than men at djing. What do you think?

    Comment by susan roberts — February 16, 2010 @ 12:42 pm

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Close this window.

0.328 Powered by WordPress