http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/twinkie-relief/ Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:42:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/twinkie-relief/#comment-61739 Eric Seidman Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:44:46 +0000 http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=2806#comment-61739 No, it isn't always runs/10. The pitcher's individual run environment as well as his home park factor determine the specific runs to win conversion. For Nathan, in 2005, the conversion was apparently 10.4 runs/win. No, it isn’t always runs/10. The pitcher’s individual run environment as well as his home park factor determine the specific runs to win conversion. For Nathan, in 2005, the conversion was apparently 10.4 runs/win.

]]> http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/twinkie-relief/#comment-61737 Nathan Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:43:15 +0000 http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=2806#comment-61737 If Nathan was +32.2 runs, wouldn't he be +3.2 wins not +3.1? If Nathan was +32.2 runs, wouldn’t he be +3.2 wins not +3.1?

]]> http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/twinkie-relief/#comment-61734 Tom Au Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:20:20 +0000 http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=2806#comment-61734 Goes back to the comment I made yesterday about hthe Twins having pitching to spare--and often not making the playoffs--in spite of this fact. Goes back to the comment I made yesterday about hthe Twins having pitching to spare–and often not making the playoffs–in spite of this fact.

]]> http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/twinkie-relief/#comment-61729 Trey Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:11:31 +0000 http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=2806#comment-61729 I hope you're planning on writing an article about their fielding and calling it The Twinkie Defense. I hope you’re planning on writing an article about their fielding and calling it The Twinkie Defense.

]]>