<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Organizational Rankings: #19</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/organizational-rankings-19/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/organizational-rankings-19/</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:03:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hawerchuk</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/organizational-rankings-19/#comment-67499</link>
		<dc:creator>Hawerchuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=3556#comment-67499</guid>
		<description>By these standards, you know who was a great GM?  Chuck LaMar.  Drafted some amazing #1 picks.

Sabean should have lost his job when he intentionally gave up his late first-round picks because he claimed the ROI was higher on second-rounders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By these standards, you know who was a great GM?  Chuck LaMar.  Drafted some amazing #1 picks.</p>
<p>Sabean should have lost his job when he intentionally gave up his late first-round picks because he claimed the ROI was higher on second-rounders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alskor</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/organizational-rankings-19/#comment-67002</link>
		<dc:creator>alskor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=3556#comment-67002</guid>
		<description>It looked like a terrible deal at the time. The market went south and now it looks like an atrocious deal. 

That deal was widely mocked at the time it was signed. Word was nobody else was in on Renteria for anything near that price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looked like a terrible deal at the time. The market went south and now it looks like an atrocious deal. </p>
<p>That deal was widely mocked at the time it was signed. Word was nobody else was in on Renteria for anything near that price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noli</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/organizational-rankings-19/#comment-66802</link>
		<dc:creator>Noli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 04:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=3556#comment-66802</guid>
		<description>and i agree that the dreifort deal was probably worse, although one would reply by saying that the financial burden of zito&#039;s contract on the giants is a lot more than the burden of dreifort&#039;s contract on the dodgers (given the total contract, the amount of years and the different payrolls).

but, i think the hampton deal was &quot;better&quot; largely because the giants basically gave zito what was at the time the largest contract ever for a pitcher. that means you think that he is the best pitcher, or one of the top 5 best pitchers, in baseball. at the time, he wasnt even in the top 10...or 15...perhaps in the top 20! Sabean outbid himself (i still dont believe the mariners offered him more) and gave ace/cy young money to a pitcher whose stats were OK, but not ace/cy young like. Zito was four years removed from his cy young season...and in those 4 years between, we saw his numbers decline to a 7-8 million dollar type pitcher. The giants threw 15 million dollar money at him because they wanted to save face after losing out on carlos lee and soriano and to try to prepare themselves for post Bonds with another Barry on the roster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and i agree that the dreifort deal was probably worse, although one would reply by saying that the financial burden of zito&#8217;s contract on the giants is a lot more than the burden of dreifort&#8217;s contract on the dodgers (given the total contract, the amount of years and the different payrolls).</p>
<p>but, i think the hampton deal was &#8220;better&#8221; largely because the giants basically gave zito what was at the time the largest contract ever for a pitcher. that means you think that he is the best pitcher, or one of the top 5 best pitchers, in baseball. at the time, he wasnt even in the top 10&#8230;or 15&#8230;perhaps in the top 20! Sabean outbid himself (i still dont believe the mariners offered him more) and gave ace/cy young money to a pitcher whose stats were OK, but not ace/cy young like. Zito was four years removed from his cy young season&#8230;and in those 4 years between, we saw his numbers decline to a 7-8 million dollar type pitcher. The giants threw 15 million dollar money at him because they wanted to save face after losing out on carlos lee and soriano and to try to prepare themselves for post Bonds with another Barry on the roster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noli</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/organizational-rankings-19/#comment-66798</link>
		<dc:creator>Noli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 03:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=3556#comment-66798</guid>
		<description>I remember the giants insistence in starting over the hill mark gardner over joe nathan. now, nathan was likely never going to be a starter (if so, he would be marginal at best), but the mind set of the organization during the bonds-kent era was to build their team around veteran pickups by trading their prospects and not financially supporting player development. If they happen to let a prospect get through to the majors...likely a pitcher...they had a relatively short leash on him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember the giants insistence in starting over the hill mark gardner over joe nathan. now, nathan was likely never going to be a starter (if so, he would be marginal at best), but the mind set of the organization during the bonds-kent era was to build their team around veteran pickups by trading their prospects and not financially supporting player development. If they happen to let a prospect get through to the majors&#8230;likely a pitcher&#8230;they had a relatively short leash on him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/organizational-rankings-19/#comment-66688</link>
		<dc:creator>B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 19:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=3556#comment-66688</guid>
		<description>At least let Renteria play a real game in a Giants uniform before we throw it in with the other bad veteran signings.  It may end up that Sabean paid more for Renteria than the other shortstops on the market, but he outproduces them.  Someone else also might have signed Renteria early if the Giants didn&#039;t, so they may not have had the chance to get him specifically for less (though of course they could have gotten someone like Cabrera for less).  Basically my point is at this moment in time all we can do is speculate since Renteria hasn&#039;t even played a game yet, let&#039;s have some patience before we judge the signing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least let Renteria play a real game in a Giants uniform before we throw it in with the other bad veteran signings.  It may end up that Sabean paid more for Renteria than the other shortstops on the market, but he outproduces them.  Someone else also might have signed Renteria early if the Giants didn&#8217;t, so they may not have had the chance to get him specifically for less (though of course they could have gotten someone like Cabrera for less).  Basically my point is at this moment in time all we can do is speculate since Renteria hasn&#8217;t even played a game yet, let&#8217;s have some patience before we judge the signing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mymrbig</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/organizational-rankings-19/#comment-66660</link>
		<dc:creator>mymrbig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=3556#comment-66660</guid>
		<description>Good point about Zito, but I was kind of being facetious with my 3rd point.  Zito vs. Dreifort vs. Hampton vs. Neagle is kind of a worthless discussion because all 4 pitchers were almost worthless relative to what they were paid.  

