<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fan Projection Targets 2/05/10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/fan-projection-targets-2052010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/fan-projection-targets-2052010/</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:21:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: R M</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/fan-projection-targets-2052010/#comment-128294</link>
		<dc:creator>R M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 14:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=15644#comment-128294</guid>
		<description>They would get trampled in a better division.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They would get trampled in a better division.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The A Team</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/fan-projection-targets-2052010/#comment-128025</link>
		<dc:creator>The A Team</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=15644#comment-128025</guid>
		<description>Weren&#039;t the Twins already the team to beat just on the assumption of a full season of Mauer/Morneau?  The Tigers got marginally worse, the White Sox appear to have moved rather laterally despite the Peavy upgrade, and the Indians and Royals might not even qualify as also-rans.  I think it&#039;s very safe to call the Twins the team to beat in the AL Central.

A better question to ask is: Does this make the Twins a good* team?  I have to go with Yes.

*Good defined as Top 8</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weren&#8217;t the Twins already the team to beat just on the assumption of a full season of Mauer/Morneau?  The Tigers got marginally worse, the White Sox appear to have moved rather laterally despite the Peavy upgrade, and the Indians and Royals might not even qualify as also-rans.  I think it&#8217;s very safe to call the Twins the team to beat in the AL Central.</p>
<p>A better question to ask is: Does this make the Twins a good* team?  I have to go with Yes.</p>
<p>*Good defined as Top 8</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Oil</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/fan-projection-targets-2052010/#comment-128016</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Oil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=15644#comment-128016</guid>
		<description>Kennedy at 1.5ish with a option for 2 is significantly better than O-Dawg for $5, plus incentives, plus perhaps a second year.  I&#039;m not upset with the Nats over this -- I think Kennedy can be a 2, 2.5 win player with an improvement in defense from last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kennedy at 1.5ish with a option for 2 is significantly better than O-Dawg for $5, plus incentives, plus perhaps a second year.  I&#8217;m not upset with the Nats over this &#8212; I think Kennedy can be a 2, 2.5 win player with an improvement in defense from last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

