<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Age Matters &#8230; Sometimes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/age-matters-sometimes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/age-matters-sometimes/</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:56:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: B</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/age-matters-sometimes/#comment-101047</link>
		<dc:creator>B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=9922#comment-101047</guid>
		<description>I think age is, and should be, very relevant.  Not directly in terms of what we expect out of them in the future, but rather because it&#039;s much more rare/difficult to accomplish a great season as a 20 year old than as a 26 year old.  There are plenty of good 26 year old pitchers/hitters in baseball, it&#039;s really not that impressive, all it really means is you&#039;re on a different schedule than your peers and they aren&#039;t rookies while you are.  A younger guy, on the other hand, is putting up those stats while his peers are in college, or in the low minors and has no peers who are capable of what he accomplished, and that&#039;s impressive.  Of course, indirectly this has a lot to do with how a players future projects, but the logic behind it doesn&#039;t really have anything to do with that aspect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think age is, and should be, very relevant.  Not directly in terms of what we expect out of them in the future, but rather because it&#8217;s much more rare/difficult to accomplish a great season as a 20 year old than as a 26 year old.  There are plenty of good 26 year old pitchers/hitters in baseball, it&#8217;s really not that impressive, all it really means is you&#8217;re on a different schedule than your peers and they aren&#8217;t rookies while you are.  A younger guy, on the other hand, is putting up those stats while his peers are in college, or in the low minors and has no peers who are capable of what he accomplished, and that&#8217;s impressive.  Of course, indirectly this has a lot to do with how a players future projects, but the logic behind it doesn&#8217;t really have anything to do with that aspect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/age-matters-sometimes/#comment-101046</link>
		<dc:creator>B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=9922#comment-101046</guid>
		<description>Well as long as we&#039;re on the A&#039;s theme - Ben Grieve anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well as long as we&#8217;re on the A&#8217;s theme &#8211; Ben Grieve anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ancient Mariner</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/age-matters-sometimes/#comment-101031</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ancient Mariner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=9922#comment-101031</guid>
		<description>Well, since it&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Rookie&lt;/i&gt; of the Year, not &lt;i&gt;Prospect&lt;/i&gt; of the Year, I think age is irrelevant; it&#039;s which rookie had the best season, nothing more, imho.

And put me down for Anderson, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, since it&#8217;s <i>Rookie</i> of the Year, not <i>Prospect</i> of the Year, I think age is irrelevant; it&#8217;s which rookie had the best season, nothing more, imho.</p>
<p>And put me down for Anderson, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pinball1973</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/age-matters-sometimes/#comment-101006</link>
		<dc:creator>Pinball1973</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 11:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=9922#comment-101006</guid>
		<description>So Jackie Robinson would&#039;ve needed to have &quot;no rookie close to him&quot; when he won the first ROY award at, what? 27? 28?  He was an &quot;established&quot; Negro League player with its top team, after all....

  Yep!  That&#039;s me showing you no respect for your heard-it-a-thousand-times-but-it-never-gets-any-smarter post by p-ssing on your Crocs! and that silly little Chihuahua you call an opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Jackie Robinson would&#8217;ve needed to have &#8220;no rookie close to him&#8221; when he won the first ROY award at, what? 27? 28?  He was an &#8220;established&#8221; Negro League player with its top team, after all&#8230;.</p>
<p>  Yep!  That&#8217;s me showing you no respect for your heard-it-a-thousand-times-but-it-never-gets-any-smarter post by p-ssing on your Crocs! and that silly little Chihuahua you call an opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/age-matters-sometimes/#comment-100991</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=9922#comment-100991</guid>
		<description>I never thought of it, but this article is right, voters probably do take the brightness of a player&#039;s future into account in ROY balloting, at least a little bit. No one wants to get Listached.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never thought of it, but this article is right, voters probably do take the brightness of a player&#8217;s future into account in ROY balloting, at least a little bit. No one wants to get Listached.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/age-matters-sometimes/#comment-100980</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 03:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=9922#comment-100980</guid>
		<description>gordon beckham has to be considered...in some way or another.  fast tracked to the majors and performed almost immediately.  had a rather low .294 babip, as well.  

even if he doesn&#039;t come within the top four in voting, i&#039;d bet beckham &amp; anderson have the best careers of the bunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gordon beckham has to be considered&#8230;in some way or another.  fast tracked to the majors and performed almost immediately.  had a rather low .294 babip, as well.  </p>
<p>even if he doesn&#8217;t come within the top four in voting, i&#8217;d bet beckham &amp; anderson have the best careers of the bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vivaelpujols</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/age-matters-sometimes/#comment-100979</link>
		<dc:creator>vivaelpujols</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 03:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=9922#comment-100979</guid>
		<description>Holy crap 3.68 tRA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy crap 3.68 tRA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scatterbrian</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/age-matters-sometimes/#comment-100972</link>
		<dc:creator>scatterbrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 02:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=9922#comment-100972</guid>
		<description>Player C is Brett Anderson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Player C is Brett Anderson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/age-matters-sometimes/#comment-100970</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 02:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=9922#comment-100970</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if Anderson won it. I don&#039;t think Porcello really is in the hunt. It&#039;ll either be Anderson, Andrus, or Bailey in my opinion (at the very least, that&#039;s my top 3, probably in that order).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if Anderson won it. I don&#8217;t think Porcello really is in the hunt. It&#8217;ll either be Anderson, Andrus, or Bailey in my opinion (at the very least, that&#8217;s my top 3, probably in that order).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BX</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/age-matters-sometimes/#comment-100960</link>
		<dc:creator>BX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 01:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=9922#comment-100960</guid>
		<description>Bobby Crosby has to be in the mix for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bobby Crosby has to be in the mix for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
