FanGraphs Logo

Pedroia to SS?

Here’s an interesting twist to the Red Sox off-season; Peter Gammons reports that they have asked Dustin Pedroia whether he would be willing to move to shortstop next year, and he told Gammons that he’s all for it. Shifting Pedroia to the left side of the infield would allow Boston to pursue a second baseman, which are plentiful this off-season, rather than being forced to meet Marco Scutaro‘s demands to land the only decent shortstop on the market.

Could Pedroia play shortstop effectively? It seems likely.

His career UZR/150 at second base is +7.4, and the observed effect of players shifting between the two middle infield positions is between 5 to 10 runs. Pedroia’s UZR would suggest that he would be something like an average defensive shortstop.

The fan’s scouting report offers a similar picture. Pedroia graded out as the fifth best second baseman in the game, coming in above average in every single category. Often times, arm strength is a reason a shortstop is moved to second base, but the fan’s think his arm is just fine.

Experience wouldn’t be a problem, either. He played shortstop in college at Arizona State, then played an additional 132 games at the position in the minor leagues. He actually played more SS than 2B in the minors. While he hasn’t played the position in three years, he wouldn’t be learning a new position – he’s spent most of his life playing shortstop, and the reactions would come naturally.

Ironically, Scutaro himself may be providing the necessary optimism for why this move could work. He was primarily a second baseman early in his career, but was shifted to play mostly shortstop in 2005 at the age of 30, and has held his own at the position since. Alexei Ramirez also made the transition across the bag last year with success, so this isn’t a move without some precedent.

This move won’t make Pedroia significantly more valauble, as what he adds in offensive scarcity compared to the average shortstop, he’ll probably give back with the glove, but it would give the Red Sox significantly more flexibility this winter. Rather than having to pay for Scutaro, they could set their sights on a second baseman such as Orlando Hudson, Placido Polanco, or Felipe Lopez.

It sounds like it is still in the conversation stages, but it is an idea with merit, and the Red Sox should strongly consider going forward with Pedroia as their starting shortstop.



Print This Post

Dave is a co-founder of USSMariner.com and contributes to the Wall Street Journal.

121 Responses to “Pedroia to SS?”

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Click here to view comments in a non-threaded output.
  1. JoeR43 says:

    Also a slight litmus test of how tough playing 2B actually is.
    Most everyone thinks Pedroia is a top 5 defensive 2B, we may find out what that means in terms of shortstops.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  2. Snake the Jake says:

    I wish the Reds would do this with Brandon Phillips.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  3. LorenzoStDuBois says:

    This may be implied in your post, but the end result of this discussion of Pedroia at SS could just be a lower price tag on Scutaro, no?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  4. Justin says:

    I have a hard time believing Pedroia is athletic enough to play short. If he was average defensively I would be surprised.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • mattymatty says:

      Lack of athleticism isn’t Pedroia’s problem. If he weren’t so athletic, he wouldn’t be in the major leagues at 5 foot 6. Given the whole off season (just about) to prepare, he should be able to approximate an average or slightly above major league shortstop.

      Who would you rather have in your line up and in the field, Marco Scutaro and his magical beans or any number of quality second baseman (Hudson, Polanco, etc.)? I really like this idea and I hope the Sox go for it.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Justin says:

        They are all pretty comparable, but I’d rather have Scutaro because he can play second and short, and play them both pretty well.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Eric says:

      Are you kidding me? Pedroia is very athletic he steals 15+ bases a year, and if you actually watched him play on the field you see the guy diving on every play and doing everything as hard as he can. Pedroia is PLENTY athletic.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Sandy Kazmir says:

        A guy diving all over the place tells me he doesn’t have great range, it’s akin to saying that Jeter is athletic because he’s always jumping and throwing. If either had the range they wouldn’t have to put on the grit act.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Tom B says:

        sandy, if you think it’s an act… try watching a game.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Eric says:

        Did I ever say he had great range? I was saying he was very athletic. Way to read the question and put words in my mouth. Besides, he DOES have good range, I honestly don’t know if you’re talking about the same Pedroia that I’m talking about.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Justin says:

        Stealing bases doesn’t automatically make you capable of playing shortstop, and it doesn’t make you athletic enough to play shortstop.

