Cubs Sign Reed Johnson; Scrappers Celebrate

On Wednesday morning, the Chicago Cubs came to an agreement for a one-year deal with free agent OF Reed Johnson. The Cubs are no strangers with Johnson — three of the last four times Johnson has signed a contract, it had “Cubs” literally written all over it (counting this most recent transaction).

It may be surprising to the Cubs fan base, however, that one of the staples of the Jim Hendry regime — the scrappy fourth outfielder Johnson — has been voluntarily re-added to the roster. However, Speedy Reedy should not be found guilty by association.

The truth is: Reed Johnson, hey, he’s not all that bad.

Johnson started his career with the Toronto Blue Jays, earning a starter’s haul of PAs from 2003 through 2006. During that time, he put together only a single season over 2.0 WAR (the 2006 season) and generally looked unimpressive.

After the Jays released him 2008, the Cubs took in the yet-to-be-amazing Johnson to play the role of their great white scraptastic hope — y’know, the quick little Caucasian fellow who dives headlong into brick walls and such. As a 31-year-old fourth outfielder, Johnson culled together 374 outfield PAs while in a weird timeshare with Mark DeRosa, and Johnson ended the year with a nifty 1.6 WAR.

Johnson then went on to play two feh seasons, one with the Cubs, one with the Dodgers. His perceived value shrank as his age grew, earning only $800K with Los Angeles.

When, the Cubs re-signed Johnson for $990K in 2011, years after his first appearance in Chicago, I was upset — mostly because Johnson blocked one of my all-time favorite players, the exceptional Mr. Fernando Perez, for the 4th OF position. But, much despite my consternation, Johnson had a great year, hitting .354 wOBA and 120 wRC+ in his 266 PAs.

Suddenly, after his 2011 fun-bomb, Johnson looks like a different player. Putting his last four years together (age 31 through 34) and prorating those numbers to 600 PAs, Johnson actually comes at as a 2.0 WAR player.

He’s not a stellar base runner (11 steal, 10 caught stealing, and 0.4 BsR in the last four season). He’s not an amazing fielder (0.3 UZR over his last four seasons). He’s not a great hitter (.330 wOBA and 98 wRC+ since 2008).

He’s just Johnson. Average.

But, since he has displayed no particular weaknesses since getting relegated to part-time duty (where he can focus on mashing lefties, which is his specialty), Johnson has become a relatively valuable asset. Which is nice, especially since he is pretty cheap these days.

Let’s face it, though, the Cubs are not yet a playoff team. And unless Alfonso Soriano (with less than 2.0 WAR in two of his last three seasons) finds a fountain of youth in 2012, the Cubs may siphon quite a few PAs to Johnson next year.

For the Cubs and their current situation, Johnson makes sense. The recent-slash-impending trade of Sean Marshall to the Cincinnati Reds should signal to fans pretty clearly the Cubs do not anticipate much competitiveness in 2012.

Still, stranger things have happened. Cubs President of Baseball Operations Theo Epstein just watched his 2011 Red Sox lose a Wild Card spot to a Tampa Bay Rays team that was in a self-proclaimed “reloading” season. And, now with a second Wild Card, the Cubs have more chances than ever to slip into October’s dance.

At the same time, the club is stuck between a rock and Carlos Zambrano‘s contract. As my buddy mb21 notes, the Cubs have, in essence too many dead assets to fully engage in a rebuilding process:

The reality is that even if they trade several of their players, they’re not going to get all that much in return… Other than [Matt Garza and Sean Marshall], though, the Cubs just don’t have a whole lot.


A complete and total rebuild sounds wonderful, but it’s not like the Cubs are going to be selling that many valuable pieces. When Matt Garza is your most valuable trade piece you just aren’t going to replenlish an already weak farm system with much of an upgrade.

Theo Epstein has repeatedly mentioned the Cubs have entered the asset collection business. Unfortunately, the team is in possession of some negative-value assets.

The hope, I imagine, is to turn some of his contracts-worth-more-than-production situations into prospects, but with that being a trick only a few GMs can manage every once in a while, the Cubs — and Cubs fans — are going to have to be content with patience. And with more averageish production.

And with Reed Johnson.

Print This Post

Bradley writes for FanGraphs and The Hardball Times. Follow him on Twitter @BradleyWoodrum.

20 Responses to “Cubs Sign Reed Johnson; Scrappers Celebrate”

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
  1. SC2GG says:

    “After the Jays released him 2008, the Cubs took in the yet-to-be-amazing Johnson”

    Did you completely discount his amazing 2006 season as a starter for the Jays, where he was worth 4.5 WAR? He was really good that year! He had less than 500AB too.

