<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using Advanced Metrics on The Machine Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/using-advanced-metrics-on-the-machine-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/using-advanced-metrics-on-the-machine-part-2/</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:42:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MU789</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/using-advanced-metrics-on-the-machine-part-2/#comment-95642</link>
		<dc:creator>MU789</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=9084#comment-95642</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve ever seen any defensive stats but when people talk about a team being strong up the middle they could have been talking about the Reds.  Bench, Concepcion, Morgan and Geronimo were all above average defensively though I think you could find players that were better at each position (say Boone or Maddox).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve ever seen any defensive stats but when people talk about a team being strong up the middle they could have been talking about the Reds.  Bench, Concepcion, Morgan and Geronimo were all above average defensively though I think you could find players that were better at each position (say Boone or Maddox).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/using-advanced-metrics-on-the-machine-part-2/#comment-95628</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 20:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=9084#comment-95628</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know how good the Machine&#039;s defense is statistically?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know how good the Machine&#8217;s defense is statistically?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/using-advanced-metrics-on-the-machine-part-2/#comment-95626</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 20:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=9084#comment-95626</guid>
		<description>I have no idea what I&#039;m looking at with regard to the graphs. Is one K/9 and the other BB/9?

You say to look &quot;at the graph below&quot; to see their strike out percentage, but then you also mention the same graph deals with walks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea what I&#8217;m looking at with regard to the graphs. Is one K/9 and the other BB/9?</p>
<p>You say to look &#8220;at the graph below&#8221; to see their strike out percentage, but then you also mention the same graph deals with walks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ancient Mariner</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/using-advanced-metrics-on-the-machine-part-2/#comment-95558</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ancient Mariner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 14:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=9084#comment-95558</guid>
		<description>You forgot something:  &quot;Combine an offense that loves walks with a pitching staff that hates them &lt;i&gt;and a good set of fielders&lt;/i&gt;, and you get a pretty nifty team.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot something:  &#8220;Combine an offense that loves walks with a pitching staff that hates them <i>and a good set of fielders</i>, and you get a pretty nifty team.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/using-advanced-metrics-on-the-machine-part-2/#comment-95541</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 13:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=9084#comment-95541</guid>
		<description>How common were homers in those days? What percent of balls in play league-wide became homers (and what is the percent these days)? It seems like a strategy of just letting the batter put the ball in play and then counting on the defense will work better the fewer homers there are...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How common were homers in those days? What percent of balls in play league-wide became homers (and what is the percent these days)? It seems like a strategy of just letting the batter put the ball in play and then counting on the defense will work better the fewer homers there are&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous coward</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/using-advanced-metrics-on-the-machine-part-2/#comment-95484</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 03:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=9084#comment-95484</guid>
		<description>fun stuff.  folks can get picky about grammar, but one can also get picky about graphical presentation.  how about some labels on those figures?  dots and numbers don&#039;t convey the information alone!  it takes time, but your readers will appreciate it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fun stuff.  folks can get picky about grammar, but one can also get picky about graphical presentation.  how about some labels on those figures?  dots and numbers don&#8217;t convey the information alone!  it takes time, but your readers will appreciate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MU789</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/using-advanced-metrics-on-the-machine-part-2/#comment-95466</link>
		<dc:creator>MU789</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 01:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=9084#comment-95466</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s Rawly Eastwick.  His brother Randy was an all-star wiffle ball pitcher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s Rawly Eastwick.  His brother Randy was an all-star wiffle ball pitcher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike B.</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/using-advanced-metrics-on-the-machine-part-2/#comment-95459</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=9084#comment-95459</guid>
		<description>Positive or negative ions&#039; less coverage?

It&#039;s true about the relative anonymity of that staff--though I recognized every position player in the earlier post, I&#039;m familiar with only a few of these pitchers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Positive or negative ions&#8217; less coverage?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true about the relative anonymity of that staff&#8211;though I recognized every position player in the earlier post, I&#8217;m familiar with only a few of these pitchers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