        If we are talking about Pedroia’s athleticism versus the general population, then he is above average. If we are talking about it versus the shortstop population, then he is below average.

        His work ethic is never questioned, sometimes physical skills prevent players from doing things no matter how hard they work.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • alskor says:

        This portrayal of Pedroia as a gritty, unathletic type is hilarious.

        He’s exceptionally quick and athletic for a MLB 2B – and plenty quick for a MLB SS. That is not at all the issue. The issue is his arm is average to below average for a MLB SS.

        People have been using poor examples, but nonetheless, Pedroia is actually very athletic, even for a MLB middle infielder.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Sandy Kazmir says:

        All I said was that if he was diving all over the place than he probably doesn’t have great range. Either that or being the illegitimate son of an elf and Eddie Gaedel makes it very hard to get to a lot of balls.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

  5. Rob in CT says:

    Interesting idea. Not sure he has the arm, but if all he needs to do is be adequate he could probably pull it off. Bring in the O-Dog to play 2nd… yeah. I can see why they’re at least thinking about it.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  6. Judy says:

    That’s interesting, because Scutaro doesn’t really seem any more athletic than Pedroia to me.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • alskor says:

      He’s not. Pedroia is very athletic with tons of range. Not the problem at all. His arm was ok, too.

      He was moved from SS to 2B for team need, with the possibility open he could move back at some point… he excelled at 2B so well they decided best not to tinker with what works.

      Initially it was thought he could play SS in the majors fine. I think he definitely still could. He’s got lots of range, is extremely quick and makes great, quick reads. His arm is subpar for a SS, but not terrible. The overall package is probably an average to above average SS. When he was moved, the feeling was he could be a pretty average SS or a fantastic 2B. I think that is still true.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Judy says:

        He also seemed a little chunkier and slower when he first came up than he does now, and he’d still been playing as much SS as 2B up until then.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

  7. Sandy Kazmir says:

    I did a workup on Polanco over at Draysbay using some different things. Starting with Dan S’s MLE calculator I looked at Polanco’s last 3 years (weighted 2/3/5) to find that if he had put up those same numbers in Boston he would be looking at a slash of 0.308/0.356/0.423/0.779 vs. his Detroit slash of 0.303/0.348/0.415/0.763. This may seem minor so using the 2OPS/3 cheat I converted to wOBA to find his Boston wOBA would have been .378 vs. the .370 he had playing in a less offense-inflated environment. Again, this may seem minor, but I have the AL average 2B at .341. Converting this war wRAA you would go from 15.1 to 19.2 runs. That’s almost half a win more if he had played in Boston.

    SS was the weak link in Boston in 2009. I had it at -1 win compared to the average AL SS, while Pedroia was worth 2.8 wins over the average AL 2B. Even if you knock an entire win of Pedroia with the switch, he would still be a huge upgrade over the schlock they threw out there last year. Using Polanco’s wRAA at 600 PA he would have been worth 2.7 wins over the average 2B had he played in Fenway for more than a handful of games and giving him a UZR of 8.2 (again weighting the last 3 years 2/3/5). So basically, they would still have a Pedroia-type player on 2B while going from an abyss to a molehill at SS. I think Boston getting Polanco, provided Pedroia takes to SS like a duck to water, could be a bigger upgrade than Holliday over Bay.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Justin says:

      There is no way Polanco puts up a .378 wOBA. If he is league average I would be surprised.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Sandy Kazmir says:

