<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Royals Sign Ankiel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/royals-sign-ankiel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/royals-sign-ankiel/</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:38:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/royals-sign-ankiel/#comment-125508</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14911#comment-125508</guid>
		<description>The whole thumbs down thing is getting pretty stupid when you have someone at a net -30 or whatever without a single response stating why people find the comment so unbearable.  If you disagree with what someone is saying, fine, state your reasoning instead and maybe we can all be enlightened.  However, if it just gets your drawers in a twist to see someone disagree with the author of the post then maybe you should be reading a different website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole thumbs down thing is getting pretty stupid when you have someone at a net -30 or whatever without a single response stating why people find the comment so unbearable.  If you disagree with what someone is saying, fine, state your reasoning instead and maybe we can all be enlightened.  However, if it just gets your drawers in a twist to see someone disagree with the author of the post then maybe you should be reading a different website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felonius_Monk</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/royals-sign-ankiel/#comment-124747</link>
		<dc:creator>Felonius_Monk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14911#comment-124747</guid>
		<description>I disagree because Lafayette co Real Estate is run by pedophiles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree because Lafayette co Real Estate is run by pedophiles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/royals-sign-ankiel/#comment-124741</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14911#comment-124741</guid>
		<description>As a cardinals fan who&#039;s watched almost every single game during Ankiel&#039;s outfield tenure, I was extremely happy to see him sign with the Royals. It&#039;s a case of significant addition by subtraction. Yes, he does have a cannon arm. But he also takes some of the worst routes I&#039;ve ever seen by a centerfielder. We took to calling him &quot;Skates&quot; Ankiel because of how bad his first step is. First step in, fall down, then chase down the ball that went over your head. Maybe I&#039;m missing something and the goal of a centerfielder is to make elaborate zig zag designs while chasing down fly balls. If so, then he is one of the best. Also, as far as hitters go, I&#039;d like to know what pitch he can hit. Hard stuff, soft stuff, strikes, balls, high, low, inside, outside, he doesn&#039;t hit anything hard on a consistent basis. Several times during last season opposing managers intentionally walked 2 hitters to get to ankiel. And as far as him being injured last season, he was hitting just as bad before he crashed into the wall as he did after. He has absolutely no plate discipline. The guy is a head case who crumbles in pressure situations and should have spent most of last season in the minors. I hope you enjoy that sub 700 ops and atrocious defense because that&#039;s what you&#039;re going to get. But on the plus side, have you seen the guy throw a football? He can really chuck it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a cardinals fan who&#8217;s watched almost every single game during Ankiel&#8217;s outfield tenure, I was extremely happy to see him sign with the Royals. It&#8217;s a case of significant addition by subtraction. Yes, he does have a cannon arm. But he also takes some of the worst routes I&#8217;ve ever seen by a centerfielder. We took to calling him &#8220;Skates&#8221; Ankiel because of how bad his first step is. First step in, fall down, then chase down the ball that went over your head. Maybe I&#8217;m missing something and the goal of a centerfielder is to make elaborate zig zag designs while chasing down fly balls. If so, then he is one of the best. Also, as far as hitters go, I&#8217;d like to know what pitch he can hit. Hard stuff, soft stuff, strikes, balls, high, low, inside, outside, he doesn&#8217;t hit anything hard on a consistent basis. Several times during last season opposing managers intentionally walked 2 hitters to get to ankiel. And as far as him being injured last season, he was hitting just as bad before he crashed into the wall as he did after. He has absolutely no plate discipline. The guy is a head case who crumbles in pressure situations and should have spent most of last season in the minors. I hope you enjoy that sub 700 ops and atrocious defense because that&#8217;s what you&#8217;re going to get. But on the plus side, have you seen the guy throw a football? He can really chuck it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TCQ</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/royals-sign-ankiel/#comment-124673</link>
		<dc:creator>TCQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14911#comment-124673</guid>
		<description>I really can&#039;t figure what&#039;s going on with the ratings. I have a +24(with zero negative ratings - probably blown that now) and basically no idea why.

