<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maximizing Potential</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/maximizing-potential/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/maximizing-potential/</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:52:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mariner Fan in Colorado Exile</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/maximizing-potential/#comment-33242</link>
		<dc:creator>Mariner Fan in Colorado Exile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/maximizing-potential/#comment-33242</guid>
		<description>Can this change be attributed to pitching coach change - new coach, new approach?  I don&#039;t know anything about Dave Eiland, but if I am in his shoes and see the strikeout stuff potential, I&#039;d sure mix it in a bit more to keep hitters guessing and add a strategic weapon to the arsenal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can this change be attributed to pitching coach change &#8211; new coach, new approach?  I don&#8217;t know anything about Dave Eiland, but if I am in his shoes and see the strikeout stuff potential, I&#8217;d sure mix it in a bit more to keep hitters guessing and add a strategic weapon to the arsenal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kwk</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/maximizing-potential/#comment-33189</link>
		<dc:creator>kwk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 02:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/maximizing-potential/#comment-33189</guid>
		<description>Oh, there&#039;s no problem with the GB/FB/LD rates - I love them the way they are.  (I thought that one possible reason for not using K% might be because of confusion due to K% coming from BFP and GB/FB/LD coming from only BIP.)  

Thanks for the link...I figured you had your reasons - I was wondering what they were :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, there&#8217;s no problem with the GB/FB/LD rates &#8211; I love them the way they are.  (I thought that one possible reason for not using K% might be because of confusion due to K% coming from BFP and GB/FB/LD coming from only BIP.)  </p>
<p>Thanks for the link&#8230;I figured you had your reasons &#8211; I was wondering what they were :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Appelman</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/maximizing-potential/#comment-33183</link>
		<dc:creator>David Appelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/maximizing-potential/#comment-33183</guid>
		<description>KWK:  There&#039;s been a lot of discussion about using K% instead of K/9, but here&#039;s the short short version:  I believe K/9 isolates strikeout potential better than K% does.  

You can read the long version here (in the comments):  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/get-to-know-k9/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Get to Know K/9&lt;/a&gt;

I&#039;m not sure I understand the issue with using GB/FB/LD as a percentage of BIP though?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KWK:  There&#8217;s been a lot of discussion about using K% instead of K/9, but here&#8217;s the short short version:  I believe K/9 isolates strikeout potential better than K% does.  </p>
<p>You can read the long version here (in the comments):  <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/get-to-know-k9/" rel="nofollow">Get to Know K/9</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure I understand the issue with using GB/FB/LD as a percentage of BIP though?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KWK</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/maximizing-potential/#comment-33182</link>
		<dc:creator>KWK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/maximizing-potential/#comment-33182</guid>
		<description>Not to go off on a tangent, but why is it that Fangraphs (and this post) uses K/9 and not K%?  I understand that K/9 isn&#039;t going to give you a vastly different picture than K/Batters Faced, and that there might be some confusion caused by the existence of your GB/FB/LD rates that are pulled from BIP numbers only.  I&#039;d just like to see the much cleaner K% (especially for relievers) as the default rate stat for strikeouts on the player pages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to go off on a tangent, but why is it that Fangraphs (and this post) uses K/9 and not K%?  I understand that K/9 isn&#8217;t going to give you a vastly different picture than K/Batters Faced, and that there might be some confusion caused by the existence of your GB/FB/LD rates that are pulled from BIP numbers only.  I&#8217;d just like to see the much cleaner K% (especially for relievers) as the default rate stat for strikeouts on the player pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Au</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/maximizing-potential/#comment-33181</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Au</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/maximizing-potential/#comment-33181</guid>
		<description>Chien Ming Wang is something of a late bloomer. He only got started in the majors three years ago, at the age of 25. So even though he&#039;s 28 on the calendar, he may be more like 24-25 compared to other players. This suggests that he may peak at 31-32, meaning that he has several more years of development ahead.

The line drives are troubling but the offsetting factor is that Wang doesn&#039;t give up many home runs (or walks). So the rise in his strikeouts puts his sabermetric ERA  below 3.00, since (13*1HR+3*11BB-2*27K)/39 IP) represents a subtraction from the constant term, into Cy Young candidate territory.

He should have won his arbitration case last winter (and the Yankees were small-minded to take it there). Oliver Perez, the Met, got $6.5 million (almost $2 million more than Wang asked for) even though he&#039;s a year younger and has worse lifetime stats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chien Ming Wang is something of a late bloomer. He only got started in the majors three years ago, at the age of 25. So even though he&#8217;s 28 on the calendar, he may be more like 24-25 compared to other players. This suggests that he may peak at 31-32, meaning that he has several more years of development ahead.</p>
<p>The line drives are troubling but the offsetting factor is that Wang doesn&#8217;t give up many home runs (or walks). So the rise in his strikeouts puts his sabermetric ERA  below 3.00, since (13*1HR+3*11BB-2*27K)/39 IP) represents a subtraction from the constant term, into Cy Young candidate territory.</p>
<p>He should have won his arbitration case last winter (and the Yankees were small-minded to take it there). Oliver Perez, the Met, got $6.5 million (almost $2 million more than Wang asked for) even though he&#8217;s a year younger and has worse lifetime stats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Appelman</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/maximizing-potential/#comment-33176</link>
		<dc:creator>David Appelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/maximizing-potential/#comment-33176</guid>
		<description>One other thing to note about his GB% is that his LD% is kind of high this year compared to his previous years and it looks like those groundballs from previous years are turning into line-drives.  

If his LD% returns to league average levels (19%-20%), I&#039;d think a lot of them would revert back to being GB instead of FBs.  If he continues with 24% line drives, it could mean trouble. But it&#039;s worth noting that 12 of his 29 line drives so far have been Fliner-Line-Drives, which only fall for hits 63% of the time as opposed to a standard line drive that fall for hits 74% of the time.  Still, not a good thing.

Either way, the strikeouts will definitely help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other thing to note about his GB% is that his LD% is kind of high this year compared to his previous years and it looks like those groundballs from previous years are turning into line-drives.  </p>
<p>If his LD% returns to league average levels (19%-20%), I&#8217;d think a lot of them would revert back to being GB instead of FBs.  If he continues with 24% line drives, it could mean trouble. But it&#8217;s worth noting that 12 of his 29 line drives so far have been Fliner-Line-Drives, which only fall for hits 63% of the time as opposed to a standard line drive that fall for hits 74% of the time.  Still, not a good thing.</p>
<p>Either way, the strikeouts will definitely help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