        He has been trending down linearly, but don’t underestimate the Fenway effect. He doesn’t K much and would be an ideal candidate to pepper the Monster. As a Rays fan I hope they get someone more like O-Dawg. Keep in mind that the least weighted season in that was an absolute monster 3 years ago. Maybe not the best way to try to find the MLE, but it’s quick and dirty, and gives an idea of where he would stand in that park.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Nathaniel Dawson says:

      Unless I’m misunderstanding what you were doing there, you made a couple of mistakes. First, when you convert wOBA to runs above average, you have to compare it to the league average, not the average for second basemen. Also, if you’re going to be using park factors, you can’t apply Boston’s park factor to Polanco’s Detroit numbers. You have to apply Detroit’s park factor to his numbers and then compare his wOBA to the league average to get RAA.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Sandy Kazmir says:

        Instead of adding positional back in at the end I compare it to the league average for that position to see how he compares to all AL 2B. I could compare it to the league average, but I only care how he compares to 2B, not everyone. The Detroit park factor is inherent in his numbers which the MLE calculator then converts from what it is like to play in Detroit to what it is like to play in Boston.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

  8. pete says:

    very interesting thought…I’ve no doubt that pedroia has enough athleticism to have an MLB-average or better caliber glove, but I’m really not sure his arm is strong enough for the position

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  9. Tyler says:

    The bottom line is there is no harm in discussing it before arb offerings take place if only to shift your chips and keep other teams, agents, and players on their toes. I doubt he would be worse defensively than Lugo and they literally won a WS with him.

    The issue is still finding a bat. The move would let them go get a 2b with something to bring to the table offensively. I’d rather they stop worrying about it and trade for Miggy and sign Lackey. It needs to be both if they want to catch NY. Big power hitter and pitcher, not one or the other… that will not get it done.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • alskor says:

      The Yankees run differential was +162 in 2009, while the Sox were +136. Theyre really not that far apart, considering the Sox had to deal with some timely injuries and the ineffectiveness of Ortiz and Lowell (just as in 08 the Yanks werent quite as bad as they appeared and had injuries to key players at bad times). With steps forward from Buchholz and other young players theyre right on their heels already. Add in that the Yanks are an old team with lots of 35+ year olds… it wouldnt take a whole lot to shift the balance.

      Point being, the Sox are one of the best teams in baseball as presently constructed. They arent two franchise/5 WAR players behind the Yanks.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Joe R says:

        I just wonder how much stock to put into the Red Sox disproportionate struggle vs. top tier opponents in 2009.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • alskor says:

        vs. NYY: 9-9
        vs. TBR: 9-9
        vs. MIN: 4-2
        vs. DET: 6-1
        vs. LAA: 4-5
        vs. TEX: 2-7

        That’s the 1st and 2nd place teams (and 3rd place for TB). That was a mediot storyline that had no merit to begin with.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Tom B says:

        this assumes alot, like, not a single player on the yankees getting better next year.

        also, 1 win over .500 against the top talents in the league doesn’t prove whatever point you were going for.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Tyler says:

        I don’t think it was injuries that derailed them. They are done being productive (at a high level).V Mart was a step in the right direction, but they still have no one in the lineup that makes people fear them.

        I agree about CB’s steps. They are needed and significant. I still would like to see another SP added.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • JoeR43 says:

        You check their OPS split against the “top pitchers” relative to the other 3 playoff teams? It was BRUTAL.

        http://cache.boston.com/bonzai-fba/Third_Party_Graphic/2009/10/08/aced_out__1254995855_5883.gif

        I know that I’m not supposed to jump on the SSS bandwagon, but, oof. That’s kind of alarming.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • JoeR43 says:

        And Tyler, I think that’s what the Sox prefer at this point. Why break the bank for one player when you can hedge your bets with two good ones?

