<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trade Deadline Prospects Ranked, Part 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/trade-deadline-prospects-ranked-part-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/trade-deadline-prospects-ranked-part-4/</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:08:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TimberLee</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/trade-deadline-prospects-ranked-part-4/#comment-90107</link>
		<dc:creator>TimberLee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=7561#comment-90107</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s wait a few years before we argue about how these prospects have been ranked, shall we?  Marson, Stewart, Hagadone : I&#039;ll tell you for pretty certain in 2019.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s wait a few years before we argue about how these prospects have been ranked, shall we?  Marson, Stewart, Hagadone : I&#8217;ll tell you for pretty certain in 2019.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/trade-deadline-prospects-ranked-part-4/#comment-89950</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 04:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=7561#comment-89950</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure exactly that Marc was saying that, but I&#039;d agree that the &quot;closer&quot; is an overvalued role on a baseball team.

How do you even rate guys at that position?  Hell, I&#039;d rather the credit go to the swing guy who pitched the starter out of a jam in the 6th or 7th innings instead of a guy that comes on with none on in the 9th.  We&#039;re only talking about three outs here!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure exactly that Marc was saying that, but I&#8217;d agree that the &#8220;closer&#8221; is an overvalued role on a baseball team.</p>
<p>How do you even rate guys at that position?  Hell, I&#8217;d rather the credit go to the swing guy who pitched the starter out of a jam in the 6th or 7th innings instead of a guy that comes on with none on in the 9th.  We&#8217;re only talking about three outs here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/trade-deadline-prospects-ranked-part-4/#comment-89768</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=7561#comment-89768</guid>
		<description>A closer is more valuable than a #4 starter?

Ladies and gentlemen, the 21st century, where a pitcher who throws 60 innings a year tops and is rated by an arbitrarily defined stat than can only be earned in a certain inning is considered harder to find than a guy who can throw 180+ innings a year. Sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A closer is more valuable than a #4 starter?</p>
<p>Ladies and gentlemen, the 21st century, where a pitcher who throws 60 innings a year tops and is rated by an arbitrarily defined stat than can only be earned in a certain inning is considered harder to find than a guy who can throw 180+ innings a year. Sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/trade-deadline-prospects-ranked-part-4/#comment-89756</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 16:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=7561#comment-89756</guid>
		<description>Why wouldn&#039;t they take whoever were the best prospects being offered to them regardless of position or need?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why wouldn&#8217;t they take whoever were the best prospects being offered to them regardless of position or need?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/trade-deadline-prospects-ranked-part-4/#comment-89752</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 16:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=7561#comment-89752</guid>
		<description>I think Cleveland wanted Marson just-in-case Santana needs to move positions at some point.  Much like I expect my Orioles to take a few catchers in the next couple of drafts in the event they decide Wieters needs to move to 1B.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Cleveland wanted Marson just-in-case Santana needs to move positions at some point.  Much like I expect my Orioles to take a few catchers in the next couple of drafts in the event they decide Wieters needs to move to 1B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/trade-deadline-prospects-ranked-part-4/#comment-89749</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 16:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=7561#comment-89749</guid>
		<description>Why would Cleveland trade for Marson if they have Santana waiting in the wings?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would Cleveland trade for Marson if they have Santana waiting in the wings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/trade-deadline-prospects-ranked-part-4/#comment-89736</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 14:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=7561#comment-89736</guid>
		<description>Most scouts seem to think he doesn&#039;t have great stuff, which is what keeps him from being more highly rated.  Let&#039;s hope the deception continues to work for him, I&#039;m psyched to see another quality pitcher in the Orioles organization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most scouts seem to think he doesn&#8217;t have great stuff, which is what keeps him from being more highly rated.  Let&#8217;s hope the deception continues to work for him, I&#8217;m psyched to see another quality pitcher in the Orioles organization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/trade-deadline-prospects-ranked-part-4/#comment-89732</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=7561#comment-89732</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m already surprised that Hagadone would be in the top 7, seeing that Stewart isn&#039;t. I&#039;m not that familiar with all the other traded prospects, though, but that seems quite strange to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m already surprised that Hagadone would be in the top 7, seeing that Stewart isn&#8217;t. I&#8217;m not that familiar with all the other traded prospects, though, but that seems quite strange to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.Dwyer</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/trade-deadline-prospects-ranked-part-4/#comment-89704</link>
		<dc:creator>R.Dwyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 02:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=7561#comment-89704</guid>
		<description>I would have to go back and check, but...

there seems to be a NL-&gt;AL trend for these deals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have to go back and check, but&#8230;</p>
<p>there seems to be a NL-&gt;AL trend for these deals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/trade-deadline-prospects-ranked-part-4/#comment-89693</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 22:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=7561#comment-89693</guid>
		<description>why? cause he was a former boston prospect and everyone in the world is in love with boston????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why? cause he was a former boston prospect and everyone in the world is in love with boston????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
