<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for FanGraphs Baseball</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 12:11:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Daily Notes: A More Better Cliff Lee? by Judy</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/daily-notes-a-more-better-cliff-lee/#comment-2715288</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 12:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=87186#comment-2715288</guid>
		<description>Jinx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jinx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Daily Notes: A More Better Cliff Lee? by Sam Samson</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/daily-notes-a-more-better-cliff-lee/#comment-2715250</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Samson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 11:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=87186#comment-2715250</guid>
		<description>One who is making a deliberate grammar mistake for mild comic effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One who is making a deliberate grammar mistake for mild comic effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Daily Notes: A More Better Cliff Lee? by Sam Samson</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/daily-notes-a-more-better-cliff-lee/#comment-2715247</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Samson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 11:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=87186#comment-2715247</guid>
		<description>In liberalism? Where did you pull that one from?

Caution: This question may be a trap, as I may already know the answer, anatomically speaking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In liberalism? Where did you pull that one from?</p>
<p>Caution: This question may be a trap, as I may already know the answer, anatomically speaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Radio Broadcast Rankings: Complete Table and Notes by John</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/radio-broadcast-rankings-complete-table-and-notes/#comment-2715075</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 10:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=87110#comment-2715075</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s because Joe Buck is 8,000,000,000,000 times worse than the worst radio broadcaster,so that skews the overall #&#039;s worse than Mike Minor skews your ERA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s because Joe Buck is 8,000,000,000,000 times worse than the worst radio broadcaster,so that skews the overall #&#8217;s worse than Mike Minor skews your ERA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Start Of Adam Lind&#8217;s Ending by Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/the-start-of-adam-linds-ending/#comment-2715021</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 10:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=87138#comment-2715021</guid>
		<description>Corrections that affect the sense of a piece are good. Pointless whining about grammar or absolute nittery about things nobody cares about are not. This clearly falls into the first category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corrections that affect the sense of a piece are good. Pointless whining about grammar or absolute nittery about things nobody cares about are not. This clearly falls into the first category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Daily Notes: A More Better Cliff Lee? by Wade8813</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/daily-notes-a-more-better-cliff-lee/#comment-2714677</link>
		<dc:creator>Wade8813</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 08:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=87186#comment-2714677</guid>
		<description>Would you have preferred it if he&#039;d said &quot;A more betterer&quot;? Would that have made it blatant enough for you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you have preferred it if he&#8217;d said &#8220;A more betterer&#8221;? Would that have made it blatant enough for you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Heyward, Sophomore Slumps, and Old Friends by BurleighGrimes</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/heyward-sophomore-slumps-and-old-friends/#comment-2714575</link>
		<dc:creator>BurleighGrimes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 07:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=87107#comment-2714575</guid>
		<description>I ordinarily like Matt&#039;s writing but I don&#039;t think I understand what the argument here is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ordinarily like Matt&#8217;s writing but I don&#8217;t think I understand what the argument here is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Daily Notes: Seriously, the Cardinals Offense by Kris</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/daily-notes-seriously-the-cardinals-offense/#comment-2714396</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 06:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=87167#comment-2714396</guid>
		<description>So the Cards have beaten up on poor teams in the NL Central and have been swept by Atlanta (at home no less) and LA recently.  I&#039;m not saying the Cards don&#039;t have a good line-up, but to read Fangraphs you would think they are the second coming of the &#039;27 Yankees.  There has been virtually nothing written about the offensive production of Atlanta, who I think has been more impressive and more likely to sustain the offensive output over the year.

Let&#039;s take a look at the WAR and wRC+ contribution of Atlanta&#039;s offense.

Bourne 2.3 WAR, wRC +126
Prado 2.2 WAR, wRC +148
Freeman 1.0 WAR, wRC +122
McCann 1.0 WAR wRC +114
Uggla 1.2 WAR, wRC +116
Jones 1.1 WAR, wRC +139
Heyward 1.3 WAR, wRC +121
Pastornicky -0.5 WAR, wRC +86

Atlanta&#039;s offensive production has been mighty impressive especially when you consider their schedule and the fact that their line-up isn&#039;t filled with a bunch of guys performing way beyond their career line&#039;s.  So, why all the love for the Cards Fangraphs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the Cards have beaten up on poor teams in the NL Central and have been swept by Atlanta (at home no less) and LA recently.  I&#8217;m not saying the Cards don&#8217;t have a good line-up, but to read Fangraphs you would think they are the second coming of the &#8217;27 Yankees.  There has been virtually nothing written about the offensive production of Atlanta, who I think has been more impressive and more likely to sustain the offensive output over the year.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s take a look at the WAR and wRC+ contribution of Atlanta&#8217;s offense.</p>
<p>Bourne 2.3 WAR, wRC +126<br />
Prado 2.2 WAR, wRC +148<br />
Freeman 1.0 WAR, wRC +122<br />
McCann 1.0 WAR wRC +114<br />
Uggla 1.2 WAR, wRC +116<br />
Jones 1.1 WAR, wRC +139<br />
Heyward 1.3 WAR, wRC +121<br />
Pastornicky -0.5 WAR, wRC +86</p>
<p>Atlanta&#8217;s offensive production has been mighty impressive especially when you consider their schedule and the fact that their line-up isn&#8217;t filled with a bunch of guys performing way beyond their career line&#8217;s.  So, why all the love for the Cards Fangraphs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Start Of Adam Lind&#8217;s Ending by Brian the fist</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/the-start-of-adam-linds-ending/#comment-2714312</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian the fist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 05:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=87138#comment-2714312</guid>
		<description>This is not true.  Jose is not a good fielder.  I know this because I watch every game.  Same reason I know rasmus has been hitting better than his slash line.  Jose will end up at first as soon as gose is ready for everyday action</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not true.  Jose is not a good fielder.  I know this because I watch every game.  Same reason I know rasmus has been hitting better than his slash line.  Jose will end up at first as soon as gose is ready for everyday action</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FanGraphs Audio: John Jaso and Geoff Baker by Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/fangraphs-audio-john-jaso-and-geoff-baker/#comment-2714133</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 04:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=87159#comment-2714133</guid>
		<description>Geoff Baker&#039;s agenda is getting hits on his blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoff Baker&#8217;s agenda is getting hits on his blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

