<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Matt Murton DFA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/matt-murton-dfa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/matt-murton-dfa/</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:32:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/matt-murton-dfa/#comment-94298</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 19:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=8772#comment-94298</guid>
		<description>Hm. Right. Forgot about that one.

Same thing happened with Dana Eveland earlier this season. He was DFAed, but ended up just being optioned to AAA Sacramento.

Apparently no one ever claims anyone on optional waivers-- it&#039;s like some kind of unwritten transactional rule. I can&#039;t remember where I read it, but apparently no one has EVER changed teams as a result of an optional waiver claim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm. Right. Forgot about that one.</p>
<p>Same thing happened with Dana Eveland earlier this season. He was DFAed, but ended up just being optioned to AAA Sacramento.</p>
<p>Apparently no one ever claims anyone on optional waivers&#8211; it&#8217;s like some kind of unwritten transactional rule. I can&#8217;t remember where I read it, but apparently no one has EVER changed teams as a result of an optional waiver claim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: puck</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/matt-murton-dfa/#comment-94161</link>
		<dc:creator>puck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 19:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=8772#comment-94161</guid>
		<description>Murton must have passed through waivers, as he played at AAA Colorado Springs last night.

Interesting.  I thought w/a  DFA, that the player had to clear irrevocable waivers (or be traded).  I didn&#039;t know optional waivers were...an option.

Perhaps there will be a trade in the offseason that will open up some playing time for Murton, whether that&#039;s on the Rockies or on another team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Murton must have passed through waivers, as he played at AAA Colorado Springs last night.</p>
<p>Interesting.  I thought w/a  DFA, that the player had to clear irrevocable waivers (or be traded).  I didn&#8217;t know optional waivers were&#8230;an option.</p>
<p>Perhaps there will be a trade in the offseason that will open up some playing time for Murton, whether that&#8217;s on the Rockies or on another team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poseidon's Fist</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/matt-murton-dfa/#comment-93909</link>
		<dc:creator>Poseidon's Fist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=8772#comment-93909</guid>
		<description>According to Tracy Ringolsby:
&quot;I am not sure of the complete details but it seems the Rockies asked for option waivers on Murton when they called him up. That meant he could not be sent down until Friday. As a result he had to be designated. That does not mean he has to be put on waivers, but it means the Rockies have 10 days to deal with his contract. I think that would allow them to assign him to the Springs once Friday passes.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Tracy Ringolsby:<br />
&#8220;I am not sure of the complete details but it seems the Rockies asked for option waivers on Murton when they called him up. That meant he could not be sent down until Friday. As a result he had to be designated. That does not mean he has to be put on waivers, but it means the Rockies have 10 days to deal with his contract. I think that would allow them to assign him to the Springs once Friday passes.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felonius_Monk</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/matt-murton-dfa/#comment-93881</link>
		<dc:creator>Felonius_Monk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=8772#comment-93881</guid>
		<description>because illiterate idiots reply to it with comments like &quot;do any of u guys watch or listen to glenn beck?&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>because illiterate idiots reply to it with comments like &#8220;do any of u guys watch or listen to glenn beck?&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rally</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/matt-murton-dfa/#comment-93858</link>
		<dc:creator>Rally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 04:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=8772#comment-93858</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to see the Angels pick him up.  And DFA Gary Matthew Jr.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to see the Angels pick him up.  And DFA Gary Matthew Jr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe R</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/matt-murton-dfa/#comment-93857</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 04:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=8772#comment-93857</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s also 9 years younger, way less expensive, and has received sporadic playing time. Using WAR to compare a starter to a backup is stupid, he has 40% the PA&#039;s of Fukudome. Projected out, he&#039;d be worth about 1 less win if he had Fukudome&#039;s playing time and cost the Cubs about $12.5 million less.

And yes, .257/.323/.415 for a 23 year old CF is solid. He will be fine. Odds he&#039;s about as good as Fukudome in 2011 without the ridiculous price tag? Likely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s also 9 years younger, way less expensive, and has received sporadic playing time. Using WAR to compare a starter to a backup is stupid, he has 40% the PA&#8217;s of Fukudome. Projected out, he&#8217;d be worth about 1 less win if he had Fukudome&#8217;s playing time and cost the Cubs about $12.5 million less.</p>
<p>And yes, .257/.323/.415 for a 23 year old CF is solid. He will be fine. Odds he&#8217;s about as good as Fukudome in 2011 without the ridiculous price tag? Likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/matt-murton-dfa/#comment-93841</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 01:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=8772#comment-93841</guid>
		<description>What happened to Fred Lewis anyways? I thought he was really going to breakout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to Fred Lewis anyways? I thought he was really going to breakout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/matt-murton-dfa/#comment-93840</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 01:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=8772#comment-93840</guid>
		<description>The Giants certainly SHOULD claim him, but... no, they&#039;ll continue to run Nate Schierholtz, Fred Lewis and the mummified remains of Randy Winn out there instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Giants certainly SHOULD claim him, but&#8230; no, they&#8217;ll continue to run Nate Schierholtz, Fred Lewis and the mummified remains of Randy Winn out there instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hark</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/matt-murton-dfa/#comment-93830</link>
		<dc:creator>Hark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=8772#comment-93830</guid>
		<description>The Mariners do not need outfielders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mariners do not need outfielders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: razor</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/matt-murton-dfa/#comment-93829</link>
		<dc:creator>razor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=8772#comment-93829</guid>
		<description>Murton&#039;s story isn&#039;t that unusual. There are quite a few players like him. His defense may grade out via the metrics as at least average, but I&#039;m not sure any of the organizations he&#039;s played for would agree. In any case, he&#039;s another in a long line of players that haven&#039;t caught a break, or enough of one to establish himself enough to get a 25-man gig consistently. A lot of teams could do worse than Murton as a 4th/5th OF type for sure, but he doesn&#039;t run particularly well and he&#039;s a tweener in terms of power. His on base skills should eventually get him to catch a break, but then again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Murton&#8217;s story isn&#8217;t that unusual. There are quite a few players like him. His defense may grade out via the metrics as at least average, but I&#8217;m not sure any of the organizations he&#8217;s played for would agree. In any case, he&#8217;s another in a long line of players that haven&#8217;t caught a break, or enough of one to establish himself enough to get a 25-man gig consistently. A lot of teams could do worse than Murton as a 4th/5th OF type for sure, but he doesn&#8217;t run particularly well and he&#8217;s a tweener in terms of power. His on base skills should eventually get him to catch a break, but then again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
