<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 MLB Trade Value: #50-#46</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/2009-mlb-trade-value-50-46/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/2009-mlb-trade-value-50-46/</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:01:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/2009-mlb-trade-value-50-46/#comment-104008</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=6612#comment-104008</guid>
		<description>prince fielder put up pujols- esque numbers and is 25 years old, played every game this year and still has 2 years under team control.  His defense has improved to an adequate point as well.. he has no business being this low, he should be no lower than twenty, probably in the top ten</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>prince fielder put up pujols- esque numbers and is 25 years old, played every game this year and still has 2 years under team control.  His defense has improved to an adequate point as well.. he has no business being this low, he should be no lower than twenty, probably in the top ten</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/2009-mlb-trade-value-50-46/#comment-91274</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 22:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=6612#comment-91274</guid>
		<description>waivers don&#039;t work the way you seemingly think they work...there was no chance the Yankees could have lost either player</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>waivers don&#8217;t work the way you seemingly think they work&#8230;there was no chance the Yankees could have lost either player</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/2009-mlb-trade-value-50-46/#comment-90010</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 23:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=6612#comment-90010</guid>
		<description>Well, apparently Cano has cleared waivers, as well as Melancon (click my name).  Words can&#039;t express how mind-boggling this is.  

Less than $2M for the remainder of this year, and $19M for 2010-2011, for a $15-20M player???  Do you have any explanation for this?  Are things that bad financially for EVERY team in baseball?  

And Melancon is even more perplexing.  Top prospect, great minor league numbers, making the league minimum.

I can only assume the Post is wrong.  Any thoughts, anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, apparently Cano has cleared waivers, as well as Melancon (click my name).  Words can&#8217;t express how mind-boggling this is.  </p>
<p>Less than $2M for the remainder of this year, and $19M for 2010-2011, for a $15-20M player???  Do you have any explanation for this?  Are things that bad financially for EVERY team in baseball?  </p>
<p>And Melancon is even more perplexing.  Top prospect, great minor league numbers, making the league minimum.</p>
<p>I can only assume the Post is wrong.  Any thoughts, anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe S.</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/2009-mlb-trade-value-50-46/#comment-85684</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=6612#comment-85684</guid>
		<description>Cole Hamels should not be on this list. To much risk, there are at least 30 MLB pitchers I would put before Hamels. I think J. Upton #1, Longoria #2, Lincecum #3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cole Hamels should not be on this list. To much risk, there are at least 30 MLB pitchers I would put before Hamels. I think J. Upton #1, Longoria #2, Lincecum #3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RollingWave</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/2009-mlb-trade-value-50-46/#comment-85615</link>
		<dc:creator>RollingWave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=6612#comment-85615</guid>
		<description>being the brother of Jeff Weaver is naturally unhealthy when it comes to baseball</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>being the brother of Jeff Weaver is naturally unhealthy when it comes to baseball</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhDBrian</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/2009-mlb-trade-value-50-46/#comment-85300</link>
		<dc:creator>PhDBrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 04:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=6612#comment-85300</guid>
		<description>David Wells certainly had a short career.  As did the Babe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Wells certainly had a short career.  As did the Babe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/2009-mlb-trade-value-50-46/#comment-85204</link>
		<dc:creator>B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=6612#comment-85204</guid>
		<description>If you think there&#039;s an obvious choice, I think you haven&#039;t put enough thought into the subject.  Longoria has a good case, but he&#039;s not the only one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think there&#8217;s an obvious choice, I think you haven&#8217;t put enough thought into the subject.  Longoria has a good case, but he&#8217;s not the only one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alskor</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/2009-mlb-trade-value-50-46/#comment-85196</link>
		<dc:creator>alskor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=6612#comment-85196</guid>
		<description>Longoria all the way</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Longoria all the way</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alskor</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/2009-mlb-trade-value-50-46/#comment-85195</link>
		<dc:creator>alskor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=6612#comment-85195</guid>
		<description>99% of the time... but I wouldnt say &quot;always.&quot; 

Some guys sign very team favorable contracts and are elite talents - ie. Pedroia, Longoria, Lester, Hanley, Granderson, Sizemore...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>99% of the time&#8230; but I wouldnt say &#8220;always.&#8221; </p>
<p>Some guys sign very team favorable contracts and are elite talents &#8211; ie. Pedroia, Longoria, Lester, Hanley, Granderson, Sizemore&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benne</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/2009-mlb-trade-value-50-46/#comment-85194</link>
		<dc:creator>Benne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=6612#comment-85194</guid>
		<description>Evan Longoria should be the obvious choice at #1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evan Longoria should be the obvious choice at #1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