I think Hampton will turn out to be the best of the bunch.  I think his first 2 years in Coors were pre-Humidor, so they weren&#039;t quite as bad as they look.  Then he turned in 2.5 averagish seasons with Atlanta before the injuries really took hold.  He was still overpaid, but the quality of his IP will probably end up being a good bit better than Zito.  

With so much young pitching in the organization, does Zito get to stick around as an overpaid #5 if he can get (and keep) his ERA around 5?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point about Zito, but I was kind of being facetious with my 3rd point.  Zito vs. Dreifort vs. Hampton vs. Neagle is kind of a worthless discussion because all 4 pitchers were almost worthless relative to what they were paid.  </p>
<p>I think Hampton will turn out to be the best of the bunch.  I think his first 2 years in Coors were pre-Humidor, so they weren&#8217;t quite as bad as they look.  Then he turned in 2.5 averagish seasons with Atlanta before the injuries really took hold.  He was still overpaid, but the quality of his IP will probably end up being a good bit better than Zito.  </p>
<p>With so much young pitching in the organization, does Zito get to stick around as an overpaid #5 if he can get (and keep) his ERA around 5?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mymrbig</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/organizational-rankings-19/#comment-66655</link>
		<dc:creator>mymrbig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=3556#comment-66655</guid>
		<description>The Renteria signing is a little hard to judge.  The free agents who signed early this year all did so before the market imploded.  It didn&#039;t look like a terrible deal at the time, particularly considering what the Giants got out of SS last year.  

But you are certainly right that if the Giants had waited a month or two they probably could have had Renteria for 1/3 to 1/2 of the money.  Pretty much every team that made early signings this year ended up overpaying because of the way the market developed.  They paid 2007/08 prices, which were much higher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Renteria signing is a little hard to judge.  The free agents who signed early this year all did so before the market imploded.  It didn&#8217;t look like a terrible deal at the time, particularly considering what the Giants got out of SS last year.  </p>
<p>But you are certainly right that if the Giants had waited a month or two they probably could have had Renteria for 1/3 to 1/2 of the money.  Pretty much every team that made early signings this year ended up overpaying because of the way the market developed.  They paid 2007/08 prices, which were much higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/organizational-rankings-19/#comment-66635</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=3556#comment-66635</guid>
		<description>&quot;has consistently overpaid for declining veterans (Matt Morris, Dave Roberts, and Aaron Rowand)&quot;

