<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Team Pages Updated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/team-pages-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/team-pages-update/</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:35:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SamoanRob</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/team-pages-update/#comment-48783</link>
		<dc:creator>SamoanRob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 16:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/team-pages-update/#comment-48783</guid>
		<description>Thanks. The team pages are great. Check out the Indians Relief WPA from 2005-2008. They yo-yo from 4th to 30th to 2nd to 29th. Kind of explains how they are surpisingly good or surprisingly bad every year now.

I have a theory that the bottom relief WPA teams exceed expectations the following year and vice versa. Not that relief is luck, but it doesn&#039;t seem to repeat. Not sure how to test the theory tho. 

Guess who had the top Relief WPA in the AL and NL this year (Hint: they&#039;re still playing)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. The team pages are great. Check out the Indians Relief WPA from 2005-2008. They yo-yo from 4th to 30th to 2nd to 29th. Kind of explains how they are surpisingly good or surprisingly bad every year now.</p>
<p>I have a theory that the bottom relief WPA teams exceed expectations the following year and vice versa. Not that relief is luck, but it doesn&#8217;t seem to repeat. Not sure how to test the theory tho. </p>
<p>Guess who had the top Relief WPA in the AL and NL this year (Hint: they&#8217;re still playing)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Appelman</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/team-pages-update/#comment-48617</link>
		<dc:creator>David Appelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/team-pages-update/#comment-48617</guid>
		<description>SamoanRob, it&#039;s a run environment thing, where it&#039;s not perfectly balanced and it&#039;s really difficult to get it exactly balanced.  12 wins isn&#039;t going to make much of a difference anyway and I think the consensus on how much work it was to fix just isn&#039;t worth the .05 wins that a full time pitcher/batter would lose/gain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SamoanRob, it&#8217;s a run environment thing, where it&#8217;s not perfectly balanced and it&#8217;s really difficult to get it exactly balanced.  12 wins isn&#8217;t going to make much of a difference anyway and I think the consensus on how much work it was to fix just isn&#8217;t worth the .05 wins that a full time pitcher/batter would lose/gain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SamoanRob</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/team-pages-update/#comment-48614</link>
		<dc:creator>SamoanRob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/team-pages-update/#comment-48614</guid>
		<description>Cool. Just wondering why WPA doesn&#039;t &#039;balance&#039;.  Pitchers add up to positive 11.82 WPA (hitters negative 11.82). Is it cuz of errors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool. Just wondering why WPA doesn&#8217;t &#8216;balance&#8217;.  Pitchers add up to positive 11.82 WPA (hitters negative 11.82). Is it cuz of errors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Appelman</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/team-pages-update/#comment-48608</link>
		<dc:creator>David Appelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/team-pages-update/#comment-48608</guid>
		<description>Splits have been on the to-do list for a while.  Hopefully I can get them done this off-season.  Glad everyone is liking the new team pages!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Splits have been on the to-do list for a while.  Hopefully I can get them done this off-season.  Glad everyone is liking the new team pages!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Podhorzer</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/team-pages-update/#comment-48584</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Podhorzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/team-pages-update/#comment-48584</guid>
		<description>David, fantastic as usual. I would love to also see you add split stats for both players and teams such as vs. lefties/righties, home/away and maybe even monthly and pre/post-ASB. Is this something you might add in the future?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, fantastic as usual. I would love to also see you add split stats for both players and teams such as vs. lefties/righties, home/away and maybe even monthly and pre/post-ASB. Is this something you might add in the future?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Foy</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/team-pages-update/#comment-48465</link>
		<dc:creator>David Foy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/team-pages-update/#comment-48465</guid>
		<description>Exceptional job</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exceptional job</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Gallagher</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/team-pages-update/#comment-48461</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Gallagher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 21:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/team-pages-update/#comment-48461</guid>
		<description>The new pages are amazing. Huzzah to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new pages are amazing. Huzzah to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Au</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/team-pages-update/#comment-48444</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Au</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/team-pages-update/#comment-48444</guid>
		<description>Thanks, David. This is a lot better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, David. This is a lot better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snepp</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/team-pages-update/#comment-48439</link>
		<dc:creator>snepp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/team-pages-update/#comment-48439</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re awesome.

That is all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re awesome.</p>
<p>That is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