        Outside of Lowell, there’s no contract on the team right now that makes a person go “ouch”. Ortiz will make $13,000,000 in 2010 and I don’t think he’ll approach the ~ 3 WAR he needs to justify it, but he’ll likely be around 2, which is okay. Drew is a little better than his contract, Ellsbury’s still a young bargain, Pedroia, Youk, and V-Mart are big bargains, and as much as people are sick of V-tek, even okayness as a spell catcher is acceptable for $3,000,000. Lester’s dirt cheap relatively at $6 mil / year (he’s a 9+ K/9 guy for about 40% what he’d command on the open market).

        Essentially, the Red Sox and Theo Epstein, even with all the money, aren’t looking to hit a home run with one FA signing. Part of the reason why they traded for Martinez, in my opinion, is that they’d rather have him going forward than pay 2x as much for Mauer.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • alskor says:

        “this assumes alot, like, not a single player on the yankees getting better next year.”

        As I pointed out, the Yankees are old, had a number of career years and got lucky. Where can they get better? Joba and Hughes I suppose. But again, my point was not that the Sox are better to or equal to NY. My point is it wouldnt take a whole lot for the Yankees to lose their advantage. Theyre vulnerable due to their age at so many key spots. The Sox are comparatively, a younger team.

        “also, 1 win over .500 against the top talents in the league doesn’t prove whatever point you were going for.”

        I wasn’t “going for” anything. Someone characterized that record as a “disproportionate struggle.” That characterization is clearly not accurate.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Tom B says:

        cano is the only one on the roster that arguably had a “career year”.

        why is it that when the red sox players get old, everyone thinks the team can just cast them aside and move on, but if a yankee gets old it’s the end of the world and the team is going to fall apart?

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Dirty Water says:

        What you say, Tom B?

        Rivera, 39: ERA+ 21% bettah than career avg
        Damon, 35: OPS+ 18% bettah than career avg
        Posada, 38: OPS+ 6% bettah than career avg
        Jeter, 35: OPS+ 5% bettah than career avg
        Matsui, 35: OPS+ 2% bettah than career avg
        Aroid, 34: OPS+ 3% worse than career avg
        Pettitte, 37: ERA+ 6% worse than career avg

        Each of whom is over 34 years old.

        And then we have:
        Cabrera, OPS+ 14% bettah than career avg
        Swisher, OPS+ 10% bettah than career avg
        Cano, OPS+ 10% bettah than career avg
        Sabathia, ERA+ 7% bettah than career avg
        Teixeira, OPS+ 4% bettah than career avg
        Burnett, ERA+ 4% worse than career avg

        Note: I wrote that elsewhere on 9/7 so allow some correction.

        If you MFY fans actually believe 2009 was a normal season for such an old group of players I can’t wait for your tears in 2010. Reversion to the mean will be a term that makes your stomach turn.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Tom B says:

        you should be familiar with the term, as 2004 and 2007 are what we call “peaking”.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Dirty Water says:

        As can be said about pretty much every other champ, except those repeat defenders, like the MFY of ’96′ – ’00.

        But please do not assume that team is any better then they were 1, 2…8 years ago. It’s old; its FO still prioritizes sluggers over pitching and D; and let me be the first to bring to the fore: the team will be run efficiently once Papa Stein passes. And that means no more 1/2 billion dollar spending sprees to make up for one of worst farm systems in baseball.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • alskor says:

        Wait, Im confused Tom B… they didn’t have “career years”, but they’re “peaking”…?

        Yeah, okay.

        It must be exhausting talking out of both sides of your mouth, but as Yankee fan you surely have lots of practice.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Tom B says:

        a drive by snipe 3 days after the thread is over? typical.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

  10. Trenchtown says:

    If nothing else letting this story “leak” puts the Red Sox in better bargaining position with potential SS free agents like Scutaro. They might not even be actually considering it

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  11. Hey, if Ryan Theriot can do it (no arm at all), so can D. Peds

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  12. 92-93 says:

    If only the Jays had done this with another natural SS, Aaron Hill.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  13. Eric says:

