<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David Wright&#8217;s Power Outage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/david-wrights-power-outage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/david-wrights-power-outage/</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:03:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimbo</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/david-wrights-power-outage/#comment-108498</link>
		<dc:creator>jimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=11537#comment-108498</guid>
		<description>Thanks Tim. That makes a lot of sense, and is ample rationale to drop him at the very least behind Zimmerman. 

Why in the world would they build a park MORE cavernous than Shea? (For that matter, I don&#039;t see why teams don&#039;t adjust the fences season by season to match their team composition...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Tim. That makes a lot of sense, and is ample rationale to drop him at the very least behind Zimmerman. </p>
<p>Why in the world would they build a park MORE cavernous than Shea? (For that matter, I don&#8217;t see why teams don&#8217;t adjust the fences season by season to match their team composition&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Batman</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/david-wrights-power-outage/#comment-108478</link>
		<dc:creator>Batman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=11537#comment-108478</guid>
		<description>&quot;The answer is obvious: He’s lying about his age. He must be at least 33.&quot;

That&#039;s the ticket - his real name is &quot;David Sí.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The answer is obvious: He’s lying about his age. He must be at least 33.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the ticket &#8211; his real name is &#8220;David Sí.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim L.</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/david-wrights-power-outage/#comment-108467</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=11537#comment-108467</guid>
		<description>I think at 8th overall, depending on what your league settings are is going to overvalue Wright. Draft him 8th at your own peril.

Unless he continues to develop more power (not out of the realm of possibility at his age), or plays somewhere else, his 30 HR days are probably over. His track record from 2007-2008 shows that a significant amount of his homeruns barely clear the wall. His home park plays 25-30 feet farther back than previously.  That is a significant drag on the power. 

Look at Wright&#039;s 2nd half of 2008 for his downside risk. It&#039;s considerable. If he corrects his approach, he&#039;ll be a .300 hitter, and a 15-20+ HR guy with 25+ SB for a few more years. There is significant value in that. But his downside risk is greater than it was. Bearing that in mind, I have him ranked as the fifth best 3rd baseman behind ARod, Longoria, Zimmerman, and Reynolds. Of course your league&#039;s scoring system can affect that as well. In my &quot;experts only&quot; (self proclaimed) dynasty league (which has 12 offensive categories, and as such downplays the SB factor) Wright probably ranks behind Sandoval and possibly even Michael Young (depending on whether you are competing for the title this next year or not).

In a yearly league, I probably don&#039;t draft Wright in in the first 3-4 rounds. In an auction league, I let someone else bid full value for him. It&#039;s all about value, and he&#039;s not a good value right now, unless you draft him later or pay a bargain price for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think at 8th overall, depending on what your league settings are is going to overvalue Wright. Draft him 8th at your own peril.</p>
<p>Unless he continues to develop more power (not out of the realm of possibility at his age), or plays somewhere else, his 30 HR days are probably over. His track record from 2007-2008 shows that a significant amount of his homeruns barely clear the wall. His home park plays 25-30 feet farther back than previously.  That is a significant drag on the power. </p>
<p>Look at Wright&#8217;s 2nd half of 2008 for his downside risk. It&#8217;s considerable. If he corrects his approach, he&#8217;ll be a .300 hitter, and a 15-20+ HR guy with 25+ SB for a few more years. There is significant value in that. But his downside risk is greater than it was. Bearing that in mind, I have him ranked as the fifth best 3rd baseman behind ARod, Longoria, Zimmerman, and Reynolds. Of course your league&#8217;s scoring system can affect that as well. In my &#8220;experts only&#8221; (self proclaimed) dynasty league (which has 12 offensive categories, and as such downplays the SB factor) Wright probably ranks behind Sandoval and possibly even Michael Young (depending on whether you are competing for the title this next year or not).</p>
<p>In a yearly league, I probably don&#8217;t draft Wright in in the first 3-4 rounds. In an auction league, I let someone else bid full value for him. It&#8217;s all about value, and he&#8217;s not a good value right now, unless you draft him later or pay a bargain price for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim L.</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/david-wrights-power-outage/#comment-108454</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=11537#comment-108454</guid>
		<description>Actually, his contact rate was down about 7-8%...from his typical 81-82% contact rate, he was at about 74% for the year. Dave mentioned he saw something mechanical ( the shoulder hitch - though most power hitters do have some kind of &quot;loading mechanism&quot; which often involves turning their front shoulder &quot;in&quot; prior to the pitchers delivery) which may be contributing. That may very well be the case.

