<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ALCS Coverage: The Braindead Headset</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/alcs-coverage-the-braindead-headset/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/alcs-coverage-the-braindead-headset/</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:42:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Gonzalez</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/alcs-coverage-the-braindead-headset/#comment-107113</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Gonzalez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=10584#comment-107113</guid>
		<description>Hi Carson,

This is a well written article. I think you are right in saying that many people often announce things as fact, when in realty they are just the announcers&#039; opinion. Good job man!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Carson,</p>
<p>This is a well written article. I think you are right in saying that many people often announce things as fact, when in realty they are just the announcers&#8217; opinion. Good job man!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seideberg</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/alcs-coverage-the-braindead-headset/#comment-105509</link>
		<dc:creator>Seideberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=10584#comment-105509</guid>
		<description>What is this newfangled &quot;OPS&quot; statistic of which Tim McCarver speaks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is this newfangled &#8220;OPS&#8221; statistic of which Tim McCarver speaks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/alcs-coverage-the-braindead-headset/#comment-103566</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 07:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=10584#comment-103566</guid>
		<description>Bill James is not a &#039;modern day philosopher.&#039; Sorry, he&#039;s just not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill James is not a &#8216;modern day philosopher.&#8217; Sorry, he&#8217;s just not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin S.</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/alcs-coverage-the-braindead-headset/#comment-103532</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=10584#comment-103532</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t they just have Miller and Morgan do it?  Pick your poison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t they just have Miller and Morgan do it?  Pick your poison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: divakar</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/alcs-coverage-the-braindead-headset/#comment-103531</link>
		<dc:creator>divakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=10584#comment-103531</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m willing to go down this line of reasoning - I certainly don&#039;t know what creates reverse splits... I find it quite interesting.

Hamels changeup was not as good as it has been previously, but his wCH was still quite high and it was definitely his best pitch. His reverse split definitely was smaller, correlating his decreased wCH... To me, however, Hamels just wasn&#039;t the same pitcher this year as before, with his wFB clearly a problem and his wCB negative as well. Hamels FIP was identical to last year, so I think we&#039;ll have to wait and see if his reverse split returns next year. Maybe he&#039;s just a different pitcher now, who is still quite effective.

In the case of Johan - his reverse split was even more pronounced this year despite having his worst wCH ever. Does that mean anything? I&#039;m not able to pull up which pitches were thrown to which batters, but it if his changeup is the reason for his reverse split, you&#039;d expect that his reverse split would decrease when the changeup isn&#039;t as good. Yet the exact opposite happened.

And Lilly doesn&#039;t throw a cutter from what I know. He throws a slider and change, but i didn&#039;t think he threw a cutter - certainly nothing like Rivera&#039;s. Where are his cutter stats? I can&#039;t find them.

Finally, CC Sabathia had the best wCH of any left-hander in baseball and showed a dramatic non-reverse split. Maybe he doesn&#039;t throw it to righties, and maybe he should - but again, I can&#039;t find that data.

I realize all of this is pretty shoddy &quot;research&quot; - I just don&#039;t see how we can determine that throwing &quot;changeups to righties&quot; results in a reverse split for the guys we&#039;re discussing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m willing to go down this line of reasoning &#8211; I certainly don&#8217;t know what creates reverse splits&#8230; I find it quite interesting.</p>
<p>Hamels changeup was not as good as it has been previously, but his wCH was still quite high and it was definitely his best pitch. His reverse split definitely was smaller, correlating his decreased wCH&#8230; To me, however, Hamels just wasn&#8217;t the same pitcher this year as before, with his wFB clearly a problem and his wCB negative as well. Hamels FIP was identical to last year, so I think we&#8217;ll have to wait and see if his reverse split returns next year. Maybe he&#8217;s just a different pitcher now, who is still quite effective.</p>
<p>In the case of Johan &#8211; his reverse split was even more pronounced this year despite having his worst wCH ever. Does that mean anything? I&#8217;m not able to pull up which pitches were thrown to which batters, but it if his changeup is the reason for his reverse split, you&#8217;d expect that his reverse split would decrease when the changeup isn&#8217;t as good. Yet the exact opposite happened.</p>
<p>And Lilly doesn&#8217;t throw a cutter from what I know. He throws a slider and change, but i didn&#8217;t think he threw a cutter &#8211; certainly nothing like Rivera&#8217;s. Where are his cutter stats? I can&#8217;t find them.</p>
<p>Finally, CC Sabathia had the best wCH of any left-hander in baseball and showed a dramatic non-reverse split. Maybe he doesn&#8217;t throw it to righties, and maybe he should &#8211; but again, I can&#8217;t find that data.</p>
<p>I realize all of this is pretty shoddy &#8220;research&#8221; &#8211; I just don&#8217;t see how we can determine that throwing &#8220;changeups to righties&#8221; results in a reverse split for the guys we&#8217;re discussing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/alcs-coverage-the-braindead-headset/#comment-103502</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=10584#comment-103502</guid>
		<description>Great point, I particularly like how you connect it to the larger phenomenon that exists in our culture.  

