“Clutch” as used on FanGraphs is defined as the following:
Clutch – How much better or worse a player does in high leverage situations than he would have done in a context neutral environment.
Does anyone have a problem with that as a non-mathematical definition for what people mean at the highest level when they talk about being clutch? Generally, they actually mean “players that do well,” but generally those are good players. Good players doing well are not “clutch,” they are just good. To truly measure the ideal of “clutch” you would have to compare the person’s performance against what you would expect normally. That’s what gets done here.
With that in mind, check this out.
I only included 2002-present because that is what FanGraphs currently has and I don’t have historical postseason WPA. That being said, here’s some numbers covering the years not mentioned above.
That A-Rod, boy he sucks in the postseason. If only he were more like The Captain.
Print This Post