    First of all Pedroia can play shortstop and he’s had a lot of success in the past. In the minor leagues, he played shortstop and was only moved because of Hanley Ramirez. Pedroia played short in the University of Arizona and won the award for the conference’s top defensive player. His arm would be fine in short, for proof watch the video of him back in 2006: http://mlb.mlb.com/media/video.jsp?content_id=7142455

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Tom B says:

      what a great highlight real… a lazy popup to deep short, a shoft chopper that he had time to charge, catch, set, and throw to get ty wiggington, and a ground ball up the middle that the sox were shifted towards(for markakis it looks like) that he dove over the bag to make a play on.

      yeah, i’m sold on his arm now.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Eric says:

        People were playing his arm out to be terrible. In the video, his arm is not terrible. That’s all I’m trying to prove. It’s an average arm for a shortstop.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Tom B says:

        in the video he throws one ball on a play that could easily be made by 85% of the high school shortstops in the country.

        if you are trying to prove his arms worth, find a video where he actually does something impressive.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

  14. R M says:

    I hate the idea of the Red Sox getting Scutaro. What makes everyone think he can maintain his 2009 level of production? What says he doesn’t return to his ~.320 wOBA pre-2009 self? Plus, he has been an average to below average fielder throughout his career other than one season (2008), which is too small of a sample to mean a whole lot with UZR. Moving Pedroia could be a great move…I would be all for it. Shortstop has plagued the organization since the departure of Garciaparra….although it would open up a hole at 2nd, it would be great to finally have a long-term quality SS. Plus, it would keep the Sox from going after Renteria take 3.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  15. PhD Brian says:

    I have little doubt Pedroia can be an average SS next season. Its a very wise move, by a very wise and wealthy franchise just to publicly consider it.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  16. frank giovannozzi says:

    What about Lowry?? Always thought he would make a better 2nd sacker.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  17. Sky Kalkman says:

    Moving Pedroia to shortstop opens up the possibility of another position switch — Adrian Beltre to second base. Beltre’s great defensively and his offensive numbers would see a huge boost going from Seattle to Boston. When Mike Lowell’s contract expires, they’d have the ability to sign or promote any infield position, with the flexibility provided by Pedroia/Beltre/Youkilis.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Eric says:

      WHAT? You want to move the best defensive third baseman in the game to second? What even led you to think he could play second base?

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  18. pack says:

    What an oddly content free article.

    Where’s the table of the handful of people who have made the switch having their numbers compared? Are there MLEs for fielding when he played some short? Scouting reports from his draft class.

    What about comparing some prominent utility guys? There’s more of them than 2b to SS transfers. For instance, Alex Cora has reverse UZRs for 2b/SS over his career. Derossa is only a run worse SS to 2B. Alexei Ramirez was always expected to be a short stop.

    It doesn’t even say what sort of offensive level he would have to produce to offset X runs lost to defensive inefficiencies.

    What was the point of this article again?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • JoeR43 says:

      The fact that it’s not exactly common to move a gold glove caliber player to another position while they’re still fielding said position at a high level.

      Imagine if A-Rod goes down in the first inning of 2009 and Girardi says “I’m moving Teixeira to 3B because he’s good defensively and can handle it, and we have more options for 1B within the system.” There would be people throwing a shitfit.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Tom B says:

        people would be throwing a shitfit because that would make absolutely no sense. it’s not even relevant to this situation. moving from SS to 3b? 2b to SS? CF to LF? those all make sense because the positions exhibit similar skill sets. nothing about stretching for a ball at 1b translates into catching screaming line drives at 3b or throwing 120feet across the diamond..

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • pack says:

        There’s just no analysis in the article, which is rare and disappointing for FanGraphs. I would expect this sort of blurb on rotoworld or mlbtraderumors, but not here.

        “His career UZR/150 at second base is +7.4, and the observed effect of players shifting between the two middle infield positions is between 5 to 10 runs. Pedroia’s UZR would suggest that he would be something like an average defensive shortstop.”

