<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Toronto Blue Jays: Top 10 Prospects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/toronto-blue-jays-top-10-prospects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/toronto-blue-jays-top-10-prospects/</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:07:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt B.</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/toronto-blue-jays-top-10-prospects/#comment-126734</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 01:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14962#comment-126734</guid>
		<description>Yes DavidEicen, that is PRECISELY what I said....  Good call...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes DavidEicen, that is PRECISELY what I said&#8230;.  Good call&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gnomez</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/toronto-blue-jays-top-10-prospects/#comment-126672</link>
		<dc:creator>gnomez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14962#comment-126672</guid>
		<description>What do people who follow the Jays&#039; system think of Ryan Page?  3.0 K/BB ratio, 51% GB rate.  Yes, his strikeout rate is really low (only 4.8 K9), but I&#039;d imagine there will be some improvement as he develops, and he&#039;s pretty effective as-is as a pitch-to-contact pitcher.  He&#039;s also LH, which gives him plenty of options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do people who follow the Jays&#8217; system think of Ryan Page?  3.0 K/BB ratio, 51% GB rate.  Yes, his strikeout rate is really low (only 4.8 K9), but I&#8217;d imagine there will be some improvement as he develops, and he&#8217;s pretty effective as-is as a pitch-to-contact pitcher.  He&#8217;s also LH, which gives him plenty of options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renegade</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/toronto-blue-jays-top-10-prospects/#comment-126490</link>
		<dc:creator>Renegade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14962#comment-126490</guid>
		<description>Yup. Two lists that came out this week (MLB Mayo&#039;s and ESPN&#039;s Law) had Wallace far ahead of Taylor. We&#039;ll see what BP and BA&#039;s lists say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup. Two lists that came out this week (MLB Mayo&#8217;s and ESPN&#8217;s Law) had Wallace far ahead of Taylor. We&#8217;ll see what BP and BA&#8217;s lists say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BX</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/toronto-blue-jays-top-10-prospects/#comment-126466</link>
		<dc:creator>BX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14962#comment-126466</guid>
		<description>Strongly doubt the A&#039;s would&#039;ve traded him if it was likely he was passable at 3B.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strongly doubt the A&#8217;s would&#8217;ve traded him if it was likely he was passable at 3B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dl80</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/toronto-blue-jays-top-10-prospects/#comment-126458</link>
		<dc:creator>dl80</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14962#comment-126458</guid>
		<description>Totally agree.  I&#039;m certainly not a major league scout by any means, but everything I&#039;ve seen and read pegs Wallace as, at best, Lyle Overbay 2.0.

Overbay has had a decent/good career, and had several seasons of 2 - 2.5 WAR.  He&#039;s been roughly an average first basemen for his career, with some years up and some down.  That is plenty useful for a team like the Blue Jays.  But it certainly isn&#039;t going to help them climb the AL East.  And that&#039;s probably Wallace&#039;s CEILING.  

.290/.350/.450.  Meh.  That&#039;s assuming everything basically goes right for Wallace.  Then the Jays MIGHT have an average first basemen on their hands.  If that truly is their #1 prospect, they&#039;re going to be in 3rd or 4th (5th?) place in that division for a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree.  I&#8217;m certainly not a major league scout by any means, but everything I&#8217;ve seen and read pegs Wallace as, at best, Lyle Overbay 2.0.</p>
<p>Overbay has had a decent/good career, and had several seasons of 2 &#8211; 2.5 WAR.  He&#8217;s been roughly an average first basemen for his career, with some years up and some down.  That is plenty useful for a team like the Blue Jays.  But it certainly isn&#8217;t going to help them climb the AL East.  And that&#8217;s probably Wallace&#8217;s CEILING.  </p>
<p>.290/.350/.450.  Meh.  That&#8217;s assuming everything basically goes right for Wallace.  Then the Jays MIGHT have an average first basemen on their hands.  If that truly is their #1 prospect, they&#8217;re going to be in 3rd or 4th (5th?) place in that division for a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AL</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/toronto-blue-jays-top-10-prospects/#comment-126424</link>
		<dc:creator>AL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14962#comment-126424</guid>
		<description>What do you guys think about Tim Collins?  I though he might have been somewhere on this list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you guys think about Tim Collins?  I though he might have been somewhere on this list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mylegacy</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/toronto-blue-jays-top-10-prospects/#comment-126396</link>
		<dc:creator>Mylegacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 06:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14962#comment-126396</guid>
		<description>Marc - as usual - good work.

By this time next year the Jays will have a much different looking minor league system. Guys like Jenkins (who I&#039;m over the moon high one), Manisnick, Pierre, D&#039;Arnaud and Perez - not to mention one or two of Jackson&#039;s &quot;Class&quot; - I expect to almost ALL come on strong. Throw in 8 (9 if Barajas signs a Major League contract) newbies in the Draft before the fourth round AND who knows what on international signings and I&#039;m wired about the Jays going forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc &#8211; as usual &#8211; good work.</p>
<p>By this time next year the Jays will have a much different looking minor league system. Guys like Jenkins (who I&#8217;m over the moon high one), Manisnick, Pierre, D&#8217;Arnaud and Perez &#8211; not to mention one or two of Jackson&#8217;s &#8220;Class&#8221; &#8211; I expect to almost ALL come on strong. Throw in 8 (9 if Barajas signs a Major League contract) newbies in the Draft before the fourth round AND who knows what on international signings and I&#8217;m wired about the Jays going forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick K</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/toronto-blue-jays-top-10-prospects/#comment-126391</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 05:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14962#comment-126391</guid>
		<description>No David Cooper?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No David Cooper?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Hulet</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/toronto-blue-jays-top-10-prospects/#comment-126325</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Hulet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14962#comment-126325</guid>
		<description>There is definitely hope for Jackson, Tolisano, Ahrens, etc. They&#039;ll all repeat high-A ball this year.

I&#039;d personally take Wallace ahead of Taylor, but I&#039;ve also been following his career a lot longer (2005) so I know him a bit better. 

Josh Roenicke is still a prospect, but he&#039;s 27 and has control issues.

Johermyn Chavez would not have been Top 10... I like him and probably would have had him ranked in the later part of the 20s.

The AL/NL West lists are the last to come, so you can expect the Rangers in the next couple of weeks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is definitely hope for Jackson, Tolisano, Ahrens, etc. They&#8217;ll all repeat high-A ball this year.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d personally take Wallace ahead of Taylor, but I&#8217;ve also been following his career a lot longer (2005) so I know him a bit better. </p>
<p>Josh Roenicke is still a prospect, but he&#8217;s 27 and has control issues.</p>
<p>Johermyn Chavez would not have been Top 10&#8230; I like him and probably would have had him ranked in the later part of the 20s.</p>
<p>The AL/NL West lists are the last to come, so you can expect the Rangers in the next couple of weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kampfer</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/toronto-blue-jays-top-10-prospects/#comment-126324</link>
		<dc:creator>Kampfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=14962#comment-126324</guid>
		<description>A 1B Wallace is not going to be ahead of Taylor.Now Taylor is most likely a better prospect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 1B Wallace is not going to be ahead of Taylor.Now Taylor is most likely a better prospect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

