FanGraphs Logo

Carl Pavano’s Second Act

A year and a half ago, Carl Pavano was baseball’s biggest punch line. Formerly a prized Red Sox prospect, Pavano was traded to Montreal in 1997 as part of a package for Pedro Martinez. He overcame early arm troubles that DL’d him three times from 1999 to 2001 to establish himself with the Marlins, whom he was traded to in July of 2002. Topping 200 innings in both 2003 and 2004, Pavano averaged 5.78 K/9, 2.08 BB/9, a 4.03 xFIP and 3.9 WAR a season. After the ’04 campaign, the Yankees came to terms with Pavano on a four-year, $39.95 million deal that will live in infamy.

Shoulder tendinitis. Bruised buttocks. Fractured ribs, suffered in a car accident and allegedly hidden from the club for a time. Tommy John surgery. Pavano threw all of 145.2 innings for the Bombers, contributing just 1.1 WAR while drawing the ire of fans and becoming tabloid fodder. When Pavano signed a one-year, $1.5 million deal with the Indians in January of 2009, with $5.3 million in performance bonuses, most snickered and wondered if he’d strain something while putting his John Hancock on the contract.

In Cleveland, something peculiar occurred: Pavano pitched as if the preceding four years never happened, morphing back into the strike-throwing machine who earned praise with the Marlins. His ERA with the Tribe (5.37) was ugly, but his xFIP (3.94) suggested he was performing as well as ever. Pavano continued his revival in Minnesota (3.99 xFIP) following an August trade. Overall, he had 6.64 K/9, 1.76 BB/9 and 3.7 WAR in 199.1 innings, with a big discrepancy between his ERA (5.10) and xFIP (3.96) due to a .335 batting average on balls in play and a low rate of stranding base runners (66.1 percent).

Pavano accepted arbitration this past off-season, and he’s earning $7 million in 2010. He’s well on his way to justifying that salary — with 1.5 WAR in 96.1 frames, the mustachioed 34-year-old has provided the Twins with about $6 million in value already. Pavano’s not missing as many bats this season (5.14 K/9), but he’s being even stingier with the walks (1.31 BB/9) and has increased his ground ball rate slightly (45.9% this year, 43.4% in ’09). His xFIP (4.03) is essentially the same as last season, though his ERA (3.64) is dramatically lower thanks to a .267 BABIP and a 73.4 percent strand rate.

Utilizing an 89-90 MPH fastball, a low-80′s slider and a low-80′s changeup, Pavano gets ahead in the count like few others — his first pitch strike percentage was 67.7 last year, and comes in at 66.2 percent in 2010 (the MLB average is about 58 percent). Among qualified MLB starters, only Cliff Lee, Carlos Silva, Roy Oswalt and Roy Halladay have a higher F-Strike% this season.

And, hitters have a tough time laying off his stuff off the plate. Pavano garnered swings on pitches outside of the strike zone 32.3 percent in 2009 (25.1 percent MLB average) and 36.4 percent this season (28.3 percent MLB average). The 2010 mark is tops among big league starters.

If Pavano reaches his modest rest-of-season ZiPS projection (a 4.30 FIP in just 77 innings), he would finish the year with around 2.5 WAR and would end up being a bargain for the Twins. Should he approach last year’s innings total with a FIP closer to his current level, he would again top the three win mark. After years of DL stints and derision from fans and analysts, Pavano is back to being a quality rotation cog on a playoff-caliber team.



Print This Post

A recent graduate of Duquesne University, David Golebiewski is a contributing writer for Fangraphs, The Pittsburgh Sports Report and Baseball Analytics. His work for Inside Edge Scouting Services has appeared on ESPN.com and Yahoo.com, and he was a fantasy baseball columnist for Rotoworld from 2009-2010. He recently contributed an article on Mike Stanton's slugging to The Hardball Times Annual 2012. Contact David at david.golebiewski@gmail.com and check out his work at Journalist For Hire.

27 Responses to “Carl Pavano’s Second Act”

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Click here to view comments in a non-threaded output.
  1. Resolution says:

    Hey, how much are wins worth again? They were around 4 mill but then they fell when the economy tanked…

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  2. Dirty Water says:

    Carl Pavano is my favorite Yankee of all time.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  3. Not David says:

    As a bonus it appears he’s going to be a Type A at the end of the season.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Lucas says:

      If that’s the case and the Twins offer arbitration, does Pavano accept again? He’d probably make, what, 9-10 million in arb? Not chump change.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Not David says:

        I doubt he accepts arb again. At his age coming off (what I assume) will end up being a pretty successful season, this might be his last good chance to get a relatively big contract (3 years, 8-10M per?).

        Vote -1 Vote +1

  4. MNTwins says:

    Also, that ‘stache is amazing! For those of you who haven’t seen it, I highly recommend digging up some recent Pavano photos. As a hitter, I think I’d be intimidated (or at least distracted) having to look at that masterful facial hair in between pitches.

    +5 Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Thomas says:

      Rollie Fingers had a sweet mustache. Rollie Fingers was good. Ergo, mustaches make you good.

      +10 Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Sal Fasano says:

      Rollie Fingers. Gosse Gossage. Jack Morris. The evidence is pretty clear and there really isn’t any debate anymore. Arguing that a mustache “doesn’t count” in baseball is just stupid – it’s like saying wins are the most important pitching stat.

      What has been less explored by the SABR community, however, is the impact of mullets. Maybe there’s a Community Research article there for the making?

      +9 Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Thomas says:

      You’re being modest. Your own facial hair was legendary.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  5. Mark says:

    vivaelpujols

    2010 Pavano w/o stache: 4-4, 4.11 ERA
    2010 Pavano w/stache: 4-2, 3.13 ERA

    Now if only Scott Baker was old enough to grow a stache…

    +8 Vote -1 Vote +1

  6. Bill Campbell says:

    There should be career moustache/non-moustache splits on every baseball stat website. It’s a known fact that Wade Bogg’s power surge in 1987 correlates with his ‘tache finally reaching down to his jaw line.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  7. Sal Fasano says:

    I think it can work the other way too — e.g., Al Holland shaved off his mutton chops and he was never the same again. Just like Samson. Except Samson didn’t do all that coke.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  8. Mark says:

    More facial hair = more weak contact. Lower LD%. Much higher IFFB%. More FB’s, less GB’s. Carl knows a first pitch popup trumps a strikeout any day of the week. A much lower BABIP is only luck if there’s no statistical reason for it.

    Plus, he’s averaging an extra 1.5 innings pitched per start since he started growning the stasche.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  9. Bill says:

    It’s possible extra face-hair improves balance, like a cat using it’s tail when it walks a fence. Fingers had AMAZING balance stepping into his throws and fielding his position. That stache was like a freakin’ tight-rope walker’s pole for him.

    Also: Cap Anson.
    http://baseballcardslive.com/wp-content/uploads/1887AllenGinterBaseballCardAdrianAnson-Front.jpg

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  10. Bobby says:

    Why does Vivaelpujols hate mustaches so much?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  11. Shoreview Twins Fan says:

    Thread of the year. Pulos does suck too.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>




Player Linker - Contact Us - Advertise - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy