Chapman, Rondon, and Two Types of 100

According to the best data I can access, so far this year there have been 425 pitches thrown at least 100 miles per hour. Andrew Cashner‘s got one. Nathan Eovaldi‘s got one. Matt Harvey‘s got two. Bruce Rondon‘s got 104. Aroldis Chapman‘s got 196. To set a cutoff at 100 is arbitrary, but it feels natural, and 100 definitely has the feel of a magic number. A fastball at 100 is, officially, a fastball in the triple digits. Within the realm of 100+ mile-per-hour fastballs, Rondon and Chapman, combined, have thrown more than twice as many as everybody else. The next-highest total after Rondon’s 104 is Kelvin Herrera‘s 45, and there’s long been talk that the PITCHf/x in Kansas City is miscalibrated.

What Chapman’s got over Rondon is peak velocity — Chapman, this year, has topped out at 104. What Rondon’s got over Chapman is consistency — 24% of Rondon’s pitches have reached 100, against Chapman’s 19%. Rondon has the harder average fastball. If you isolate only those fastballs thrown at least 100, Rondon and Chapman tie with an average velocity of 101. Clearly, these are the game’s premier flame-throwers. But while they both throw similar heat — similar, virtually unparalleled heat — the results have been considerably different. We’ve been seeing two types of 100 mile-per-hour fastballs.

Take a look at Chapman’s fastest swinging strike:

Chapman103.gif.opt

An unhittable 103.4. Take a look at Rondon’s fastest swinging strike:

Rondon103.gif.opt

A seemingly unhittable 102.8. What Rondon lacked in actual velocity, he made up for in perceived velocity, as the hitter sees inside pitches as being faster than outside pitches. Watch these clips and you’d think, yeah, these are both swing-and-miss fastballs. Two-strike fastballs, putaway fastballs. Fastballs that can be both the foundation and the structure above.

Yet the numbers tell a different story. We’ve long known about Rondon’s heat, and it was because of that heat he was in the mix as a spring-training closer candidate, but the overall season numbers might tip you off. As an American League reliever, Rondon has so far posted a league-average strikeout rate. As a National League reliever, Chapman has so far posted double the league-average strikeout rate. The similarities end with the radar gun.

Baseball Prospectus provides handy PITCHf/x leaderboards. I looked at all relievers who have generated at least 100 swings this year against their four-seam fastballs. That gave me a pool of 143. Chapman’s contact rate allowed is the third-lowest, out of first by half of one percentage point. Rondon’s contact rate allowed is the 94th-lowest, or the 50th-highest. Rondon is right there with guys like Tommy Hunter and Henry Rodriguez, but he’s also right there with guys like Josh Roenicke and George Kontos. You’d expect better from a guy who has topped out at 103.

That’s looking at all fastballs. Let’s narrow down to only those fastballs at or beyond 100 miles per hour. After all, that’s the real purpose here, and as a reminder, Rondon has thrown 104 such fastballs, while Chapman has thrown 196. They’ve posted similar strike rates, and similar swing rates. Batters have swung at Rondon’s best heaters 53 times, making contact 43 times. Of 27 balls in play, they’ve recorded eight hits. Batters have swung at Chapman’s best heaters 102 times, making contact 55 times. Of 17 balls in play, they’ve recorded three hits. A summary:

  • Rondon, 100+: 81% contact
  • Rondon, 100+: 51% in-play
  • Chapman, 100+: 54% contact
  • Chapman, 100+: 17% in-play

The differences between the raw numbers are dramatic. Now there are a few things we have to consider. One is that pitches don’t exist individually in isolation, existing rather as functions of the entire repertoire. In addition to his fastball, Chapman also throws a wipeout slider, that has Rondon’s secondary stuff beat. Chapman’s fastball wouldn’t work as well were it not for his slider. His slider wouldn’t work as well were it not for his fastball. Everything is inter-dependent, because baseball is obnoxiously complicated.