        Is the most compelling chunk of info in the article, but isn’t backed up by any substantiated numbers. It’s a good topic, that’s why I complained. Are players bound to their position too often? This article offered the author an opportunity to offer a methodology for judging players switching positions but he shirked it (Sorry Dave, I like most of your articles!).

        I’ve heard it said Longoria would make a fine shortstop. It’d be interesting to see a methodology to support/refute that opinions. *hint* *hint*

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • JoeR43 says:

        First off, you asked why this article was written, and I used an analogy to explain why. Teixeira also started as a 3B in the minors. Obviously 3B is much tougher than 1B, but both require the ability to field screamers, which is to the observational eye what Teixeira seems to be pretty good at.

        But I digress, what kind of analysis is there really to give? Pedroia’s never played SS at the MLB level, but he’s played it at the college and minor league level enough for us to use the “go with what we’ve seen” angle. Not really sure how much more digging we can do outside of the eye check, which is obviously not as good as UZR, but also, it’s better than citing his minor league RF or Fielding %.

        And what’s the positional adjustment, like, 2.0 per 600 PA for a 2B and 7.5 per 600 PA for a SS? So maybe Pedroia projects to be a +1.9 UZR/150 level SS if/once he gets his legs under him at the position?

        I’m just not sure what kind of analysis one could want when there’s no real data to back it outside of eye checking and wild ass guessing.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

    • R M says:

      Did you already know that the Red Sox were considering moving Pedroia to shortstop before reading this? There have been tons of studies on the effect of a position change on the value of a player….this is clearly not meant to be an analysis of how Pedroia’s value would be affected by a position change. Most likely it would not change at all. The point is that the added flexibility it would give the Red Sox in filling their vacant position could be very valuable.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

      • R M says:

        “this is clearly not meant to be an analysis of how Pedroia’s value would be affected by a position change”

        to clear that up, I mean beyond the argument that Pedroia could make the switch fairly smoothly, I don’t think it’s supposed to be an analysis of how Pedroia’s value would be affected by a position change.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

    • pack says:

      I hate hilariously small genitalia.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  19. JoeR43 says:

    I do know that among the cess that is a lot of my fellow Sox fans, there exists a good deal of smart Red Sox fans as well. Many of them have wanted to see a move to SS for Pedroia, since he has played there plenty in the past, and he’s more athletic now than he was then.

    But to Sky: Beltre at 2nd base? Signing a 31 year old Free agent to play a position that he’s played a grand total of 1 inning at while in MLB? Even given Beltre’s defense, that’s a bit risky, don’t you think? I do agree that he’d see a nice offensive spike at Fenway, though (maybe closer to his 2008 Fenway-adjusted line of .278/.340/.474).

    Then again, the Red Sox do need a 3B going forward (and Youkilis is probably too 1B-ified to move back over full time), and Beltre shows no sign of losing anything defensively. Essentially if you think his ISO will pick back up (and losing at his 2009 HR/FB mark vs. career, I can almost guarantee it will), then Beltre could be a very nice addition to the Red Sox.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Tom B says:

      the sox better do something with this positional logjam they created, and IMO it should involve youkilis starting 3B or LF permanently. if they think that v-mart is just going to go back to being a full time catcher with no issue they are in for a big surprise.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

      • JoeR43 says:

        That’s why Varitek will still be a help (I wouldn’t be shocked if he still gets 1-2 games a week routinely).

