<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fan Projection Targets &#8211; 01/06/10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/fan-projection-targets-010610/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/fan-projection-targets-010610/</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:21:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toffer Peak</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/fan-projection-targets-010610/#comment-119839</link>
		<dc:creator>Toffer Peak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 04:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14197#comment-119839</guid>
		<description>This has been explained in other comments but basically although the Fans pick most of the underlying components there are some under the hood calculations that use those inputs to extrapolate other stats. That is if the fans predict 600 PAs for a .380 wOBA leadoff hitter on a .345 wOBA team then the calcualttions may spit out a projection of 110 Runs and 80 RBIs.

Same with saves, you select what their role and innings pitched will be; that combined with their projected ERA and overall team quality should give an idea of how many saves they should get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has been explained in other comments but basically although the Fans pick most of the underlying components there are some under the hood calculations that use those inputs to extrapolate other stats. That is if the fans predict 600 PAs for a .380 wOBA leadoff hitter on a .345 wOBA team then the calcualttions may spit out a projection of 110 Runs and 80 RBIs.</p>
<p>Same with saves, you select what their role and innings pitched will be; that combined with their projected ERA and overall team quality should give an idea of how many saves they should get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crix</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/fan-projection-targets-010610/#comment-119491</link>
		<dc:creator>crix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 01:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14197#comment-119491</guid>
		<description>Brandon Webb will mos def be a top starter next year but, Dan Haren surpassed him for the ace of the staff, which could have been even better next season if they didn&#039;t give up Max Scherzer.(bad move for the future) Not to sure about Buckner yet, still a little early to tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brandon Webb will mos def be a top starter next year but, Dan Haren surpassed him for the ace of the staff, which could have been even better next season if they didn&#8217;t give up Max Scherzer.(bad move for the future) Not to sure about Buckner yet, still a little early to tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcrawford620</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/fan-projection-targets-010610/#comment-119450</link>
		<dc:creator>mcrawford620</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 22:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14197#comment-119450</guid>
		<description>Right now Billy Buckner is projected for 32 starts and 42 games...that&#039;s seems doubtful. In the rotation all year, makes virtually every start, and gets in some bullpen work a couple of times a month?

I know, it&#039;s just a formula quirk. But some of those GS projections seem weird, like projecting Dan Haren for 36 GS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right now Billy Buckner is projected for 32 starts and 42 games&#8230;that&#8217;s seems doubtful. In the rotation all year, makes virtually every start, and gets in some bullpen work a couple of times a month?</p>
<p>I know, it&#8217;s just a formula quirk. But some of those GS projections seem weird, like projecting Dan Haren for 36 GS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dprat</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/fan-projection-targets-010610/#comment-119396</link>
		<dc:creator>dprat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14197#comment-119396</guid>
		<description>Now that Derek has gotten his 15 nanoseconds of fame, my turn. May I respectfully submit that &quot;proven&quot; closers are way under-represented in the players who have crossed the 30 projection barrier. Among those not there yet: Nathan, Broxton, Bell, Marmol, Brian Wilson, Street, Jenks, Hoffman, Lidge, etc etc. Might we target a few of these? 

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that Derek has gotten his 15 nanoseconds of fame, my turn. May I respectfully submit that &#8220;proven&#8221; closers are way under-represented in the players who have crossed the 30 projection barrier. Among those not there yet: Nathan, Broxton, Bell, Marmol, Brian Wilson, Street, Jenks, Hoffman, Lidge, etc etc. Might we target a few of these? </p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/fan-projection-targets-010610/#comment-119289</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14197#comment-119289</guid>
		<description>Cool! Fangraphs shout out.  I am honored.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool! Fangraphs shout out.  I am honored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LittlePanda</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/fan-projection-targets-010610/#comment-119252</link>
		<dc:creator>LittlePanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 14:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14197#comment-119252</guid>
		<description>Also, how come the fan projections include Saves, but I don&#039;t see a place to project them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, how come the fan projections include Saves, but I don&#8217;t see a place to project them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hit Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/fan-projection-targets-010610/#comment-119247</link>
		<dc:creator>The Hit Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 14:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14197#comment-119247</guid>
		<description>Ok just did my civic duty. But I&#039;m confused. How can FG calculate stats like WHIP and LOB% when we don&#039;t have an opportunity to project hits allowed (just BB/9)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok just did my civic duty. But I&#8217;m confused. How can FG calculate stats like WHIP and LOB% when we don&#8217;t have an opportunity to project hits allowed (just BB/9)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

