<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fan Projection Targets: New Year&#8217;s Eve &#8217;09</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/fan-projection-targets-new-years-eve-09/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/fan-projection-targets-new-years-eve-09/</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:27:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LittlePanda</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/fan-projection-targets-new-years-eve-09/#comment-117935</link>
		<dc:creator>LittlePanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 16:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=13956#comment-117935</guid>
		<description>How come there are so few closers projected?

Joe Nathan is missing, along with a host of 2nd tier stoppers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How come there are so few closers projected?</p>
<p>Joe Nathan is missing, along with a host of 2nd tier stoppers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NBH</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/fan-projection-targets-new-years-eve-09/#comment-117872</link>
		<dc:creator>NBH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 03:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=13956#comment-117872</guid>
		<description>Thus far it seems that the fans are very bullish on runs and RBI totals. 

In 2009, there were 28 players that logged 100+ RBI and there were 22 players that logged 100+ runs. But the fans project 45 men to tally 100+ RBI in 2010 and 40 men to tally 100+ runs. 

HR is different - there were 30, 30 HR players in 2009 but the fans only project 24 30 HR hitters in 2010.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thus far it seems that the fans are very bullish on runs and RBI totals. </p>
<p>In 2009, there were 28 players that logged 100+ RBI and there were 22 players that logged 100+ runs. But the fans project 45 men to tally 100+ RBI in 2010 and 40 men to tally 100+ runs. </p>
<p>HR is different &#8211; there were 30, 30 HR players in 2009 but the fans only project 24 30 HR hitters in 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