        And Youkilis, as much as I love the guy and how he plays, is NOT an outfielder. At this point, he’s been at first for so long, I’d worry a bit how his defense would look in a permanent 3B role.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

  20. Sky Kalkman says:

    For those wondering why we are assuming typical skillsets can transfer between positions with known adjustments:

    http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/position-adjustments
    http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/second-base-is-the-new-third-base
    http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/historical-position-adjustments
    a Book Blog search link that’s too long to post

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  21. Judy says:

    You do realize you’re talking about the exact same position switch that utility IFers make all the time?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Tom B says:

      there is a huge difference between a backup player switching positions a few times a month, and a full-time player trying to play a new position at a high level over a full season.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  22. Judy says:

    Still, it’s the position he played most of his life until just a few years ago. He isn’t really learning a new position any more than Asdrubal Cabrera was last year. Scutaro comes a lot closer to having actually done that, if you ask me.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Tom B says:

      yes, but he wasn’t good enough(arm strength) to be a major league shortstop. His abilities at second base outweighed his shortcomings as a powerless slaphitter to allow him to play in the majors. I understand that he was moved because of all the other SS’s in the organization, but we’d be speaking of him in the same light as cabrera, or scutaro if he was brought up as a SS, not as a former MVP second basemen.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  23. Short says:

    I bet Jose Lopez’ dead-pull RH bat would work out pretty good at Fenway. Assuming the Sox have something to deal the M’s want, of course. And if the Sox would rather give up talent than money to fill the need at 2B.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  24. Marc Delanoe says:

    Just wanted to stop by to say thanks for this great post.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  25. I’m so happy to determine the following type of posts . I respect a lot and hope to see another excellent posts on your weblog . I agree with most of the issues you said , and i enjoy the valuable points you shared . Many thanks a great deal and wish you the very best with your internet website.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  26. Hey there the names Jacqualine Blass. I found the fastest article to make a huge amount extremely easily and fast. The folks are only accepting 1000 people. This is the site http://www.nbc20news.com I hope this helps someone. Jacqualine Blass Gisin134@yahoo.com

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  27. Nikolai Volkoff says:

    pedroia, a 3 foot 9 inch second baseman going to shortstop, brilliant.
    so much for the “all world” sox farm system and the prospects. I thought they had the second coming of honus wagner ready to step up, like lars anderson was the next lou gehrig.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  28. Lita Aalund says:

    good but me find it nott to be good.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  29. I visited a lot of website but I conceive this one contains something special in it in it

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  30. A relative recommended that I check out your site. Im happy that Im here.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  31. Bože, ja mislio da ste bili ce se usjeci s nekim odlucujuca insght na kraju tamo, a ne ga ostaviti s ‘smo ga ostaviti na vama je da odlucite’.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  32. make blog says:

    I in addition to my pals have already been looking at the excellent points located on the website and so all of a sudden I got an awful suspicion I had not expressed respect to the web blog owner for those strategies. The ladies are actually for that reason joyful to read all of them and have honestly been enjoying these things. Appreciate your truly being well helpful and also for opting for this kind of really good guides millions of individuals are really wanting to understand about. My honest apologies for not saying thanks to you earlier.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  33. I truly wanted to make a message to say thanks to you for all the pleasant steps you are writing at this site. My long internet look up has now been compensated with extremely good information to go over with my family members. I would suppose that we readers actually are extremely blessed to live in a notable network with very many wonderful individuals with interesting opinions. I feel pretty lucky to have used your entire web site and look forward to really more thrilling minutes reading here. Thanks a lot again for a lot of things.
    Restoran Bas Britanski Trg, Ivana Kukuljevica 1, 10000 Zagreb

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  34. Very helpful. I like the means you write. Do you provide an Feed? – If I were two

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  35. Phung Red says:

    Great blog! I dont think Ive seen most of the angles on this subject the manner in which youve cleared them out. Youre a true star, a rock star man. Youve got a lot to express and know much regarding the subject that I think you’ll want to just teach a category concerning this…HaHa!

