Comments on: Top NL Rookie Hitters

By: Amparo Steady

Amparo Steady — Thu, 10 Nov 2011 17:05:20 +0000

Nice post mate, I love your blog, thanks for sharing it :)

By: rrod repair

rrod repair — Sat, 05 Nov 2011 00:51:06 +0000

Yours is a prime example of informative writing. I think my students could learn a lot from your writing style and your content. I may share this article with them.

By: bluecaboose

bluecaboose — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:23:39 +0000

him and francis could start a smart ballplayers club :P

By: bluecaboose

bluecaboose — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:22:59 +0000

as much as i agree with the small sample size comment, he did end up hitting something like .320/.384/.608 after the break, good enough to equalize that overall line out to .284/.353/.525.

I’d call that better than Parra.

By: Marver

Marver — Sun, 16 Aug 2009 00:26:37 +0000

“If I take one bite, will you bring me a steak?”

By: Ryan

Ryan — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 20:50:34 +0000

Almost went to Harvard for college and to play basketball.

By: ineedanap

ineedanap — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:12:36 +0000

Just out of curiousity, why do you say that Fowler is “extremely intelligent”?

Not disputing it, just thought there might be an interesting story behind it.

By: shawndgoldman

shawndgoldman — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:06:48 +0000

It’s not just sample size, it’s also that as he gets more AB’s his weaknesses become more exposed. I could be wrong (it’s happened lots before) but I think that if Fox plays full-time he’ll get more exposed and his rate stats will come down.

But I don’t dispute that rate-wise, he deserves to be on that list. I just question his ability to keep up those rates over a larger sample and with more exposure.

By: shawndgoldman

shawndgoldman — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:00:27 +0000

Ahhhh… OK, then!

By: tom s.

tom s. — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:00:18 +0000

highly likely he does not have the green light. direct your complaints to the man in charge.