Additionally, Chapman uses his fastball more often in putaway counts, counts where he might specifically be going for a swing and miss. With two strikes, five of six Chapman pitches are heaters. With two strikes, half of Rondon’s pitches are heaters. Of course, this might be due to Chapman’s fastball being so unhittable, not the other way around. Good luck with proving causation.

I think the biggest factor is probably pitch location. Let’s look at all of Chapman and Rondon’s 100+ mile-per-hour fastballs:

rondonchapman1

Now let’s look only at those 100+ mile-per-hour fastballs that were swung at:

rondonchapman2

Rondon doesn’t pound the bottom of the zone by any means, but Chapman clearly likes to live up. Chapman’s average fast fastball has come in 2.9 feet above the ground. The average whiff has been at a pitch 3.0 feet above the ground. Rondon’s average fast fastball has come in 2.3 feet above the ground. The average whiff has been at a pitch 2.5 feet above the ground. These are differences of about a half-foot, and while that might not seem very big, the actual pitching zone isn’t very big. Lower fastballs tend to go for contact and grounders. Higher fastballs tend to go for whiffs and fly balls. Chapman uses his heat in a way to maximize swings and misses. He just tries to blow it right by hitters. Rondon is presumably capable of that, but he seems to be going more for strikes and weaker contact. Rondon has tried to stay more down in the zone, whereas Chapman has dared hitters to try to take him deep.

I can’t really speak to their deceptiveness, nor can I speak to their release points. It might be a little harder to see the ball against Chapman. He’s a little taller, so he should release the ball a little closer to the plate. That means less time for the ball in the air, which means increased perceived velocity, which means better results for the pitcher. There’s a lot that might be going on here, but it’s plainly obvious that Chapman and Rondon use their fastballs differently, causing similarly extreme heaters to generate very different results. Chapman tries to miss bats. If Rondon does, he generally does it with a different pitch.

A pitcher is blessed if he’s able to throw really hard. Because of his arm strength, Bruce Rondon could have one hell of a future. Because of his arm strength, he also draws some comparisons to Aroldis Chapman, but there’s a hell of a lot more that goes into pitching than how hard you can throw. Rondon has it in him to develop into a strikeout fireman. If he changes the way he uses his heater, he could conceivably get a lot more swings and misses. But right now it just isn’t the same pitch that Chapman throws. Rondon has a hard fastball, but he doesn’t have a strikeout fastball. Too often, people think those go hand in hand. Everything is less simple than you want it to be.




Print This Post



Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

41 Responses to “Chapman, Rondon, and Two Types of 100”

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
  1. BSLJeffLong says:

    “because baseball is obnoxiously complicated.”

    +28 Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Ivan Grushenko says:

      This has to be the best line I’ve read today.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Nick44 says:

        Baseball has obvious objective outcomes (runs, wins) that are very easy to measure and record. That makes it easier to study than lots of other scientific pursuits. Sure it may be hard to tie the independent variables to the dependent ones, but it helps when those dependent variables start out so well defined because it is a game.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

  2. Dragbunter says:

    You missed the obvious. Chapman is a southpaw like Barry Zito and Jamie Moyer.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Brad Johnson says:

      This did seem to be worth mentioning in the section about not commenting on release points. Chapman just looks terrifying to left-handers. And unsurprisingly (in a small small sample), he’s struck out half of left-handed batters faced and their collective wOBA is nearly 100 points lower than righties. The numbers for his career are similar.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  3. wes roehl says:

    “To set a cutoff at 100 is arbitrary.” Ok, so why not take the distribution of fastballs, and either (a) look for a natural break in the upper tail of the distribution or (b) talk about the top 1% or the top 2% of fastballs in the distribution?

    wes

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  4. Two Types of One Hundred says:

    1. 100
    ii. C

    +14 Vote -1 Vote +1

  5. I don’t see the number in that color test.

    +7 Vote -1 Vote +1

  6. Darrell Berger says:

    I’ve watched Bruce all year and this is right on. Many, many of his 100 MPH pitches are simply almost in the dirt and often the first pitch to a batter. All he has done is throw ball one AND given the hitter a look at his fastest pitch. It’s almost like he has to “announce his presence with authority” like Nuke LaLoosh in Bull Durham, THEN he starts to pitch. He does have fine secondary stuff and, yes, gets a lot of empty swings with it. I think he just needs to learn how to throw the best pitch in baseball: strike one.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  7. Ben says:

