<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1999 Data!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/1999-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/1999-data/</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:42:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Appelman</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/1999-data/#comment-37165</link>
		<dc:creator>David Appelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 05:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/1999-data/#comment-37165</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure why the data hasn&#039;t been available until now, but I too guess it had to do with licensing/money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure why the data hasn&#8217;t been available until now, but I too guess it had to do with licensing/money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Seidman</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/1999-data/#comment-37147</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/1999-data/#comment-37147</guid>
		<description>David,

We get many questions here regarding the 1999 data and the &quot;controversy.&quot;  Would you be able to shed some light?  I honestly was not aware why the data wasn&#039;t available but figured it had to do with some type of licensing fee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>We get many questions here regarding the 1999 data and the &#8220;controversy.&#8221;  Would you be able to shed some light?  I honestly was not aware why the data wasn&#8217;t available but figured it had to do with some type of licensing fee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

