<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pitcher Win Values Explained: Part Six</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/pitcher-win-values-explained-part-six/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/pitcher-win-values-explained-part-six/</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:42:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: VegasPaleHoseFan</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/pitcher-win-values-explained-part-six/#comment-141114</link>
		<dc:creator>VegasPaleHoseFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=2415#comment-141114</guid>
		<description>Are the Park Factors used for 2009 available?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the Park Factors used for 2009 available?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samg</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/pitcher-win-values-explained-part-six/#comment-59915</link>
		<dc:creator>Samg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=2415#comment-59915</guid>
		<description>Any chance of combining the hitting and pitching values for pitchers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any chance of combining the hitting and pitching values for pitchers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samg</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/pitcher-win-values-explained-part-six/#comment-59880</link>
		<dc:creator>Samg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 00:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=2415#comment-59880</guid>
		<description>Why not adjust every facet of a hitter&#039;s/pitcher&#039;s game separately, because they way they derive value may or may not benefit from his park factor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not adjust every facet of a hitter&#8217;s/pitcher&#8217;s game separately, because they way they derive value may or may not benefit from his park factor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/pitcher-win-values-explained-part-six/#comment-59857</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=2415#comment-59857</guid>
		<description>Does anyone try to do park factors that depend on handedness?  For example, Safeco doesn&#039;t hurt LHB like Ibanez but it kills RHB like Beltre.  LHP do better than RHP for the same reason.  Seems like this is a pretty straightforward thing that would dramatically improve their accuracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone try to do park factors that depend on handedness?  For example, Safeco doesn&#8217;t hurt LHB like Ibanez but it kills RHB like Beltre.  LHP do better than RHP for the same reason.  Seems like this is a pretty straightforward thing that would dramatically improve their accuracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Appelman</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/pitcher-win-values-explained-part-six/#comment-59851</link>
		<dc:creator>David Appelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=2415#comment-59851</guid>
		<description>Everything you need to know about the park factors and how they&#039;re calculated and why they&#039;re calculated the way they are can be found here:
http://gosu02.tripod.com/id103.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything you need to know about the park factors and how they&#8217;re calculated and why they&#8217;re calculated the way they are can be found here:<br />
<a href="http://gosu02.tripod.com/id103.html" rel="nofollow">http://gosu02.tripod.com/id103.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldDogNewTricks</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/pitcher-win-values-explained-part-six/#comment-59838</link>
		<dc:creator>OldDogNewTricks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=2415#comment-59838</guid>
		<description>I understand park factors and why they are a good idea. But what is meant by &quot;5 year regressed park factor&quot;?  How is the regressed part done?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand park factors and why they are a good idea. But what is meant by &#8220;5 year regressed park factor&#8221;?  How is the regressed part done?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Wyers</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/pitcher-win-values-explained-part-six/#comment-59794</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Wyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=2415#comment-59794</guid>
		<description>The home team is only half of the park factor - the visiting team&#039;s performance counts as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The home team is only half of the park factor &#8211; the visiting team&#8217;s performance counts as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samg</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/pitcher-win-values-explained-part-six/#comment-59777</link>
		<dc:creator>Samg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=2415#comment-59777</guid>
		<description>I only know of the six component form.  I think it is a great stat, but maybe some tweaks on the sixth (fielding) factor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only know of the six component form.  I think it is a great stat, but maybe some tweaks on the sixth (fielding) factor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Appelman</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/pitcher-win-values-explained-part-six/#comment-59775</link>
		<dc:creator>David Appelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=2415#comment-59775</guid>
		<description>I used to calculate Speed Score when the site first launched, but it was taken off for one reason or another.  I think there&#039;s a high chance it makes a return this season, maybe in its new 6 component form, though I don&#039;t know if there&#039;s much of a difference between the 6 component and 4 component forms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to calculate Speed Score when the site first launched, but it was taken off for one reason or another.  I think there&#8217;s a high chance it makes a return this season, maybe in its new 6 component form, though I don&#8217;t know if there&#8217;s much of a difference between the 6 component and 4 component forms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/pitcher-win-values-explained-part-six/#comment-59774</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=2415#comment-59774</guid>
		<description>Since they cut down on foul territory a few years ago, it plays a bit more neutral overall.  Actually, in the summer I think it&#039;s a bit hitter friendly, which is more or less evened out in the early spring and late fall.  Don&#039;t have the numbers for this, however.  It&#039;s just a guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since they cut down on foul territory a few years ago, it plays a bit more neutral overall.  Actually, in the summer I think it&#8217;s a bit hitter friendly, which is more or less evened out in the early spring and late fall.  Don&#8217;t have the numbers for this, however.  It&#8217;s just a guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

