<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Neglect the Jakester</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/dont-neglect-the-jakester/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/dont-neglect-the-jakester/</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:53:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Au</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/dont-neglect-the-jakester/#comment-38561</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Au</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 15:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/dont-neglect-the-jakester/#comment-38561</guid>
		<description>Right on, Eric. Peavy is (among) the best. 

The only reason Peavy hasn&#039;t been recognized is that San Diego hasn&#039;t done much otherwise. Even a pitcher with a 2.00 ERA won&#039;t win if his team doesn&#039;t provide run support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on, Eric. Peavy is (among) the best. </p>
<p>The only reason Peavy hasn&#8217;t been recognized is that San Diego hasn&#8217;t done much otherwise. Even a pitcher with a 2.00 ERA won&#8217;t win if his team doesn&#8217;t provide run support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hats for Bats</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/dont-neglect-the-jakester/#comment-38518</link>
		<dc:creator>Hats for Bats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 21:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/dont-neglect-the-jakester/#comment-38518</guid>
		<description>Peavy&#039;s a great pitcher, and when I ranked the top ten starters in the majors, he was number 5.

http://hats-for-bats.blogspot.com/2008/08/best-pitchers-in-major-leagues.html

But his 2.54 and 2.59 ERA&#039;s of the past couple years are just not realistic. Last year it was a 5.8% HR/FB rate, now its his LOB%. He hasn&#039;t shown an actual ability to strand runners, as his 77.6 LOB% is right on line with his overall skill and 3.46 FIP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peavy&#8217;s a great pitcher, and when I ranked the top ten starters in the majors, he was number 5.</p>
<p><a href="http://hats-for-bats.blogspot.com/2008/08/best-pitchers-in-major-leagues.html" rel="nofollow">http://hats-for-bats.blogspot.com/2008/08/best-pitchers-in-major-leagues.html</a></p>
<p>But his 2.54 and 2.59 ERA&#8217;s of the past couple years are just not realistic. Last year it was a 5.8% HR/FB rate, now its his LOB%. He hasn&#8217;t shown an actual ability to strand runners, as his 77.6 LOB% is right on line with his overall skill and 3.46 FIP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Seidman</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/dont-neglect-the-jakester/#comment-38511</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/dont-neglect-the-jakester/#comment-38511</guid>
		<description>We talked about this a week or two ago on one of Dave&#039;s posts, in that even though Peavy is, well, awesome, an 84.5% LOB is utterly ridiculous for a starter.  I think that Peavy can well sustain an LOB between 79-81 this year, which would be better than just about everyone else, but an 84.5-85% rate would be a surprise.  His BABIP may rise ever so slightly, which could lower his LOB rate ever so slightly as well; but as I mentioned, these regressions would be slight and won&#039;t truly worsen his overall numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We talked about this a week or two ago on one of Dave&#8217;s posts, in that even though Peavy is, well, awesome, an 84.5% LOB is utterly ridiculous for a starter.  I think that Peavy can well sustain an LOB between 79-81 this year, which would be better than just about everyone else, but an 84.5-85% rate would be a surprise.  His BABIP may rise ever so slightly, which could lower his LOB rate ever so slightly as well; but as I mentioned, these regressions would be slight and won&#8217;t truly worsen his overall numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scappy</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/dont-neglect-the-jakester/#comment-38510</link>
		<dc:creator>Scappy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/dont-neglect-the-jakester/#comment-38510</guid>
		<description>With a guy that has Peavy&#039;s skill pitching in the park that he does I think it is a little more likely that he can maintain the insane LOB rate he has.  In 04 he stranded 83.9% while having a BABIP of 310.  I know 310 is only a bit above average, but knock 20 points off his BABIP in 04 and he would have had an even higher LOB rate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a guy that has Peavy&#8217;s skill pitching in the park that he does I think it is a little more likely that he can maintain the insane LOB rate he has.  In 04 he stranded 83.9% while having a BABIP of 310.  I know 310 is only a bit above average, but knock 20 points off his BABIP in 04 and he would have had an even higher LOB rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

