Nats Rotation

The Washington Nationals rotation has a 4.86 ERA, a -0.77 WPA, and a -9.17 BRAA. That’s not very good, and from a look at those numbers, you’d probably think Washington needs to find some better starting pitchers. But if you look closer, you’ll see a very interesting breakdown.

Washington’s #1-#4 Starters

Odalis Perez: 3.71 ERA, 4.91 FIP, 0.41 WPA, 4.82 BRAA
Shawn Hill: 3.56 ERA, 3.23 FIP, 0.22 WPA, 3.18 BRAA
Tim Redding: 3.51 ERA, 4.56 FIP, -0.10 WPA, -1.38 BRAA
John Lannan: 3.74 ERA, 4.22 FIP, 0.65 WPA, 3.69 BRAA

Totals: 3.63 ERA, 4.34 FIP, 1.18 WPA, 10.31 BRAA

Washington’s #5 Starters

Matt Chico: 6.87 ERA, 5.19 FIP, -1.03 WPA, -9.61 BRAA
Jason Bergmann: 10.45 ERA, 6.67 FIP, -0.42 WPA, -5.18 BRAA
Mike O’Connor: 24.30 ERA, 10.21 FIP, -0.29 WPA, -4.68 BRAA

Totals: 8.67 ERA, 6.21 FIP, -1.74 WPA, -19.47 BRAA

In just over 50 innings of work, the three guys the Nationals have used to fill their final rotation spot have erased, and then some, the good work done by their teammates. Despite their overall rotations performance, Jim Bowden and company should be quite proud of the fact that they’ve assembled four useful starters for essentially nothing - Lannan, Perez, and Redding were acquired for a combined $1.25 and a couple of signed baseballs. Only Hill (6th round pick in 2000) required an asset to bring in, and let’s be honest, a 6th round pick isn’t the most valuable property in baseball.

They won’t win a championship with Perez-Hill-Lannan-Redding, but they’re the epitome of what you can do with freely available talent when you’re willing to take some flyers on guys with question marks. Along with that comes the downside of what they’ve gotten from their #5 starters, however. Washington has done well filling the front four spots in their rotation, but they’re going to have to do some more work to get a fifth starter who won’t cancel out all the work already done.



As one of the co-founders of ussmariner.com, I have written far too many words on the Seattle Mariners organization. I'm excited about getting to write about well run teams for a change.

3 Comments »

  1. joser said,

    May 15, 2008 @ 11:39 am

    But it’s a great opportunity to apply the “stars and scrubs” model — if they actually went out and spent something to acquire a legit top (or near-top) of the rotation guy to replace all those #5 starts, it upgrades the team enormously.

  2. Eric Seidman said,

    May 15, 2008 @ 11:43 am

    I <3 Shawn Hill.

  3. Jason said,

    May 15, 2008 @ 4:55 pm

    So, what is the team’s record in games started by #5 guys? Last year the M’s actually won a lot more games than you’d think when Weaver and Ho-Ram were getting slaughtered, is that the case here? Or is there real potential for help if the Nats aquire a good starter?

RSS feed for comments on this post

Leave a Comment


Contact Us - - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy