Andruw Jones

So far, Andruw Jones hasn’t had the start to his Dodger career that anyone would have hoped for. His .149/.259/.234 line would make him a decent hitting pitcher, but as an $18 million dollar per year slugging outfielder, it’s pretty miserable. Is there something we can see in the graphs here that might give us an idea of why he’s struggled out of the gates?

Andruw Jones GB/FB/LD

The batted ball distribution in 2008 shows two clear changes from his career norms; a nearly 20% uptick in ground ball rate, which corresponds to declines in flyball and line drive rates. Instead of lifting the ball and driving it, Jones is hitting the ball on the ground at a rate that would categorize him as a slash-and-dash hitter who uses his speed to try to leg out infield singles. Perhaps 10 years ago, he might have been able to make that work, but not anymore. He relies on his abilities in the box to get him on base, and he’s just not capable of creating offense while he’s pounding the ball into the dirt.

The sample is still small enough, so we shouldn’t jump to any conclusions about this being a definite change in skills. However, if you’re looking for a sign that Andruw is breaking out of his slump, look for him to get the ball in the air – when he starts getting lift in his swing again, the results will follow naturally.




Print This Post



Dave is a co-founder of USSMariner.com and contributes to the Wall Street Journal.

4 Responses to “Andruw Jones”

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
  1. dan says:

    Well he also has to hit the ball in order to get it in the air. His 29.8% k-rate isn’t getting it done either.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  2. wrveres says:

    we need a lazy index.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  3. Kevin Orris says:

    Not to be a smart ass, but I hoped for this start. As a life long Braves fan, watching him last year killed all respect I had for him.

    If every pitcher would throw him low and away, I don’t know that he would ever get a hit.

    Too bad there is no “designated fielder” position.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  4. Ingy says:

    Unfortunate that it didn’t work out the way this article thought it would. OWNED!

    Vote -1 Vote +1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Current day month ye@r *