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  36. Just wish to say your article is as astounding. The clearness in your publish is just nice and i can think you are knowledgeable in this subject. Fine together with your permission let me to grab your RSS feed to stay updated with coming near near post. Thank you one million and please carry on the rewarding work.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  37. 3864624866 says:

    Hi, I was quering the internet and I discovered your web site. Keep up the good work.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  38. I like this web blog very much, Its a real nice spot to read and obtain information.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  39. Hello. Neat article. There is a problem with the website in firefox, and you might want to test this… The browser is the market chief and a huge section of other folks will omit your wonderful writing due to this problem.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  40. I was just looking for this info for a while. After six hours of continuous Googleing, finally I got it in your web site. I wonder what is the Google’s problem that doesn’t rank this kind of informative web sites closer to the top. Normally the top web sites are full of garbage.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  41. I and my friends were digesting the excellent solutions from your web blog and unexpectedly got a horrible feeling I had not expressed respect to the web site owner for those strategies. Those young men are already totally very interested to read through them and now have clearly been loving those things. Appreciation for really being so helpful as well as for settling on some important tips most people are really wanting to know about. Our sincere apologies for not saying thanks to earlier.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  42. Your site does not display appropriately on my iphone 4 – you might want to try and repair that

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  43. This web page does not display appropriately on my blackberry – you may wanna try and repair that

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  44. you’ve gotten an ideal weblog here! would you wish to make some invite posts on my blog?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  45. I completely believe you. Everyone loves this informative article. Its full of a lot of useful information. I will set up my new idea with this post. It gives complete information. Thank you this informative information for everyone. And of course nice review concerning the Veterans fight along with their present prospect.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  46. I don’t usually respond to posts however will in such a case. My God, i think you were going to chip with some decisive insght towards the end there, not let it sit with ‘we allow to soak someone to decide’.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  47. We are always searching online for articles to help me. Anticipating another excellent blog. All the best ! to the author! take care!

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  48. Someone said about the same article of yours and it also was quite good. This is a great article many thanks for sharing this informative information. I am going to call at your blog regularly for some latest post.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  49. Hmm it seems like your site ate my first comment (it was super long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I submitted and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog. I too am an aspiring blog blogger but I’m still new to everything. Do you have any tips and hints for beginner blog writers? I’d certainly appreciate it.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  50. Aw, this was a truly good post. In thought I would like to spot in writing in this way moreover – taking time and actual effort to create a quite great article… but what / items I say… I procrastinate alot and also no indicates apparently get something done.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  51. Dane Misumi says:

    Glad to be one of several visitants on this amazing internet internet site : D.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  52. I would like to thank you for the efforts you’ve made in writing this post. I’m hoping the same ideal function from you in the future too. In fact your creative writing abilities has inspired me to start my own BlogEngine weblog now

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  53. Rame says:

    This is the fitting blog for anyone who needs to find out about this topic. You realize so much its nearly hard to argue with you (not that I truly would want…HaHa). You undoubtedly put a new spin on a topic thats been written about for years. Great stuff, just great!

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  54. JG says:

    I don’t understand the purpose of these spam posts on all these really old FG articles…

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  55. Loodgieter says:

    Hello Is it possible you explain to me exactly what template it is your working with for your site? i have tried using to use shopperpress to promote acne solutions however i can not seem to convert my traffic with it here is a sample of a acne product we are sellingIn the event you might sent me a web link to your developer or template company that would be wonderful, ill actually throw in a back link for your site for helping me outAppreciate it Anna

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  56. Many thanks for taking the time to discuss this, I really feel can uncover any details in article and discus forum

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  57. Care to give some more details? :)

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  58. Wow! Thank you! I always needed to write inside my site the like. Am i allowed to take part of this post to my blog?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  59. It may sound like you’re creating problems yourself by trying to solve this trouble instead of investigating why their is a problem from the beginning.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  60. Suggestions says:

    I do think it is the single most major facts to me. That i’m thrilled reading your report. Although should review about several standard things, The internet site type is certainly great, the actual posts is actually exceptional : Deb. Beneficial employment, all the best

    Vote -1 Vote +1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>




Player Linker - Contact Us - Advertise - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy