<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Counterpoints to Starting Burnett tonight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/counterpoints-to-starting-burnett-tonight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/counterpoints-to-starting-burnett-tonight/</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 01:25:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: phoenix</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/counterpoints-to-starting-burnett-tonight/#comment-303568</link>
		<dc:creator>phoenix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=33034#comment-303568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[maybe this is stupid but how about this for a series rotation?

game one: sabathia vs wilson
game two: pettitte vs lewis
game three: burnett vs lee
game four:  sabathia vs hunter
game five: hughes vs wilson
game six: pettitte vs lewis
game seven: sabathia vs lee

from the yankees standpoint it has to look better than what they did. i know its a moot point now, but what does anyone else think about this set up?  games 1 and 4 definitely give advantage to the yanks, and they give up game 3, but games 2, 5, and 6 seem even enough or favor the yanks, and then you get sabathia in game 7.  its two (semi)guaranteed wins against one (semi)guaranteed loss with 4 that can go either way. has to be better than giving up (semi)guaranteed losses in games 3, 4, and 7 right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe this is stupid but how about this for a series rotation?</p>
<p>game one: sabathia vs wilson<br />
game two: pettitte vs lewis<br />
game three: burnett vs lee<br />
game four:  sabathia vs hunter<br />
game five: hughes vs wilson<br />
game six: pettitte vs lewis<br />
game seven: sabathia vs lee</p>
<p>from the yankees standpoint it has to look better than what they did. i know its a moot point now, but what does anyone else think about this set up?  games 1 and 4 definitely give advantage to the yanks, and they give up game 3, but games 2, 5, and 6 seem even enough or favor the yanks, and then you get sabathia in game 7.  its two (semi)guaranteed wins against one (semi)guaranteed loss with 4 that can go either way. has to be better than giving up (semi)guaranteed losses in games 3, 4, and 7 right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phoenix</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/counterpoints-to-starting-burnett-tonight/#comment-303341</link>
		<dc:creator>phoenix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 17:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=33034#comment-303341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i agree. i think that giving up game 3 by pitching burnett was preferable than wasting pettitte and giving up both games 3 and 4 by pitching burnett then.  sure they always have a shot with pettitte and he pitched well, but against lee they had no chance it seemed from the very beginning. then they pitch burnett which is just asking for a loss, so why not pitch him in a game that they are likely to lose anyways? then pettitte can win them game 4 (which if you swap out pettitte&#039;s start for burnett&#039;s, would make the yankees winners).  of couse the fallacy of predetermined results come in here, but still pettitte&gt;burnett and lee&gt;pettitte and pettitte&gt;hunter and hunter&gt;burnett. so then why not lose burnett vs lee and win pettite vs hunter? instead they just conceded both...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree. i think that giving up game 3 by pitching burnett was preferable than wasting pettitte and giving up both games 3 and 4 by pitching burnett then.  sure they always have a shot with pettitte and he pitched well, but against lee they had no chance it seemed from the very beginning. then they pitch burnett which is just asking for a loss, so why not pitch him in a game that they are likely to lose anyways? then pettitte can win them game 4 (which if you swap out pettitte&#8217;s start for burnett&#8217;s, would make the yankees winners).  of couse the fallacy of predetermined results come in here, but still pettitte&gt;burnett and lee&gt;pettitte and pettitte&gt;hunter and hunter&gt;burnett. so then why not lose burnett vs lee and win pettite vs hunter? instead they just conceded both&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pft</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/counterpoints-to-starting-burnett-tonight/#comment-302640</link>
		<dc:creator>pft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 05:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=33034#comment-302640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The debate to pitch AJ or CC seems to be a straw man to me.  The main question was whether AJ should have been used in game 3 and saving Pettitte for a game in which his odds of winning are higher.  Instead of conceding game 3 and hoping for a miracle, they tried to win it and failed, and then were left to hope for a miracle that AJ would pitch better than his season average numbers in game 4, which he did until Girardi pulled a Grady Little imitation.

CC did not really pitch well in game 1, so nobody can say how pitching on 3 days rest would effect him, especially as he had an extended bullpen session to work on some issues.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The debate to pitch AJ or CC seems to be a straw man to me.  The main question was whether AJ should have been used in game 3 and saving Pettitte for a game in which his odds of winning are higher.  Instead of conceding game 3 and hoping for a miracle, they tried to win it and failed, and then were left to hope for a miracle that AJ would pitch better than his season average numbers in game 4, which he did until Girardi pulled a Grady Little imitation.</p>
<p>CC did not really pitch well in game 1, so nobody can say how pitching on 3 days rest would effect him, especially as he had an extended bullpen session to work on some issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not David</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/counterpoints-to-starting-burnett-tonight/#comment-302452</link>
		<dc:creator>Not David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 01:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=33034#comment-302452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*yawn*]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*yawn*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NotDave</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/counterpoints-to-starting-burnett-tonight/#comment-302417</link>
		<dc:creator>NotDave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=33034#comment-302417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most important counterpoint:  The umpires will ensure the Yankees win this important game, just as they did in game 1 and 2 of the ALDS.  Cano&#039;s &quot;home run&quot;...please.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most important counterpoint:  The umpires will ensure the Yankees win this important game, just as they did in game 1 and 2 of the ALDS.  Cano&#8217;s &#8220;home run&#8221;&#8230;please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bronnt</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/counterpoints-to-starting-burnett-tonight/#comment-302275</link>
		<dc:creator>Bronnt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=33034#comment-302275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you&#039;ve got to go with the comfortbility factor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;ve got to go with the comfortbility factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff Lee's Changeup</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/counterpoints-to-starting-burnett-tonight/#comment-302252</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff Lee's Changeup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=33034#comment-302252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also its pretty clear that some pitchers are able to take the abuse and some aren&#039;t. Its a more personalized issue then one that can be made on the weight of such general evidence. But I would argue that this supports your conclusion, CC is better prepared to win game 4 then AJ. Its just a question of what do you do in games 5-6-7]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also its pretty clear that some pitchers are able to take the abuse and some aren&#8217;t. Its a more personalized issue then one that can be made on the weight of such general evidence. But I would argue that this supports your conclusion, CC is better prepared to win game 4 then AJ. Its just a question of what do you do in games 5-6-7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