I think it could also be mental. Greg Rybarczyk of Hit Tracker noted that 9 of Wright&#039;s 33 HR in 2008 were either &quot;barely enough&quot; (cleared the fence by 10 feet or less) or &quot;lucky&quot; (would not have cleared the fence without the aid or wind or other conditions on a 70 degree day, and that his average HR distance was 399 feet. And accoring to Marc Normandin of ESPN prior to the 2009, the Citifield fences would play 20-30 feet farther in the power alleys and center field because of dimensions and wall height. It seems pretty easy to conclude that Wright, more than other power hitters who hit longer HR&#039;s, would be affected significantly by the home ballpark. Wright&#039;s not dumb - he can see that it takes more to hit it out. I think it is possible that Wright, as an all-star  middle of the order bat has been gearing up to hit the ball farther, wanting to live up to his past successes, and of course wanting to help his team win. The plate approach was affected, with less contact. It is also probable that increased effort to launch HR&#039;s led to the very mechanical problems that Dave alluded to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, his contact rate was down about 7-8%&#8230;from his typical 81-82% contact rate, he was at about 74% for the year. Dave mentioned he saw something mechanical ( the shoulder hitch &#8211; though most power hitters do have some kind of &#8220;loading mechanism&#8221; which often involves turning their front shoulder &#8220;in&#8221; prior to the pitchers delivery) which may be contributing. That may very well be the case.</p>
<p>I think it could also be mental. Greg Rybarczyk of Hit Tracker noted that 9 of Wright&#8217;s 33 HR in 2008 were either &#8220;barely enough&#8221; (cleared the fence by 10 feet or less) or &#8220;lucky&#8221; (would not have cleared the fence without the aid or wind or other conditions on a 70 degree day, and that his average HR distance was 399 feet. And accoring to Marc Normandin of ESPN prior to the 2009, the Citifield fences would play 20-30 feet farther in the power alleys and center field because of dimensions and wall height. It seems pretty easy to conclude that Wright, more than other power hitters who hit longer HR&#8217;s, would be affected significantly by the home ballpark. Wright&#8217;s not dumb &#8211; he can see that it takes more to hit it out. I think it is possible that Wright, as an all-star  middle of the order bat has been gearing up to hit the ball farther, wanting to live up to his past successes, and of course wanting to help his team win. The plate approach was affected, with less contact. It is also probable that increased effort to launch HR&#8217;s led to the very mechanical problems that Dave alluded to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim L.</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/david-wrights-power-outage/#comment-108438</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=11537#comment-108438</guid>
		<description>&quot;It should be a fair park for pitchers and hitters, and the Mets can use it as a selling point for both potential pitcher and hitter signings.&quot;

Huh? 

A neutral park is just that - neutral...To me, a neutral ballpark is not a selling point for either hitters or pitchers, and neither does it hurt you. If it&#039;s nuetral and you try to sell it to a hitter, the agent can respond that there is probably 10 parks that are better hitting environments. Same thing if you try to sell a nuetral park to pitcher. The Mets will sell New York, ability to spend money, etc...and park, if it is in fact neutral, won&#039;t hurt.

