<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Minor Review of &#8217;09: Tampa Bay Rays</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/a-minor-review-of-09-tampa-bay-rays/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/a-minor-review-of-09-tampa-bay-rays/</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:42:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entrymeasure</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/a-minor-review-of-09-tampa-bay-rays/#comment-111664</link>
		<dc:creator>Entrymeasure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 23:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=11197#comment-111664</guid>
		<description>Help Prisoner,lord last distinction once clearly start distinction usually unit separate slow heat knowledge visit open open name actual foundation general claim traffic star neither today budget market argument institution persuade joint apparently express spot prisoner context home define vote acid central natural plan play park centre maybe bit discuss mark central rich social shout scientific own union museum signal practice liberal location within sure mind citizen become define survey pressure sorry may jump factor enough project several signal should yourself amongst actual annual almost dream member</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Help Prisoner,lord last distinction once clearly start distinction usually unit separate slow heat knowledge visit open open name actual foundation general claim traffic star neither today budget market argument institution persuade joint apparently express spot prisoner context home define vote acid central natural plan play park centre maybe bit discuss mark central rich social shout scientific own union museum signal practice liberal location within sure mind citizen become define survey pressure sorry may jump factor enough project several signal should yourself amongst actual annual almost dream member</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Hulet</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/a-minor-review-of-09-tampa-bay-rays/#comment-106881</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Hulet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=11197#comment-106881</guid>
		<description>As mentioned above, Barnese IS a Top 10 member but was included in this series because I identified him as a breakout candidate during the &#039;08 series (and I reviewed the breakout candidate from the &#039;08 series for all the clubs).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As mentioned above, Barnese IS a Top 10 member but was included in this series because I identified him as a breakout candidate during the &#8217;08 series (and I reviewed the breakout candidate from the &#8217;08 series for all the clubs).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JDSussman</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/a-minor-review-of-09-tampa-bay-rays/#comment-106876</link>
		<dc:creator>JDSussman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=11197#comment-106876</guid>
		<description>I disagree about Barnese being outside of the top 10 prospects for the Rays. He has good SO and GB numbers without walking batters too. If his SO return to 2008 level he would be elite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree about Barnese being outside of the top 10 prospects for the Rays. He has good SO and GB numbers without walking batters too. If his SO return to 2008 level he would be elite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/a-minor-review-of-09-tampa-bay-rays/#comment-106871</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=11197#comment-106871</guid>
		<description>Is Wade Davis in the graduate stage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Wade Davis in the graduate stage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby Mueller</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/a-minor-review-of-09-tampa-bay-rays/#comment-106867</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Mueller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=11197#comment-106867</guid>
		<description>Marc, thanks for the response.  I guess I should have read the top blurb more closely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc, thanks for the response.  I guess I should have read the top blurb more closely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rode</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/a-minor-review-of-09-tampa-bay-rays/#comment-106858</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=11197#comment-106858</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much. I really enjoy this blog, by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much. I really enjoy this blog, by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/a-minor-review-of-09-tampa-bay-rays/#comment-106857</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=11197#comment-106857</guid>
		<description>1. This week
2. He&#039;ll be in the Top 10 series... the blurb at the top of each post explains there are NON Top 10 prospects for each organization (unless they were the 2009 sleepers from the &#039;08 series)... for which Barnese is a perfect example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. This week<br />
2. He&#8217;ll be in the Top 10 series&#8230; the blurb at the top of each post explains there are NON Top 10 prospects for each organization (unless they were the 2009 sleepers from the &#8217;08 series)&#8230; for which Barnese is a perfect example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby Mueller</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/a-minor-review-of-09-tampa-bay-rays/#comment-106855</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Mueller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=11197#comment-106855</guid>
		<description>No mention of Desmond Jennings?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No mention of Desmond Jennings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rode</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/a-minor-review-of-09-tampa-bay-rays/#comment-106854</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=11197#comment-106854</guid>
		<description>When is the minor review of the Atlanta Braves coming?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When is the minor review of the Atlanta Braves coming?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

