<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Gambler and the Investor: Two Models of Fandom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/the-gambler-and-the-investor-two-models-of-fandom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/the-gambler-and-the-investor-two-models-of-fandom/</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:42:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric/OR</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/the-gambler-and-the-investor-two-models-of-fandom/#comment-93785</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric/OR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=8622#comment-93785</guid>
		<description>Carson: I agree with you on the FD book.  I definitely enjoyed it, but I felt like, quite often, it tried to shoehorn empirical/logical arguments into what basically amounted to aesthetic preferences; Captain Jack is a good example.  When you combine some of these claims with the, ah, bombastic (not really an insult) writing style, I did find it a tough pill to swallow in certain spots.  

Still a great read, though, and it&#039;s certainly a credit to Shoals et al that you can discuss the writing in such terms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carson: I agree with you on the FD book.  I definitely enjoyed it, but I felt like, quite often, it tried to shoehorn empirical/logical arguments into what basically amounted to aesthetic preferences; Captain Jack is a good example.  When you combine some of these claims with the, ah, bombastic (not really an insult) writing style, I did find it a tough pill to swallow in certain spots.  </p>
<p>Still a great read, though, and it&#8217;s certainly a credit to Shoals et al that you can discuss the writing in such terms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobo</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/the-gambler-and-the-investor-two-models-of-fandom/#comment-93670</link>
		<dc:creator>bobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 03:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=8622#comment-93670</guid>
		<description>to lame cook,

no just really sleepy.  thanks for slandering an entire group of people because you lack the ability to detect sarcasm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to lame cook,</p>
<p>no just really sleepy.  thanks for slandering an entire group of people because you lack the ability to detect sarcasm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carson Cistulli</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/the-gambler-and-the-investor-two-models-of-fandom/#comment-93644</link>
		<dc:creator>Carson Cistulli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=8622#comment-93644</guid>
		<description>Eric, Free Darko is a Tour de Force, and their prose styling -- which I&#039;m prepared to describe as &quot;frigging ebullient&quot; -- is off the proverbial hizzy. One thing of which I&#039;m sometimes a little bit skeptical in re FD is when they champion certain players -- like a Stephen Jackson, for example -- who, regardless of certain virtues, just aren&#039;t that good. To be fair, however, Shoals is on the record as saying that he supports quantitative analysis basketball, so long as it doesn&#039;t eclipse the fact that the game is supposed to be celebrated. I echo his sentiments real hard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric, Free Darko is a Tour de Force, and their prose styling &#8212; which I&#8217;m prepared to describe as &#8220;frigging ebullient&#8221; &#8212; is off the proverbial hizzy. One thing of which I&#8217;m sometimes a little bit skeptical in re FD is when they champion certain players &#8212; like a Stephen Jackson, for example &#8212; who, regardless of certain virtues, just aren&#8217;t that good. To be fair, however, Shoals is on the record as saying that he supports quantitative analysis basketball, so long as it doesn&#8217;t eclipse the fact that the game is supposed to be celebrated. I echo his sentiments real hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric/OR</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/the-gambler-and-the-investor-two-models-of-fandom/#comment-93631</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric/OR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=8622#comment-93631</guid>
		<description>Carson, this is my favorite piece of the 3 you&#039;ve written thus far; it seems the most personal and has some great flow.  I think the trend towards &quot;diversification of rooting interests&quot; (or however one wishes to put it) that you highlighted is a meaningful one.  Two factors in particular stand out for me as enabling this: 1) the increased geographic mobility of society generally and 2) the explosive growth of widely-available resources online.  If anyone is familiar with Free Darko&#039;s Macrophenomenal Pro Basketball Almanac, the &quot;manifesto&quot;/forward tells a similar tale for analytically-minded hoops fans.

A good piece and a good observation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carson, this is my favorite piece of the 3 you&#8217;ve written thus far; it seems the most personal and has some great flow.  I think the trend towards &#8220;diversification of rooting interests&#8221; (or however one wishes to put it) that you highlighted is a meaningful one.  Two factors in particular stand out for me as enabling this: 1) the increased geographic mobility of society generally and 2) the explosive growth of widely-available resources online.  If anyone is familiar with Free Darko&#8217;s Macrophenomenal Pro Basketball Almanac, the &#8220;manifesto&#8221;/forward tells a similar tale for analytically-minded hoops fans.</p>
<p>A good piece and a good observation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teej</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/the-gambler-and-the-investor-two-models-of-fandom/#comment-93525</link>
		<dc:creator>Teej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=8622#comment-93525</guid>
		<description>The AP Stylebook doesn&#039;t say &quot;amidst&quot; isn&#039;t a word; it recommends that newspapers use &quot;amid&quot; instead. The stylebook should be the last place you look to find out if something is a word.

Furthermore, the AP is not the arbiter of English usage. It&#039;s a &lt;i&gt;style&lt;/i&gt; guide for those organizations that choose to follow it.

And at least as it stands now (not sure if it&#039;s been edited), there are not four grammar errors in that first paragraph.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The AP Stylebook doesn&#8217;t say &#8220;amidst&#8221; isn&#8217;t a word; it recommends that newspapers use &#8220;amid&#8221; instead. The stylebook should be the last place you look to find out if something is a word.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the AP is not the arbiter of English usage. It&#8217;s a <i>style</i> guide for those organizations that choose to follow it.</p>
<p>And at least as it stands now (not sure if it&#8217;s been edited), there are not four grammar errors in that first paragraph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/the-gambler-and-the-investor-two-models-of-fandom/#comment-93423</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 03:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=8622#comment-93423</guid>
		<description>I agree with all the positive comments here.  I hope this guy keeps writing for fangraphs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with all the positive comments here.  I hope this guy keeps writing for fangraphs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Vaunted Christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/the-gambler-and-the-investor-two-models-of-fandom/#comment-93406</link>
		<dc:creator>The Vaunted Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 01:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=8622#comment-93406</guid>
		<description>we get it. you like the red sox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we get it. you like the red sox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/the-gambler-and-the-investor-two-models-of-fandom/#comment-93404</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=8622#comment-93404</guid>
		<description>Zero errors in first paragraph.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zero errors in first paragraph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shush</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/the-gambler-and-the-investor-two-models-of-fandom/#comment-93393</link>
		<dc:creator>Shush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=8622#comment-93393</guid>
		<description>At least four spotted here. The AP Stylebook does not consider &quot;amidst&quot; a word, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least four spotted here. The AP Stylebook does not consider &#8220;amidst&#8221; a word, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/the-gambler-and-the-investor-two-models-of-fandom/#comment-93384</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=8622#comment-93384</guid>
		<description>If you can&#039;t read a couple thousand words in five minutes,  watcha ought to be doing is more book readin&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you can&#8217;t read a couple thousand words in five minutes,  watcha ought to be doing is more book readin&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

