Brandon Morrow Dominates Angels, Strike Zone

Brandon Morrow entered the 2012 season as one of MLB’s ultimate “what if” pitchers. He has owned excellent peripheral statistics throughout his entire career but has struggled mightily with balls in play and with stranding runners, resulting in ERAs much higher than estimators like FIP or xFIP or SIERA would have us expect. Morrow wouldn’t be the first pitcher to prove an exception to DiPS theory — Ricky Nolasco, for example, has followed a similar path. Morrow’s excellent strikeout-inducing stuff — three seasons over 10 K/9 — and his past two seasons with FIPs well below the league average led many to ponder what could happen if he puts it all together.

Oddly enough, entering last night’s start against the Angels, Morrow was excelling in the same facets of the game that typically kill him. He owned a 3.03 ERA despite just 21 strikeouts in 32.2 innings and seven home runs allowed, but a .215 BABIP and exceptional control kept runners off the bases. The Brandon Morrow of old really hadn’t surfaced — the one with all the potential and all the strikeouts — but he was more effective than ever, living off pinpoint control (2.2 BB/9) and his fielders as opposed swings and misses.

Last night against the Angels, Morrow threw a three-hit, eight-strikeout shutout, bringing together the best of both worlds.

Morrow didn’t quite outdo Jered Weaver‘s performance at The Big A just one day before, but he came about as close to an encore as you can get. He was nearly flawless, keeping 11 of 20 balls in play on the ground and not issuing a single free pass. It took just 102 pitches to dispatch the 27 outs, and he threw just 27 balls to 75 strikes. He drew eight swinging strikes — a roughly average number for a starting pitcher throwing 100 pitches — but was able to pound the strike zone without resistance. The Angels took 30 called strikes against Morrow, with 18 of those coming on the first pitch:

It was this ability to draw strike one unopposed which allowed Morrow to dominate. As a result, a whopping 46 of his 102 pitches came in either 0-1, 0-2 or 1-2 counts, covering 21 of the 28 batters he faced. Of these 21 batters, only one reached base. All eight of his strikeouts passed through such a count (even though a few ended in full counts) and the others were dispatched through seven groundouts, two popouts, a double play, and two flyouts.

Success in favorable counts is nothing new for Morrow. Last season, when Morrow recorded just a 4.72 ERA, hitters hit no better than .216 through any count in which there were more strikes than balls. The issue was getting to those counts. Of his 3112 pitches, only 944 came in such counts last season, or 30.3%. Thursday night — Morrow’s first truly dominant performance of the season — was the first time Morrow managed to consistently get into those counts. Just 124 of his first 512 pitches of the season (24.2%) came in these pitchers’ counts. This is largely because hitters have been more than happy to take the first pitch against Morrow — over 80% of the time — and Morrow hadn’t taken advantage with first pitch strikes until Thursday.

Morrow has fantastic secondary pitches, but when batters get ahead in the count, they can take these pitches and wait for the fastball. Even with his excellent velocity, Morrow’s fastball isn’t good enough to blow by hitters every time, particularly in hitters’ counts when they can sit on it with little consequence if they’re wrong. But as we saw on Thursday, when Morrow can work ahead of the count and keep hitters off balance with the full mixture of pitches, he is nearly unhittable. If he can continue to work ahead with a combination of control and pure stuff, we could finally see the total package Morrow’s peripheral numbers have teased us with for years.



Print This Post



Jack Moore's work can be seen at VICE Sports and anywhere else you're willing to pay him to write. Buy his e-book.


Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Oliver
Guest
Oliver
4 years 2 months ago

That is simply the best graphic representation of pitch distribution I’ve seen yet. Usually they’re totally illegible. Thanks!

gobears
Member
gobears
4 years 2 months ago

The usefulness is heightened by also showing a good number of pitches, not a crazy smear of dozens. I second the motion: nice work.

Andre the Angels Fan
Guest
Andre the Angels Fan
4 years 2 months ago

FML

Pat
Guest
Pat
4 years 2 months ago

Brandon Morrow- you’re doing it wrong.

Worse peripherals, better results. Me= confused.

Peter
Guest
Peter
4 years 2 months ago

Fun fact: Brandon Morrow has not walked a better in his last two games. If I’m not mistaken, he had walked at least one batter in all 73 of his previous career starts.

Coodle
Member
Coodle
4 years 2 months ago

Another fun fact: It took Morrow until his last start last season, 173.1 innings, to induce a double play. He has 5 so far this season. It goes without saying that he’s made a conscious effort to induce contact, to be more efficient on the mound. I think he described it as “pitching”.

I liked rooting for the old Brandon, but I’m not complaining about this one. I’ll gleefully ride the results for now.

Caleb W
Guest
Caleb W
4 years 2 months ago

The start against the Angels wasn’t his first truly dominant performance….he went six scoreless with 9 K and no BBs in his previous start on 4/28. Sure, it was the Mariners, but I describe that as dominant.

Zach
Guest
Zach
4 years 2 months ago

Cobweb Woward!

Damaso's Burnt Shirt
Guest
Damaso's Burnt Shirt
4 years 2 months ago

Everyone points to his 17K 1 hitter against TB. It was an amazing start, but it took 137 pitches. Also, how often does a guy strike out 17 Batters? Not often.

This performance was, for lack of a better word, can be sustainable. Above average Ks but not 10K/9, lots of grounders, quick innings. This was Roy Halladay type dominance. Almost brought a tear to my eye.

soupman
Member
soupman
4 years 2 months ago

he basically only threw 2 pitches yesterday (not totally true: he threw 2 curves, the rest were FB/SL). this is basically his approach in the past, as you indicate. not sure i’d expect the results to differ from the past, and would more inclined to chalk yesterday up to the element of surprise and throwing off the advanced scouts than morrow actually “figuring it out”.

Zer
Guest
Zer
4 years 2 months ago

His approach yesterday was excellent. His fastball command was nearly flawless. So what that yesterday was a “similar approach in the past”, he threw first pitch strikes, and the article clearly stated that this was the difference. And it was.

ddriver80
Member
ddriver80
4 years 2 months ago

He actually was pitching down at 92-93 most of the night and was more effective then when he has been sitting 94 for the rest of his career. He’s getting more movement and control by pitching with less velocity. He has figured it out. Earlier in the year he was doing the same things, same approach, but hadn’t learned how to keep the ball down in the zone.

jessef
Guest
4 years 2 months ago

As much as I like Brandon, one word of caution: he was facing a preponderance of righthanded batters. That aside, he is awesome and will continue to be so.

Infield Fly
Guest
Infield Fly
4 years 2 months ago

Also helping out Morrow is that by keeping his BB% down he isn’t having to pitch out of the stretch as often. This has been the bane of his existence in the past.

Andrew
Guest
Andrew
4 years 2 months ago

4 BBs in the last 11 innings. Yesterday (5/14/12) against the Rays he was seemingly throwing 40% changeups, and something resembling a 89mph sinker. 4-seamer sat at 90-91, touched 94 maybe twice. Didn’t see the slider much.

Very confused.

Andrew
Guest
Andrew
4 years 2 months ago

*8 BBs (4 each start)

SSS
Guest
SSS
4 years 2 months ago

You win the small sample size award. And that 89 mph sinker you thought you saw, was a slider.

wpDiscuz