dont forget to add Edgar Renteria to that list...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;has consistently overpaid for declining veterans (Matt Morris, Dave Roberts, and Aaron Rowand)&#8221;</p>
<p>dont forget to add Edgar Renteria to that list&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/organizational-rankings-19/#comment-66625</link>
		<dc:creator>B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=3556#comment-66625</guid>
		<description>I somewhat agree with your take on the AJ trade - the Giants knew Liriano had injury issues when they traded him, and unless he stays health for a substantial period of time in the future it&#039;s really not a big loss.  Bonser is closer to a replacement level starter than anything.  Nathan, however, has been the best reliever in baseball since the Twins acquired him, and the Giants have been in desperate need of his services over that time.  What makes the trade so bad for Giants fans is the fact that AJ was such a....we flat out released him after one season, and because we didn&#039;t have a closer, it led to the Herges debacle, and then the Benetiz disaster.

With regards to Zito, honestly, I wouldn&#039;t be surprised to see him more or less out of the league within a year or two.  His stuff is as bad as ever, his control/command has shown 0 improvement...at some point his 5ish ERA just isn&#039;t going to cut it anymore.  I really don&#039;t think he&#039;ll get to Neagle or Hampton, though he should pass Dreifort.

As for Sabean, like you said, he&#039;s been a terrible GM.  It does appear he&#039;s somewhat improving though, and it helps that the organization is changing their strategy to focus on what he&#039;s good at, the scouting/development side of things.  As bad as most of his free agent moves and trades have been, he also drafted Cain, Lincecum and Sanchez and restocked our farm system quickly with very good drafts and international signings - if he continues to focus on this side of things the Giants should start producing home grown players on par with well run franchises like the Red Sox or Twins.  I never understood why a GM with a scouting background completely ignored that side of things for as long as Sabean did...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I somewhat agree with your take on the AJ trade &#8211; the Giants knew Liriano had injury issues when they traded him, and unless he stays health for a substantial period of time in the future it&#8217;s really not a big loss.  Bonser is closer to a replacement level starter than anything.  Nathan, however, has been the best reliever in baseball since the Twins acquired him, and the Giants have been in desperate need of his services over that time.  What makes the trade so bad for Giants fans is the fact that AJ was such a&#8230;.we flat out released him after one season, and because we didn&#8217;t have a closer, it led to the Herges debacle, and then the Benetiz disaster.</p>
<p>With regards to Zito, honestly, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to see him more or less out of the league within a year or two.  His stuff is as bad as ever, his control/command has shown 0 improvement&#8230;at some point his 5ish ERA just isn&#8217;t going to cut it anymore.  I really don&#8217;t think he&#8217;ll get to Neagle or Hampton, though he should pass Dreifort.</p>
<p>As for Sabean, like you said, he&#8217;s been a terrible GM.  It does appear he&#8217;s somewhat improving though, and it helps that the organization is changing their strategy to focus on what he&#8217;s good at, the scouting/development side of things.  As bad as most of his free agent moves and trades have been, he also drafted Cain, Lincecum and Sanchez and restocked our farm system quickly with very good drafts and international signings &#8211; if he continues to focus on this side of things the Giants should start producing home grown players on par with well run franchises like the Red Sox or Twins.  I never understood why a GM with a scouting background completely ignored that side of things for as long as Sabean did&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcello</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/organizational-rankings-19/#comment-66619</link>
		<dc:creator>marcello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=3556#comment-66619</guid>
		<description>Yeah, maybe even two years.  Sandoval is the starting 3B and Gillaspie is starting out at A+.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, maybe even two years.  Sandoval is the starting 3B and Gillaspie is starting out at A+.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

