<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kearns and Duncan in Cleveland</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/kearns-and-duncan-in-cleveland/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/kearns-and-duncan-in-cleveland/</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:21:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TixList.com</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/kearns-and-duncan-in-cleveland/#comment-119946</link>
		<dc:creator>TixList.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14216#comment-119946</guid>
		<description>Whether Brantley should be playing in the OF in 2010 is a different argument, and one that I wouldn&#039;t necessarily disagree with you on. And for a team like CLE, who isn&#039;t likely competing in 2010, it&#039;s probably best to keep him in AAA to start the season.  ZIPS has Brantley playing above avg defense with 282/348/360 and 32 SB&#039;s, which isn&#039;t awful for a 22 yo.  Looks pretty similar to what Andrus put up last year, although better defense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether Brantley should be playing in the OF in 2010 is a different argument, and one that I wouldn&#8217;t necessarily disagree with you on. And for a team like CLE, who isn&#8217;t likely competing in 2010, it&#8217;s probably best to keep him in AAA to start the season.  ZIPS has Brantley playing above avg defense with 282/348/360 and 32 SB&#8217;s, which isn&#8217;t awful for a 22 yo.  Looks pretty similar to what Andrus put up last year, although better defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NEPP</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/kearns-and-duncan-in-cleveland/#comment-119825</link>
		<dc:creator>NEPP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 03:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14216#comment-119825</guid>
		<description>Duncan&#039;s just another in a long line of overhyped Yankees prospects.  He&#039;s a fringe MLB player at best. 

Still, there is no such thing as a bad minor league signing.  Worst case, he can give them passable production as an emergency call-up.  

Kearns has been a disappointment.  I had such high hopes for him earlier in his career...as did the Reds of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duncan&#8217;s just another in a long line of overhyped Yankees prospects.  He&#8217;s a fringe MLB player at best. </p>
<p>Still, there is no such thing as a bad minor league signing.  Worst case, he can give them passable production as an emergency call-up.  </p>
<p>Kearns has been a disappointment.  I had such high hopes for him earlier in his career&#8230;as did the Reds of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Klaassen</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/kearns-and-duncan-in-cleveland/#comment-119767</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Klaassen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 23:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14216#comment-119767</guid>
		<description>Hmmm.... I see that CHONE&#039;s update has Brantley as a -3 hitter now... that changes things a bit. Still seems like he could use some development, and if they seem him as a CF, that position&#039;s taken for the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;. I see that CHONE&#8217;s update has Brantley as a -3 hitter now&#8230; that changes things a bit. Still seems like he could use some development, and if they seem him as a CF, that position&#8217;s taken for the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Klaassen</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/kearns-and-duncan-in-cleveland/#comment-119765</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Klaassen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 23:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14216#comment-119765</guid>
		<description>Sorry for the slightly thin-skiined reponse, it&#039;s all good.

Actually, I don&#039;t think Jackson is ready to be a major-league starter at the moment... he might be in a year, and maybe I&#039;m wrong, but like Brantley, he looks like a 1 WAR guy at this point. I don&#039;t know tons about him other than a couple prospect reports and the projections, so I&#039;m willing to cede to others, but if he&#039;s got a future, why rush him in a rebuilding year, especially when you have cheap options like Kearns and Duncan?

LIke I said, originally I thought LaPorta was going to be the full-time 1B&lt; but then I got the impression that I might be jumping the gun on that. Agree that he&#039;ll get 500+ PAs fashion.

As for corner positions and power.... well, when it comes down to it, for all outfield positoins, you want a guy whose offense + fielding outstrips the position adjustment, however that works. If Ellsbury is only average deffensively left (just hypothetically), but he&#039;s a +10 hitter (my projection, but again that&#039;s just an example), it doesn&#039;t really matter whether he gets it through power, or just getting on base... he&#039;s above average there.