My guess would be that people read Dave&#039;s article, were convinced(and it was certainly a good article) and dropped into the comments only to see like six posts patently disagreeing. It left a bit of a sour taste in my mouth too, to be honest, but especially in regards to the Marcels point, there really isn&#039;t a good argument against it, except maybe that Cameron&#039;s projection could be dialed back a bit - ~.340 with upside, maybe - without changing his overall point.

I do like the thumbs up/thumbs down, though. It&#039;s interesting at least, if nothing else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really can&#8217;t figure what&#8217;s going on with the ratings. I have a +24(with zero negative ratings &#8211; probably blown that now) and basically no idea why.</p>
<p>My guess would be that people read Dave&#8217;s article, were convinced(and it was certainly a good article) and dropped into the comments only to see like six posts patently disagreeing. It left a bit of a sour taste in my mouth too, to be honest, but especially in regards to the Marcels point, there really isn&#8217;t a good argument against it, except maybe that Cameron&#8217;s projection could be dialed back a bit &#8211; ~.340 with upside, maybe &#8211; without changing his overall point.</p>
<p>I do like the thumbs up/thumbs down, though. It&#8217;s interesting at least, if nothing else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JonnyBS</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/royals-sign-ankiel/#comment-124644</link>
		<dc:creator>JonnyBS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14911#comment-124644</guid>
		<description>Yes, Ankiel probably is not going to add more than a win, but if he rebounds, Moore can flip him during trade deadline for a prospect or two.  Cheap upside is never bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Ankiel probably is not going to add more than a win, but if he rebounds, Moore can flip him during trade deadline for a prospect or two.  Cheap upside is never bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KIG1</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/royals-sign-ankiel/#comment-124636</link>
		<dc:creator>KIG1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14911#comment-124636</guid>
		<description>Ankiel was a fan favorite in STL and I&#039;m kind of sad to see him go, but it was the right move. I won&#039;t miss him swinging at sliders in the dirt, but will miss his throws.

For the Royals, it&#039;s a pretty decent signing. He&#039;ll hit around .255 / .315 with 15-20 HR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ankiel was a fan favorite in STL and I&#8217;m kind of sad to see him go, but it was the right move. I won&#8217;t miss him swinging at sliders in the dirt, but will miss his throws.</p>
<p>For the Royals, it&#8217;s a pretty decent signing. He&#8217;ll hit around .255 / .315 with 15-20 HR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vivaelpujols</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/royals-sign-ankiel/#comment-124619</link>
		<dc:creator>vivaelpujols</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 03:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14911#comment-124619</guid>
		<description>Okay then, I&#039;ll accept it&#039;s a problem with me.  Can those who disagree with most posts please stand up and say why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay then, I&#8217;ll accept it&#8217;s a problem with me.  Can those who disagree with most posts please stand up and say why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Current Thread Tally</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/royals-sign-ankiel/#comment-124614</link>
		<dc:creator>Current Thread Tally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 01:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14911#comment-124614</guid>
		<description>you + viva = -95
everyone else = +149

Maybe the problem&#039;s not with the voters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you + viva = -95<br />
everyone else = +149</p>
<p>Maybe the problem&#8217;s not with the voters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TCQ</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/royals-sign-ankiel/#comment-124602</link>
		<dc:creator>TCQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14911#comment-124602</guid>
		<description>Fair enough. He&#039;s definitely not a huge minus though, especially if he&#039;s used correctly(i.e. not in center), which I guess is the point I was making.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough. He&#8217;s definitely not a huge minus though, especially if he&#8217;s used correctly(i.e. not in center), which I guess is the point I was making.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joser</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/royals-sign-ankiel/#comment-124592</link>
		<dc:creator>joser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14911#comment-124592</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t worry about.  There seems to be a fair chunk of the readership that contributes nothing but clicking on the thumbs-down arrow on just about every post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t worry about.  There seems to be a fair chunk of the readership that contributes nothing but clicking on the thumbs-down arrow on just about every post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