Not sure if its neutral anyway. Somebody earlier commented that the sample size is still small enough to not yet draw conclusions, especially given the makeup of this year&#039;s Mets and their injuries. It seems that just from the dimensions it should play much tougher in terms of hitting homeruns. We&#039;ll know more in 2 more years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It should be a fair park for pitchers and hitters, and the Mets can use it as a selling point for both potential pitcher and hitter signings.&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh? </p>
<p>A neutral park is just that &#8211; neutral&#8230;To me, a neutral ballpark is not a selling point for either hitters or pitchers, and neither does it hurt you. If it&#8217;s nuetral and you try to sell it to a hitter, the agent can respond that there is probably 10 parks that are better hitting environments. Same thing if you try to sell a nuetral park to pitcher. The Mets will sell New York, ability to spend money, etc&#8230;and park, if it is in fact neutral, won&#8217;t hurt.</p>
<p>Not sure if its neutral anyway. Somebody earlier commented that the sample size is still small enough to not yet draw conclusions, especially given the makeup of this year&#8217;s Mets and their injuries. It seems that just from the dimensions it should play much tougher in terms of hitting homeruns. We&#8217;ll know more in 2 more years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimbo</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/david-wrights-power-outage/#comment-108261</link>
		<dc:creator>jimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=11537#comment-108261</guid>
		<description>Mechanical you say? Maybe he should hook up with Ben Zobrist&#039;s hitting instructor...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mechanical you say? Maybe he should hook up with Ben Zobrist&#8217;s hitting instructor&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/david-wrights-power-outage/#comment-108260</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=11537#comment-108260</guid>
		<description>The answer is obvious: He&#039;s lying about his age.  He must be at least 33.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer is obvious: He&#8217;s lying about his age.  He must be at least 33.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/david-wrights-power-outage/#comment-108258</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=11537#comment-108258</guid>
		<description>Wright&#039;s power struggles were all mechanical, I&#039;ve looked at a lot of film, as well as watching his BP sessions throughout the year. His swing developed a hitch because he started to turn his back on the pitcher prior to delivery and never fixed this all year, up until actually the final series of the year, in which I noticed it go away some.

Citi Field was incorrectly characterized as a pitcher&#039;s park based on a 2-month sample (April/May) when balls were dying there. But through the summer, the ball flew out. It should be a fair park for pitchers and hitters, and the Mets can use it as a selling point for both potential pitcher and hitter signings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wright&#8217;s power struggles were all mechanical, I&#8217;ve looked at a lot of film, as well as watching his BP sessions throughout the year. His swing developed a hitch because he started to turn his back on the pitcher prior to delivery and never fixed this all year, up until actually the final series of the year, in which I noticed it go away some.</p>
<p>Citi Field was incorrectly characterized as a pitcher&#8217;s park based on a 2-month sample (April/May) when balls were dying there. But through the summer, the ball flew out. It should be a fair park for pitchers and hitters, and the Mets can use it as a selling point for both potential pitcher and hitter signings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Southsider</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/david-wrights-power-outage/#comment-108221</link>
		<dc:creator>Southsider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=11537#comment-108221</guid>
		<description>His contact rate was down 3%, though he wasn&#039;t fishing all that much in comparison to career marks.  Just an off year all around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His contact rate was down 3%, though he wasn&#8217;t fishing all that much in comparison to career marks.  Just an off year all around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimbo</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/david-wrights-power-outage/#comment-108217</link>
		<dc:creator>jimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=11537#comment-108217</guid>
		<description>&quot;Mostly because it seems unlikely he would see his ability to hit for power decay in such an abrupt fashion.&quot;

Lacking any other explanation, I have to think he&#039;s as likely to hit 30 as he is 10 next year. Have him ranked 8th overall right now for 2010. Might move down depending on the lineup around him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Mostly because it seems unlikely he would see his ability to hit for power decay in such an abrupt fashion.&#8221;</p>
<p>Lacking any other explanation, I have to think he&#8217;s as likely to hit 30 as he is 10 next year. Have him ranked 8th overall right now for 2010. Might move down depending on the lineup around him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