CHONE has Brantley as a -9/150 hitter for 2010, and also has doubts aobut his OF defense (-6 in CF, or -4 position neutral OF) -- I think CLE&#039;s better off letting him develop more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the slightly thin-skiined reponse, it&#8217;s all good.</p>
<p>Actually, I don&#8217;t think Jackson is ready to be a major-league starter at the moment&#8230; he might be in a year, and maybe I&#8217;m wrong, but like Brantley, he looks like a 1 WAR guy at this point. I don&#8217;t know tons about him other than a couple prospect reports and the projections, so I&#8217;m willing to cede to others, but if he&#8217;s got a future, why rush him in a rebuilding year, especially when you have cheap options like Kearns and Duncan?</p>
<p>LIke I said, originally I thought LaPorta was going to be the full-time 1B&lt; but then I got the impression that I might be jumping the gun on that. Agree that he&#039;ll get 500+ PAs fashion.</p>
<p>As for corner positions and power&#8230;. well, when it comes down to it, for all outfield positoins, you want a guy whose offense + fielding outstrips the position adjustment, however that works. If Ellsbury is only average deffensively left (just hypothetically), but he&#039;s a +10 hitter (my projection, but again that&#039;s just an example), it doesn&#039;t really matter whether he gets it through power, or just getting on base&#8230; he&#039;s above average there.</p>
<p>CHONE has Brantley as a -9/150 hitter for 2010, and also has doubts aobut his OF defense (-6 in CF, or -4 position neutral OF) &#8212; I think CLE&#039;s better off letting him develop more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rorad11</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/kearns-and-duncan-in-cleveland/#comment-119678</link>
		<dc:creator>rorad11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 19:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14216#comment-119678</guid>
		<description>If Kearns shortens his swing a bit like he did for a part of last season, he could do okay for the Indians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Kearns shortens his swing a bit like he did for a part of last season, he could do okay for the Indians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TixList.com</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/kearns-and-duncan-in-cleveland/#comment-119672</link>
		<dc:creator>TixList.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 19:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14216#comment-119672</guid>
		<description>Hey Matt,

I was half joking when I said &quot;expect more from fangraphs.&quot;  Sorry to come off as a d-bag, not the intent.  

As for the post, I read it as &quot;Left field was slated for the likes of Michael Brantley and Trevor Crowe — bench fodder at best.&quot; Which means only 1B was available for Laporta, which you suggest he &quot;might be needed.&quot;  All I&#039;m saying is Laporta, assuming healthy, is getting 550AB&#039;s next year, most likely at 1B.  I also wouldn&#039;t be so quick to call Brantley &quot;bench fodder&quot; unless your definition is completely different than mine.  For example, is Austin Jackson, Det&#039;s likely CF for 2010 also bench fodder in your mind?  The players are very similar, so I think you may be selling Brantley short right now.  His combo of plate discipline and speed is attractive.  And before anyone suggests he doesn&#039;t have the pop to play LF, what does that say about the Red Sox front office who just made the decision to put a player with similar pop in a corner?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Matt,</p>
<p>I was half joking when I said &#8220;expect more from fangraphs.&#8221;  Sorry to come off as a d-bag, not the intent.  </p>
<p>As for the post, I read it as &#8220;Left field was slated for the likes of Michael Brantley and Trevor Crowe — bench fodder at best.&#8221; Which means only 1B was available for Laporta, which you suggest he &#8220;might be needed.&#8221;  All I&#8217;m saying is Laporta, assuming healthy, is getting 550AB&#8217;s next year, most likely at 1B.  I also wouldn&#8217;t be so quick to call Brantley &#8220;bench fodder&#8221; unless your definition is completely different than mine.  For example, is Austin Jackson, Det&#8217;s likely CF for 2010 also bench fodder in your mind?  The players are very similar, so I think you may be selling Brantley short right now.  His combo of plate discipline and speed is attractive.  And before anyone suggests he doesn&#8217;t have the pop to play LF, what does that say about the Red Sox front office who just made the decision to put a player with similar pop in a corner?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: longgandhi</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/kearns-and-duncan-in-cleveland/#comment-119617</link>
		<dc:creator>longgandhi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14216#comment-119617</guid>
		<description>That was my point.  Even when he re-focused on his career, there wasn&#039;t anything left in the tank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was my point.  Even when he re-focused on his career, there wasn&#8217;t anything left in the tank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aj</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/kearns-and-duncan-in-cleveland/#comment-119597</link>
		<dc:creator>aj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14216#comment-119597</guid>
		<description>Abuse and neglect. What is he, a puppy?

Neglect? He was injured ALL THE TIME. Abuse? Well, maybe that would explain the injuries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abuse and neglect. What is he, a puppy?</p>
<p>Neglect? He was injured ALL THE TIME. Abuse? Well, maybe that would explain the injuries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aj</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/kearns-and-duncan-in-cleveland/#comment-119596</link>
		<dc:creator>aj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14216#comment-119596</guid>
		<description>Now if only Shapiro could make Kearns and Duncan into one player... he&#039;d have quite the left fielder. Maybe they&#039;ll try an offense early/defensive later platoon? (or vice versa, depending on how often they have leads or need to play catch-up)

@longgandhi: How good of Keans to re-dedicate himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now if only Shapiro could make Kearns and Duncan into one player&#8230; he&#8217;d have quite the left fielder. Maybe they&#8217;ll try an offense early/defensive later platoon? (or vice versa, depending on how often they have leads or need to play catch-up)</p>
<p>@longgandhi: How good of Keans to re-dedicate himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alon</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/kearns-and-duncan-in-cleveland/#comment-119577</link>
		<dc:creator>Alon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14216#comment-119577</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always found this line of criticism disingenuous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always found this line of criticism disingenuous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

