<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Define Pretty Good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/define-pretty-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/define-pretty-good/</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:38:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe R</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/define-pretty-good/#comment-96570</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=9180#comment-96570</guid>
		<description>Albert Pujols needs to prove he can win the big one without David Eckstein.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Albert Pujols needs to prove he can win the big one without David Eckstein.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhDBrian</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/define-pretty-good/#comment-96569</link>
		<dc:creator>PhDBrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=9180#comment-96569</guid>
		<description>I think 77 wins qualifies as pretty good in baseball. Particularly if your such a small market franchise.  Frankly, those 77 wins look very possible to me.  The rotation has a chance be better than average if Young bounces back.  The bullpen is one of the best in the game.  The defense looks like it could be league average or so.  Plus, it is unlikely the offense will be as bad next season as it was this season.   So I would say the Padres stand a solid chance to be .500 team next year with just a little bit of solid free agent help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think 77 wins qualifies as pretty good in baseball. Particularly if your such a small market franchise.  Frankly, those 77 wins look very possible to me.  The rotation has a chance be better than average if Young bounces back.  The bullpen is one of the best in the game.  The defense looks like it could be league average or so.  Plus, it is unlikely the offense will be as bad next season as it was this season.   So I would say the Padres stand a solid chance to be .500 team next year with just a little bit of solid free agent help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not David</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/define-pretty-good/#comment-96376</link>
		<dc:creator>Not David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=9180#comment-96376</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s his scrappiness that&#039;s diety-like, his clutchiness is merely &#039;pretty good.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s his scrappiness that&#8217;s diety-like, his clutchiness is merely &#8216;pretty good.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BCJ</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/define-pretty-good/#comment-96300</link>
		<dc:creator>BCJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=9180#comment-96300</guid>
		<description>Oscar Salazar is very underrated and should be a major contributor once he gets his at bats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oscar Salazar is very underrated and should be a major contributor once he gets his at bats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blackoutyears</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/define-pretty-good/#comment-96289</link>
		<dc:creator>blackoutyears</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=9180#comment-96289</guid>
		<description>Eckstein? Replacement level? You&#039;re obviously ignoring his deity-like clutchiness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eckstein? Replacement level? You&#8217;re obviously ignoring his deity-like clutchiness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis L</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/define-pretty-good/#comment-96285</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=9180#comment-96285</guid>
		<description>The Padres org is pretty high on some of the younger players, especially the pitching staff.  But I agree -- 77 wins would be what I&#039;d consider &quot;pretty good&quot; after this season.  77 wins puts us in shouting distance of 500, which is much better than I would&#039;ve guessed about 2 months ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Padres org is pretty high on some of the younger players, especially the pitching staff.  But I agree &#8212; 77 wins would be what I&#8217;d consider &#8220;pretty good&#8221; after this season.  77 wins puts us in shouting distance of 500, which is much better than I would&#8217;ve guessed about 2 months ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/define-pretty-good/#comment-96250</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=9180#comment-96250</guid>
		<description>&quot;I think Towers is a bright guy, but I don’t quite get his optimism.&quot;

What do you expect him to say?  &quot;Yeah, next year hasn&#039;t started yet, but i&#039;m pretty sure we&#039;re going to be horrible.  Don&#039;t bother buying tickets.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I think Towers is a bright guy, but I don’t quite get his optimism.&#8221;</p>
<p>What do you expect him to say?  &#8220;Yeah, next year hasn&#8217;t started yet, but i&#8217;m pretty sure we&#8217;re going to be horrible.  Don&#8217;t bother buying tickets.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/define-pretty-good/#comment-96248</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=9180#comment-96248</guid>
		<description>I hadn&#039;t realized what a HUGE effect Petco has on their offensive players. I knew Kouzmanoff was somewhere around .260/.300/.420, but then I saw your 2.7 WAR figure and had to see it for myself. Sure enough, he was around that, with a .313 wOBA, but the park adjustment added six runs to his total! So an average hitter in Petco is something like a .315 wOBA? That&#039;s pretty harsh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hadn&#8217;t realized what a HUGE effect Petco has on their offensive players. I knew Kouzmanoff was somewhere around .260/.300/.420, but then I saw your 2.7 WAR figure and had to see it for myself. Sure enough, he was around that, with a .313 wOBA, but the park adjustment added six runs to his total! So an average hitter in Petco is something like a .315 wOBA? That&#8217;s pretty harsh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

