<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rowing the Cano</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/rowing-the-cano/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/rowing-the-cano/</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:52:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh S</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/rowing-the-cano/#comment-75745</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 19:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=4858#comment-75745</guid>
		<description>Paddling Cano --- could be ---- misinterpreted to say the least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paddling Cano &#8212; could be &#8212;- misinterpreted to say the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob in CT</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/rowing-the-cano/#comment-75728</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob in CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 17:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=4858#comment-75728</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s truth in this, I think.  I watch just about every game.  Cano still does get himself out a lot - particularly in pressure situations.  The hope is that as he matures, he does that less and less.  We&#039;ll see.

His production will likely always be volatile because of his hacktastic ways.  Even a more patient Cano won&#039;t be particularly patient, and because of that he will be more prone to the vagueries of chance.  I don&#039;t understand what goes on with his defense other than to say that I think he may take offensive frustrations out to the field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s truth in this, I think.  I watch just about every game.  Cano still does get himself out a lot &#8211; particularly in pressure situations.  The hope is that as he matures, he does that less and less.  We&#8217;ll see.</p>
<p>His production will likely always be volatile because of his hacktastic ways.  Even a more patient Cano won&#8217;t be particularly patient, and because of that he will be more prone to the vagueries of chance.  I don&#8217;t understand what goes on with his defense other than to say that I think he may take offensive frustrations out to the field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt H.</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/rowing-the-cano/#comment-75720</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=4858#comment-75720</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Greg on that, I read it as fulfilling the desire for a good fielder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Greg on that, I read it as fulfilling the desire for a good fielder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan3457</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/rowing-the-cano/#comment-75706</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan3457</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=4858#comment-75706</guid>
		<description>Cano is a major front in the battle between &quot;the scouts&quot; and the &quot;stat-heads&quot;.

The &quot;scouts&quot; (fans who pay little attention to the numbers) will tell you that despite his BAVG, Cano is poor with RISP, horrendous with the bases loaded, and can&#039;t be counted on in the great majority of clutch situations because much of the time, he&#039;ll try to hit pitcher&#039;s pitches, and get himself out, usually in a most unproductive fashion. 

Further, they&#039;ll tell you that he&#039;s lazy, reacts slowly on many plays, and cannot be counted on to make the intelligent play, or even be where he&#039;s supposed to be when he&#039;s supposed to be there. Finally, they&#039;ll tell you he usually doesn&#039;t bust it down the line, and sometimes loses chances to pick up bases, either forcing errors, or advancing extra bases on hits, errors, or pitches that get away.

The numbers people say that he&#039;s a terrific hitter for a second baseman, that his power will peak at something like 25 HR a year, and eventually, he&#039;s likely to make some progress with his walk rate. They&#039;ll also tell you that his defense is underrated, that he has a very strong arm that allows to complete tough plays and turn tough pivots on double plays that a secondbaseman with a weaker arm wouldn&#039;t even attempt.

Me? I think the truth is somewhere in between. I think he&#039;s better than average, but not as much as his adjusted numbers seem to show. Take a look at his WPA for instance. It&#039;s been in negative numbers every year except for the year he hit .342. It&#039;s even negative this season, despite the hot start. The Yanks are under .500, but not that far, and a lot of their negative value is on the pitching anyway.

