<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Johan Santana = Still Really Good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/johan-santana-still-really-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/johan-santana-still-really-good/</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:51:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tonio</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/johan-santana-still-really-good/#comment-74593</link>
		<dc:creator>Tonio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 17:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=4572#comment-74593</guid>
		<description>You clearly missed the whole point of the article. Well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You clearly missed the whole point of the article. Well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: don</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/johan-santana-still-really-good/#comment-73791</link>
		<dc:creator>don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=4572#comment-73791</guid>
		<description>Santana may well pick up more wins because he&#039;s pitching in front of a much better lineup, but Lincecum is sporting a 1.85 FIP and 13K/9 rate despite a couple of much-ballyhooed bad starts to start the year.  Both are benefiting from very low HR/FB rates at the moment, which is a bit of an unknown because neither Lincecum nor Citi Field have been around long enough to know for sure what to expect there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Santana may well pick up more wins because he&#8217;s pitching in front of a much better lineup, but Lincecum is sporting a 1.85 FIP and 13K/9 rate despite a couple of much-ballyhooed bad starts to start the year.  Both are benefiting from very low HR/FB rates at the moment, which is a bit of an unknown because neither Lincecum nor Citi Field have been around long enough to know for sure what to expect there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rwperu34</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/johan-santana-still-really-good/#comment-73714</link>
		<dc:creator>rwperu34</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=4572#comment-73714</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s his RAR/9 as a starter since 2002;

2002-2.52
2003-2.27
2004-2.90
2005-2.75
2006-2.70
2007-1.89
2008-1.73
Car-2.42

Three years ending;
2004-2.67
2005-2.72
2006-2.76
2007-2.46
2008-2.11

My hypothesis for the drop in 2007-2008 is that he was injured during that time but he&#039;s such a freakish athlete he was able to be one of the best in the game where others would have gone to the DL. The rest of 2009 will certainly be interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s his RAR/9 as a starter since 2002;</p>
<p>2002-2.52<br />
2003-2.27<br />
2004-2.90<br />
2005-2.75<br />
2006-2.70<br />
2007-1.89<br />
2008-1.73<br />
Car-2.42</p>
<p>Three years ending;<br />
2004-2.67<br />
2005-2.72<br />
2006-2.76<br />
2007-2.46<br />
2008-2.11</p>
<p>My hypothesis for the drop in 2007-2008 is that he was injured during that time but he&#8217;s such a freakish athlete he was able to be one of the best in the game where others would have gone to the DL. The rest of 2009 will certainly be interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KG</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/johan-santana-still-really-good/#comment-73668</link>
		<dc:creator>KG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=4572#comment-73668</guid>
		<description>While I agree it&#039;s not likely he will end up as good as he is now, remember when people were predicting absolute dominance upon his switch to the NL?  Perhaps after a year of adjustments, that dominance will finally come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree it&#8217;s not likely he will end up as good as he is now, remember when people were predicting absolute dominance upon his switch to the NL?  Perhaps after a year of adjustments, that dominance will finally come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lester bangs</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/johan-santana-still-really-good/#comment-73667</link>
		<dc:creator>lester bangs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=4572#comment-73667</guid>
		<description>One of my pet peeves in baseball analysis is when a writer decides to &quot;blow the lid off&quot; something obvious, like, oh, I don&#039;t know, Johan Santana being really frickin&#039; good. What&#039;s the matter, you didn&#039;t want to expose Albert Pujols today? 

Aim higher, please. Tell us something we *might not* know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my pet peeves in baseball analysis is when a writer decides to &#8220;blow the lid off&#8221; something obvious, like, oh, I don&#8217;t know, Johan Santana being really frickin&#8217; good. What&#8217;s the matter, you didn&#8217;t want to expose Albert Pujols today? </p>
<p>Aim higher, please. Tell us something we *might not* know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lester bangs</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/johan-santana-still-really-good/#comment-73666</link>
		<dc:creator>lester bangs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=4572#comment-73666</guid>
		<description>One of my pet peeves in baseball analysis is when a writer decides to &quot;blow the lid off&quot; something obvious, like, oh, I don&#039;t know, Johan Santana being really frickin&#039; good. What&#039;s the matter, you didn&#039;t want to expose Albert Pujols today? 

Am higher, please. Tell us something we *might not* know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my pet peeves in baseball analysis is when a writer decides to &#8220;blow the lid off&#8221; something obvious, like, oh, I don&#8217;t know, Johan Santana being really frickin&#8217; good. What&#8217;s the matter, you didn&#8217;t want to expose Albert Pujols today? </p>
<p>Am higher, please. Tell us something we *might not* know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David A</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/johan-santana-still-really-good/#comment-73661</link>
		<dc:creator>David A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=4572#comment-73661</guid>
		<description>Amen to this. He seems to have much more movement on his pitches this year (just look at the PitchFX data) particularly his changeup which has just been devastating. I was ecstatic to get him for ONLY $35 in my NL-only auction league when pitchers like Lincecum, Webb, and Peavy were going for not much less. I think he is going to dominate the NL this year much like he dominated the AL between 2004 and 2006.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen to this. He seems to have much more movement on his pitches this year (just look at the PitchFX data) particularly his changeup which has just been devastating. I was ecstatic to get him for ONLY $35 in my NL-only auction league when pitchers like Lincecum, Webb, and Peavy were going for not much less. I think he is going to dominate the NL this year much like he dominated the AL between 2004 and 2006.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