    Later, you go:
    “Johnson started his career with the Toronto Blue Jays, earning a starter’s haul of PAs from 2003 through 2006. During that time, he put together only a single season over 2.0 WAR (the 2006 season) and generally looked unimpressive.”

    Well, yes, as I said before, that single season over 2.0 WAR was really impressive. You could say he also put together a single season above 4.4 WAR, and it sounds a lot better.

    Give Reed his due for the Jays, he was really good for that period of time – it isn’t like he just became useful in 2011. Reed Johnson was pretty much always useful, and the article should state that. I always wondered why he only got one chance.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • His 2006 4.5 wins come largely on the merit of his outlier UZR data. I’m not convinced his true talent ever was worth 4.5 WAR in a single season, so I didn’t feel the need to emphasize it.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Cliff says:

        Would you feel the same way if he had outlier batting statistics that year?

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Well… He did… No, I don’t feel too much differently.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • antonio bananas says:

        Aren’t defensive wins erratic at times because it’s not as much of an exact science as hitting? It’s not as reliable. So if a guy has like: -0.3, -0.1, 0.1, 1.1, 0.2, you assume the 1.1 is a screw up with the defensive metrics used? Or am I going about it wrong?

        What I’m trying to say is, I always thought that it wasn’t so much an “outlier” but more just a flaw in the measurement. 15HR, 12HR, 35HR, 10HR, the 35 is an outlier, but with defense it’s more like if I wrote 15HR, 12HR, ZYHR, 10HR, a flaw.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Oasis says:

        It’s funny. When a high fielding component inflates the value of a sabr-darling like Gardner, Pedrioa or Zobrist, you sing their praises to the mountains. But Johnson’s is inflated or an outlier …

        Vote -1 Vote +1

  2. Husker says:

    Does a player have to be a Caucasian to be “scrappy”? I have seen many Carribean and American black players who are pretty scrappish.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Jimmy the Greek says:

      The Carribeans can be scrappy only in a boxing ring. The blacks are never scrappy.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

      • B N says:

        I thought only Scoobie’s nephew was Scrappy.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • antonio bananas says:

        The white guys can’t be very fit either. Gotta be short and preferably with a scruffy junior-in-high school facial hair thing going on. Black players are athletically gifted. Carribean players are passionate. Asian players are technically sound. Don’t you know the rules?

        Vote -1 Vote +1

  3. Yirmiyahu says:

    In addition to Garza and Marshall, who you mentioned, Soto/Soriano/Dempster/Zambrano/Marmol/Byrd are all useful players who are going to be gone in a year or two anyway. If a team is willing to recognize that baseball contracts are sunk costs, they can still turn expensive contracts into prospects.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  4. werthless says:

    Wow, in 266 plate appearances last year, he had more than twice as many HBPs as walks (11 to 5). That’s hard to do.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  5. JohnnyComeLately says:

    Reed mentioned (somewhere) that his work with Cubs hitting coach Rudy Jaramillo was a part of his success last year. He apparently really liked working with him.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  6. antonio bananas says:

    Should the Cubs maybe gamble on signing guys and trading them quickly? Like sign a decent-good free agent, then trade them for prospects as soon as possible? They aren’t going to be very good, but say they sign Oswalt for a 2/18 or something, then trade him mid season, I bet they could get a decent haul for a despirate team.

    I never understood why teams wouldn’t try to trade guys with longer contracts. For example, i think that John Danks, because of the years he’s locked up, and the reasonableness of his contract, is a guy I’d trade more for now than before when he’d become a free agent. So if the Cubs were to sign a real solid workhorse like Edwin Jackson to 5/40 or whatever (just threw something out), if I’m another GM, like the Nats, I might give up more for that than a guy with 1 year remaining.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  7. This is a fair assessment of Reed Johnson. And it appears Theo & Jed are indeed going to try and prop up the 2012 Cubs with an assortment of league-average players like RJ as they continue their attempts to amass positive assets. One minor quibble/question:

    “As a 31-year-old fourth outfielder, Johnson culled together 374 outfield PAs while in a weird timeshare with Mark DeRosa, and Johnson ended the year with a nifty 1.6 WAR.”

    Shouldn’t this read “…while in a fairly sensible center field platoon with Jim Edmonds”…? I seem to recall Jim Hendry plucking both Johnson and Edmonds off the scrap heap in ’08 to create one of the most remarkably productive center field platoons in recent memory.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>