Comments on: A Minor Review of 2009: Texas Rangers

By: Terry from Wahl Hair Clippers

Terry from Wahl Hair Clippers — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 12:22:14 +0000

Do you guys get to keep the products after the review? I heard you did – lucky buggers :) Thanks for the review.

By: Marc

Marc — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:15:36 +0000

I’m certainly not trying to suggest Hunter has a higher ceiling… I highlighted him as opposed to Holland because the latter has received more of the attention.

By: Adam

Adam — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:53:20 +0000

Hunter can be a very solid innings eater #4 whereas Holland can be a very good #2. But there is still a chance Hunter could get better as he just starter throwing his change and cutter this year.

By: Nate

Nate — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:17:43 +0000

Question: Joe who is more deserving of love Hunter or Holland?

Joe: Well that is very hard to answer. But I think who is more deserving of love is hard to define. You have to look at what you consider a lovable pitcher: Wins, IP, and beating Boston. But Hunter has actually been the most consistent this year. But if Holland was able to concetrate he might be able to gain consistency. But I don’t see them play every day so I can’t say who is more deserving of love.

By: Joe R

Joe R — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:44:42 +0000

Fellow rookie Derek Holland gets a lot of love, but Hunter has actually been more consistent (as “consistent” as rookie pitchers can be) this season.

…Joe Morgan?