<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Draft Reviews: Kansas City Royals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/draft-reports-kansas-city-royals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/draft-reports-kansas-city-royals/</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:30:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Austin</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/draft-reports-kansas-city-royals/#comment-75150</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 04:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=4780#comment-75150</guid>
		<description>Hochevar&#039;s ceiling wasn&#039;t as high as, say, Lincecum&#039;s, but let&#039;s not act like it was extremely low.  And he wasn&#039;t a signability guy, either.  Royals could&#039;ve taken Lincecum or Longoria with the benefit of hindsight, but at the time no one in baseball would&#039;ve done that...Lincecum&#039;s delivery still scared people, and Longoria was NOT that highly regarded at all - best bat in what was supposed to be a weak class.  Now, obviously, Royals wish they could have a do-over, but then again, so does every team 1-9 who passed on Lincecum (except maybe the Rays).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hochevar&#8217;s ceiling wasn&#8217;t as high as, say, Lincecum&#8217;s, but let&#8217;s not act like it was extremely low.  And he wasn&#8217;t a signability guy, either.  Royals could&#8217;ve taken Lincecum or Longoria with the benefit of hindsight, but at the time no one in baseball would&#8217;ve done that&#8230;Lincecum&#8217;s delivery still scared people, and Longoria was NOT that highly regarded at all &#8211; best bat in what was supposed to be a weak class.  Now, obviously, Royals wish they could have a do-over, but then again, so does every team 1-9 who passed on Lincecum (except maybe the Rays).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richie Abernathy</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/draft-reports-kansas-city-royals/#comment-75117</link>
		<dc:creator>Richie Abernathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 21:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=4780#comment-75117</guid>
		<description>might should have taken evan longoria.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>might should have taken evan longoria.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matty</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/draft-reports-kansas-city-royals/#comment-75116</link>
		<dc:creator>Matty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 20:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=4780#comment-75116</guid>
		<description>Jason Taylor was suspended 50 games for testing positive for a drug of abuse:

http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/?p=2074</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason Taylor was suspended 50 games for testing positive for a drug of abuse:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/?p=2074" rel="nofollow">http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/?p=2074</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin S.</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/draft-reports-kansas-city-royals/#comment-75100</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 19:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=4780#comment-75100</guid>
		<description>Wow, 2006 must have really been a bad year if their best pick was using the #1 overall on a signability guy with a low ceiling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, 2006 must have really been a bad year if their best pick was using the #1 overall on a signability guy with a low ceiling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KingKirkpatrick</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/draft-reports-kansas-city-royals/#comment-75097</link>
		<dc:creator>KingKirkpatrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 19:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=4780#comment-75097</guid>
		<description>Why is 3B an MLB club need? Yeah, Gordon is hurt, but he did have a 110 OPS+ last year, including a dramatic increase in walk rake/plate discipline..and he clearly has good power potential and is still only 25 years old. Not that he&#039;s going to live up to the ridiculous &quot;next George Brett&quot; hype, but I see no reason why he can&#039;t be an above average hitter for a long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is 3B an MLB club need? Yeah, Gordon is hurt, but he did have a 110 OPS+ last year, including a dramatic increase in walk rake/plate discipline..and he clearly has good power potential and is still only 25 years old. Not that he&#8217;s going to live up to the ridiculous &#8220;next George Brett&#8221; hype, but I see no reason why he can&#8217;t be an above average hitter for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