I&#039;d a lot rather have Cano than say, oh, Luis Castillo or Mike Fontenot, but I&#039;m not ready to put him on All-Star teams yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cano is a major front in the battle between &#8220;the scouts&#8221; and the &#8220;stat-heads&#8221;.</p>
<p>The &#8220;scouts&#8221; (fans who pay little attention to the numbers) will tell you that despite his BAVG, Cano is poor with RISP, horrendous with the bases loaded, and can&#8217;t be counted on in the great majority of clutch situations because much of the time, he&#8217;ll try to hit pitcher&#8217;s pitches, and get himself out, usually in a most unproductive fashion. </p>
<p>Further, they&#8217;ll tell you that he&#8217;s lazy, reacts slowly on many plays, and cannot be counted on to make the intelligent play, or even be where he&#8217;s supposed to be when he&#8217;s supposed to be there. Finally, they&#8217;ll tell you he usually doesn&#8217;t bust it down the line, and sometimes loses chances to pick up bases, either forcing errors, or advancing extra bases on hits, errors, or pitches that get away.</p>
<p>The numbers people say that he&#8217;s a terrific hitter for a second baseman, that his power will peak at something like 25 HR a year, and eventually, he&#8217;s likely to make some progress with his walk rate. They&#8217;ll also tell you that his defense is underrated, that he has a very strong arm that allows to complete tough plays and turn tough pivots on double plays that a secondbaseman with a weaker arm wouldn&#8217;t even attempt.</p>
<p>Me? I think the truth is somewhere in between. I think he&#8217;s better than average, but not as much as his adjusted numbers seem to show. Take a look at his WPA for instance. It&#8217;s been in negative numbers every year except for the year he hit .342. It&#8217;s even negative this season, despite the hot start. The Yanks are under .500, but not that far, and a lot of their negative value is on the pitching anyway.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d a lot rather have Cano than say, oh, Luis Castillo or Mike Fontenot, but I&#8217;m not ready to put him on All-Star teams yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asinkingship</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/rowing-the-cano/#comment-75702</link>
		<dc:creator>asinkingship</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=4858#comment-75702</guid>
		<description>Agreed. Nice pun, except you paddle a canoe, not row.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. Nice pun, except you paddle a canoe, not row.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dapuj</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/rowing-the-cano/#comment-75692</link>
		<dc:creator>dapuj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 15:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=4858#comment-75692</guid>
		<description>http://xkcd.com/386/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://xkcd.com/386/" rel="nofollow">http://xkcd.com/386/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/rowing-the-cano/#comment-75689</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 15:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=4858#comment-75689</guid>
		<description>Can I at least say that the title of this article was one of the most groan-worthy puns I&#039;ve heard in weeks? I don&#039;t know if that&#039;s worthy of pride or shame. Possibly both!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I at least say that the title of this article was one of the most groan-worthy puns I&#8217;ve heard in weeks? I don&#8217;t know if that&#8217;s worthy of pride or shame. Possibly both!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richie Abernathy</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/rowing-the-cano/#comment-75682</link>
		<dc:creator>Richie Abernathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 13:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=4858#comment-75682</guid>
		<description>I agree.  I&#039;m sure many of us who care about the statistical analysis to understanding baseball have thought of this, but Cano is the guy I want to talk to and say, &quot;you know, if you are more patient at the plate, you&#039;ll have a decade&#039;s worth of silver slugger awards.&quot;  Anyway, the kid&#039;s swing is a thing of beauty and the pop is obviously there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  I&#8217;m sure many of us who care about the statistical analysis to understanding baseball have thought of this, but Cano is the guy I want to talk to and say, &#8220;you know, if you are more patient at the plate, you&#8217;ll have a decade&#8217;s worth of silver slugger awards.&#8221;  Anyway, the kid&#8217;s swing is a thing of beauty and the pop is obviously there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Seidman</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/rowing-the-cano/#comment-75673</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 11:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=4858#comment-75673</guid>
		<description>Do I care?  Of course... I pride myself on being a good writer and if I pen something nobody understands, it&#039;s an issue.  But an entire comment thread dedicated to that sentence and not Robinson Cano makes me hate comment threads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do I care?  Of course&#8230; I pride myself on being a good writer and if I pen something nobody understands, it&#8217;s an issue.  But an entire comment thread dedicated to that sentence and not Robinson Cano makes me hate comment threads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colm</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/rowing-the-cano/#comment-75651</link>
		<dc:creator>Colm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 04:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=4858#comment-75651</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Eric cares somewhat.  
But besides him, how about people who want to understand what he&#039;s writing?
[I&#039;ve just spent an hour distilling the meaning from some syntactically convoluted business-speak spilled on the page by a couple of my coworkers.  I&#039;m in no mood to listen to your excuses for sloppy grammar.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Eric cares somewhat.<br />
But besides him, how about people who want to understand what he&#8217;s writing?<br />
[I've just spent an hour distilling the meaning from some syntactically convoluted business-speak spilled on the page by a couple of my coworkers.  I'm in no mood to listen to your excuses for sloppy grammar.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