The fox broadcast is a considerable step down from most of the local broadcasts I&#039;ve seen on directv mlb ticket (imo).  I&#039;ve been muting it most of the time - but could also turn on AM radio to listen.  Anyone like the ESPN radio broadcast, or is that lame too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point, I particularly like how you connect it to the larger phenomenon that exists in our culture.  </p>
<p>The fox broadcast is a considerable step down from most of the local broadcasts I&#8217;ve seen on directv mlb ticket (imo).  I&#8217;ve been muting it most of the time &#8211; but could also turn on AM radio to listen.  Anyone like the ESPN radio broadcast, or is that lame too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan woytek</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/alcs-coverage-the-braindead-headset/#comment-103466</link>
		<dc:creator>dan woytek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=10584#comment-103466</guid>
		<description>Best fans in baseball!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best fans in baseball!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex JN</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/alcs-coverage-the-braindead-headset/#comment-103420</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex JN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=10584#comment-103420</guid>
		<description>This was a very good article that, though it could have perhaps chosen a better example, highlighted a phenomenon that is undoubtedly common - announcers constantly state theses that are extremely uncertain as though they were truth.  Carson&#039;s proposed solution of asking things as a question (or at least inserting appropriate uncertainty) is a concrete step broadcasters could take to make broadcasts far more palatable to the reasoning fan.  There is no reason McCarver should even state with certainty that this is sometimes true, although the sometimes does make the statement more acceptable, and there are &quot;worse&quot; examples.

Although I think everyone agrees that the broadcasters on some level are doing this because this is the sort of commentary fans prefer, we, as fans, have every right to criticize and make our voices heard and perhaps, at some stage, shift the balance (in favor of reason instead of certainty and faux-expertise) of what announcers are selected for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a very good article that, though it could have perhaps chosen a better example, highlighted a phenomenon that is undoubtedly common &#8211; announcers constantly state theses that are extremely uncertain as though they were truth.  Carson&#8217;s proposed solution of asking things as a question (or at least inserting appropriate uncertainty) is a concrete step broadcasters could take to make broadcasts far more palatable to the reasoning fan.  There is no reason McCarver should even state with certainty that this is sometimes true, although the sometimes does make the statement more acceptable, and there are &#8220;worse&#8221; examples.</p>
<p>Although I think everyone agrees that the broadcasters on some level are doing this because this is the sort of commentary fans prefer, we, as fans, have every right to criticize and make our voices heard and perhaps, at some stage, shift the balance (in favor of reason instead of certainty and faux-expertise) of what announcers are selected for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/alcs-coverage-the-braindead-headset/#comment-103414</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=10584#comment-103414</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Carson is an excellent writer, but I think the haters have point.  I agree with Carson&#039;s broader point, but the McCarver example is a poor one.  McCarver prefaced his comment with &quot;Sometimes&quot;.  I&#039;m sure at some point in the history of baseball, a lefty was thrown off balance by a lefty in a lineup full of right handers.  McCarver has been around baseball his whole life.  It is reasonable to believe that he has known of a pitcher that had this happen to him.  I see no reason to doubt that McCarver made an accurate statement.  Good point Carson, but bad example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Carson is an excellent writer, but I think the haters have point.  I agree with Carson&#8217;s broader point, but the McCarver example is a poor one.  McCarver prefaced his comment with &#8220;Sometimes&#8221;.  I&#8217;m sure at some point in the history of baseball, a lefty was thrown off balance by a lefty in a lineup full of right handers.  McCarver has been around baseball his whole life.  It is reasonable to believe that he has known of a pitcher that had this happen to him.  I see no reason to doubt that McCarver made an accurate statement.  Good point Carson, but bad example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cardsfan</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/alcs-coverage-the-braindead-headset/#comment-103403</link>
		<dc:creator>cardsfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 06:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=10584#comment-103403</guid>
		<description>Idiotic article - complete waste of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Idiotic article &#8211; complete waste of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

