<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Pirates Plunder Toronto</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/the-pirates-plunder-toronto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/the-pirates-plunder-toronto/</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:26:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt w</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/the-pirates-plunder-toronto/#comment-467499</link>
		<dc:creator>matt w</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 02:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/the-pirates-plunder-toronto/#comment-467499</guid>
		<description>We also now know that Pittsburgh got far the better of the Tabata-Nady portion of that deal (if that&#039;s how we break it down).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We also now know that Pittsburgh got far the better of the Tabata-Nady portion of that deal (if that&#8217;s how we break it down).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Au</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/the-pirates-plunder-toronto/#comment-260891</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Au</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/the-pirates-plunder-toronto/#comment-260891</guid>
		<description>We now know that Toronto got far the better of this deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We now know that Toronto got far the better of this deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan B.</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/the-pirates-plunder-toronto/#comment-40899</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/the-pirates-plunder-toronto/#comment-40899</guid>
		<description>Tom, excellent well written post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, excellent well written post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Au</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/the-pirates-plunder-toronto/#comment-40867</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Au</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/the-pirates-plunder-toronto/#comment-40867</guid>
		<description>(As a former Pittsburgher) I HATE most of these trades.

The one that I approve of was Marte for two other pitchers, say, Karstens and Ohlendorf. Otherwise, Nady, a solid and steadily improving player, was in essence traded for a third pitcher and Jose Tabata, who I consider to be the next Manny Ramirez at best (a talented bundle of headaches). I didn&#039;t want to see Nady go but if the idea was to free up money to keep Jason Bay, then it would have made sense.

Trading Bautista, who is correcting his past attitude problems, and showing signs of breaking out, and (I believe) will have a break out year in 2009, was a move made at the wrong time.

Worse yet, replacing Bautista was part of the motive for trading Jason Bay, the worst move since the Bosox traded Babe Ruth to the Yankees and established the curse of the Bambino. If it&#039;s 86 years (from 1979) till the Pirates win their next World Series, that will be 2065, after I&#039;m gone. Bay was the fourth best left fielder in 117 years of Pirates&#039; history (after Giles, Stargell, and Kiner), meaning that the next one will come along some time in the 2030s. He was begging to stay in Pittsburgh, meaning that he could have been signed to a multi-year contract extension for the $10 million a year that Giles is making (plus a no-trade clause), even though he&#039;s worth perhaps $12-$14 million on the open market. And like Stargell and Kiner (and unlike Giles), Bay had great potential value to Pittsburgh A.B. (after baseball)

The consideration for Bay, the Pirates&#039; &quot;birthright,&quot;  was &quot;a mess of pottage;&quot; Andy LaRoche, a downtrade from Bautista, Brandon Moss, a downtrade from Nady, and two more pitchers, which they didn&#039;t really need. The Pirates&#039; starting pitching problem is basically self-correcting, because Snell, Duke, and even Gorzelanny all have FIPs well below their ERAs (although Gorzo&#039;s FIP is still above 6.) An emerging Maholm, middle of rotation Snell and Duke (on FIPs), plus Karstens, Dumatrait, and Jason Davis gives them enough to work with. &quot;Regression to the mean&quot; might have suggested a WPA of about 0 from Pirates&#039; starters in 2009, meaning that a strong bullpen and what was the best outfield offense in baseball could have made the Pirates competitive in 2009.

If Tabata and Pedro Alvarez (who cost Bay&#039;s $6 milllion salary to sign) turn out to be the &quot;new Nady&quot; and &quot;new Bay,&quot; I&#039;ll eat my words. But Alvarez doesn&#039;t even have the decency to show up for &quot;work.&quot; Trading to the two &quot;good citizen&quot; veterans for two bad-boy rookies plus some pitching isn&#039;t my idea of a good deal.

My money is on the Toronto Blue Jays (for 2010). They will have a breakout Bautista, plus an inside track to signing Bay (a Canadian) after 2009. Combining their pitching with the offense that the Pirates just dismantled makes them potential champions.

And did I say Pirates? My new name for them is &quot;Piroches.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(As a former Pittsburgher) I HATE most of these trades.</p>
<p>The one that I approve of was Marte for two other pitchers, say, Karstens and Ohlendorf. Otherwise, Nady, a solid and steadily improving player, was in essence traded for a third pitcher and Jose Tabata, who I consider to be the next Manny Ramirez at best (a talented bundle of headaches). I didn&#8217;t want to see Nady go but if the idea was to free up money to keep Jason Bay, then it would have made sense.</p>
<p>Trading Bautista, who is correcting his past attitude problems, and showing signs of breaking out, and (I believe) will have a break out year in 2009, was a move made at the wrong time.</p>
<p>Worse yet, replacing Bautista was part of the motive for trading Jason Bay, the worst move since the Bosox traded Babe Ruth to the Yankees and established the curse of the Bambino. If it&#8217;s 86 years (from 1979) till the Pirates win their next World Series, that will be 2065, after I&#8217;m gone. Bay was the fourth best left fielder in 117 years of Pirates&#8217; history (after Giles, Stargell, and Kiner), meaning that the next one will come along some time in the 2030s. He was begging to stay in Pittsburgh, meaning that he could have been signed to a multi-year contract extension for the $10 million a year that Giles is making (plus a no-trade clause), even though he&#8217;s worth perhaps $12-$14 million on the open market. And like Stargell and Kiner (and unlike Giles), Bay had great potential value to Pittsburgh A.B. (after baseball)</p>
<p>The consideration for Bay, the Pirates&#8217; &#8220;birthright,&#8221;  was &#8220;a mess of pottage;&#8221; Andy LaRoche, a downtrade from Bautista, Brandon Moss, a downtrade from Nady, and two more pitchers, which they didn&#8217;t really need. The Pirates&#8217; starting pitching problem is basically self-correcting, because Snell, Duke, and even Gorzelanny all have FIPs well below their ERAs (although Gorzo&#8217;s FIP is still above 6.) An emerging Maholm, middle of rotation Snell and Duke (on FIPs), plus Karstens, Dumatrait, and Jason Davis gives them enough to work with. &#8220;Regression to the mean&#8221; might have suggested a WPA of about 0 from Pirates&#8217; starters in 2009, meaning that a strong bullpen and what was the best outfield offense in baseball could have made the Pirates competitive in 2009.</p>
<p>If Tabata and Pedro Alvarez (who cost Bay&#8217;s $6 milllion salary to sign) turn out to be the &#8220;new Nady&#8221; and &#8220;new Bay,&#8221; I&#8217;ll eat my words. But Alvarez doesn&#8217;t even have the decency to show up for &#8220;work.&#8221; Trading to the two &#8220;good citizen&#8221; veterans for two bad-boy rookies plus some pitching isn&#8217;t my idea of a good deal.</p>
<p>My money is on the Toronto Blue Jays (for 2010). They will have a breakout Bautista, plus an inside track to signing Bay (a Canadian) after 2009. Combining their pitching with the offense that the Pirates just dismantled makes them potential champions.</p>
<p>And did I say Pirates? My new name for them is &#8220;Piroches.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