    It’s kind of funny that the first place Chapman looks after the strikeout is the radar gun. He quite notorious for this and it has gotten him into trouble before.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  8. JMo37 says:

    I am not 100% certain, but I think it was Brad Penny. He was pitching an away game and they had the radar gun turned lower on purpose. He said he came out of warms ups and felt great. He got on the mound and was doing his thing and looked at the gun, “92″. Penny thought he was throwing harder than normal, but because of the reading he kept really trying to dial it up (he was notorious for looking at gun readings). He said he was gassed by the 4th inning because he kept trying to hit 95-97 and could not.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  9. MickeyTettletonHOF says:

    The Mets used to turn off the radar gun on the scoreboard when Armando Benitez was pitching. That’s why he was more successful in New York than in Baltimore.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  10. DetroitMichael says:

    Because of my poor reading comprehension for a brief second I thought that the article stated that Chapman has topped out at 196 MPH.

    “What a classic Jeff Sullivan zinger! That is a clear exaggeration for the pure purpose of hilarity!” I bellowed. My live-in girlfriend agreed. “How ludicrous!” Then I read it again.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  11. Joe says:

    I think Chapman’s deception is a huge factor. He gets unreal amounts of hip/torso separation which allows his arm to become visible later in his delivery while it is at a higher speed (larger area to allow acceleration). He also has a very quick delivery with a very long stride (especially for someone who is already 6’4″). Even just watching him throw and watching hitters try to hit him, I can see a difference between him and every other pitcher I’ve ever seen.

    Also, I believe there was a Sports Science episode that looked at his deception…

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Iron says:

      This. Having the opportunity to watch him pitch three times while sitting directly behind homeplate make of 3 of my top 10 live baseball viewing experiences. It is a joy to watch and like Joe said, a difference between him and every other pitcher I’ve ever seen.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  12. Mr. X says:

    To be fair, Rondon is a rookie

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  13. Karma199 says:

    I am not sure if I buy into the concept that a 102 mph fast appears as fast as a 104 mph. Because at that speed I doubt there is too much difference since it’s only going 60.5 feet.

    I would do the actual math but I it’s 3:30am and I am tired.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • ErnestoSalvaderi says:

      It takes .404412 seconds to go 60.5ft at 102 mph
      It takes .396635 seconds to go 60.5ft at 104 mph

      .007777 difference is about %1.92

      Oh look at that, it’s the weekend.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Karma199 says:

      I’ll make an amendment the ball may not actually travel 60.5 feet since it could be released at different points so that could make that math more complex.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  14. Greg Roark says:

    Great article, this makes a ton of sense to me because sports science did a piece on Chapman and his velocity , not only does it he throw so hard he gets down the mound the fastest in baseball in terms of load to release and that allows him to really extend his release point out. every foot closer to the plate is like adding 3mph to the pitch , so while Rondon is throwing 103 , Chapman is appearing to throw 106+

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  15. Dan Farnsworth says:

    Another contributing factor might be the “rise” on their respective fastballs. Chapman’s comes in at 10.7″ and Rondon’s comes in at 7.3″. That coupled with location could make a pretty big difference in opposing hitter contact rate.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Brandon T says:

      YEah, I was just gonna say… movement on pitches makes them harder to hit, and we aren’t offered any information on that. There’s also the fact that some pitchers release the ball closer to the plate than others — which can make their fastball play up or down. That’s one of the things that made Randy Johnson so effective — it was almost as if he could tuck a pitch in your breast pocket.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  16. Joey says:

    Chapman also gets closer to the plate with his stride and how long his arms are so his 103 only has to travel 52 or so feet while Rondon is throwing from 53 or 54 feet, and in terms of reaction time 3.5 inches is equal to 1 mph in perceived velocity. So Chapman might throw a tick less according to the radar gun, but there is actually less time to react to his gas.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Current day month ye@r *